Search results

The Ashley preferred bidder is just the usual Telegraph rehash and taking Keyes tweet for gospel again.

Dont think we are, the model is to live within your means so all they have done is reschedule payments. They have put money in when they have needed too, thats the problem unless you gamble on a large investment in the squad which they dont your stuck.

His daughters best mate?

Why would you think Ashley wouldnt fund it properly, the figures from Newcastle suggest he would?

Ashley spent 356 mill on transfers and got back 129 mill in sales so on paper its just the disquiet from the Geordies rather than investment. They were 18 million in the red when he bought them and 12 in the black when he sold. Those that dont want that kind of investment seem a little short...

Would be interested to know what would cost 13 million to repair, care to hazard a guess? Thats a lot of investment.

Perhaps they are the preferrdd buyer of the liquidated lease and the payments would be deducted from the cost of a new lease. Council gets money and games get put on. Just a theory?

How could they sue if its within their legal right? They would just be makjng sure there freehold asset was operational wouldnt they?

The gift of the lease would fall back to the council, i believe someone posted that previously.

c If SISU are the only players in town I dont think they can afford to be choosey?

Isn't the liquidation option down to the fact that ACL have no cash or liquidity? If they dont have the ability to raise a line of credit to fund ongoing day to day costs as its already been taken they cant operate?

Sisu would not reinvest profits in the team just because they own the stadium thats not their model. They would look to make it like us cost neutral and then take the profits, wouldnt surprise me if they still charged the club rent for the ground. It would mean however its a better proposition...

Then SISU are in the game it would seem. Perhaps playing the long game has worked and they then package it all together and sell it on?

The one thing I would say is if you get a player on a free its not counted in the spend. But you can bet that players like Ohare and Vick will be on the big bucks in the club plus the uplift in wages from promotion that has to absorbed. We may have only had a net spend on transfers of 2.5...

No ones going to buy the stadium before it goes into administration, you would have to not give a shit about the value. The question is if Wasps paid 15 million for the lease and the Stadium needs upwards of £15 million spending on it whats the lease actual worth, 3 or 4 million?

It makes you laugh really if that happens. Hes basically mugged off a load of bond holders to pay off the debts to both him and the council and would end up with the arena for a lot less than the 36 million. legal theft.

Eakin said Vaughan has told him that they hope Wasps will be playing in the championship next year and hope to play in Coventry as thats where the training ground is near. Still no fucking filter to what most Coventrians think of them or any though that we all ready have a rugby team in that...

The online shop is operational and they are asking £90 for the home shirt of a team that has gone out of existence. No wonder they went bust with merchandise at that price.

Didnt have you down as a conspiracy theorist. The only reason the Telegraph did not run storys is financial, Wasps would have pulled advertings and they would have lost revenue. The BBC has been accused of impartiality as reporters have included opinion and not just facts in its media. When they...

By tbe looks of it ffom what i can pick out the P share is the sticking point in the negotiations. The share entitles you to income but you loose it if you enter administration. Potential buyers won't commit unless Wasps retain the P share but will only buy them from administration as it gets...