Search results

That isn't an analysis, it is an admission that you don't understand how those contracts work & why they've been made. I agree a joint approach for sponsopship/naming rights would bring more money in, how it would be shared is the issue but that scanario isn't on the cards right now is it.

I never expressed one on that, I'm asking the poster to justify his assertion that there is a clusterfuck of contracts.

Mmmmm.. look at that green painted plywood infill below the window.

It seems to me you are just repeating an argument that agrees with your opinion/wishes without having analysed the numbers. If not can we all see your analysis, what contracts and what are the numbers etc.?

Pool reflections. Canalside reflections.

Wasps debt is making it the sort of debt laden company SISU could turn around.:angelic:

It is the level of opposition encountered. For instance Asnsty & Whitley South would be less as industrial zoneing is already established in those areas. So they pick a well to do area where you might expect locals to mobilise more effectively.

That contract was terminated last year. £195m Ricoh Arena hospitality deal ends 12 years early

Sure, and you're a red herring.

Actually we are not certain about what part of the land is being taked about & don't forget substantial on site parking would be needed.

More info about grade II listed buildings (IMHO Historic England are mad).

That is obvious now. Also it is clear that if SISU wanted to pick a site that would receive serious opposition to stretch out the planning process they could hardly have chosen better.

Do you live in the Ward?

and irrelevant.

For heavens sake man, they clearly want a training facillity to stop player drain due to shitty Broad St porta kabins & have chosen to spend the dosh on Leamington. Why are you chucking out spurious diversions when it is bloody obvious what they're doing, I'm not supporting them I'm merely...

There are conditions to the CVC money.. so the development makes sense for them. Premiership rugby agrees to sell minority stake to CVC Capital Partners | Daily Mail Online

Pretty straight forward & any compedent architeect/engineering practise would be quite used to complying with.

Which is why the SISU plan is suspect, especially in the absense of detail they have made public. What's the betting they are simply creating adverse conditions for their competitor in order to acquire the Ricoh. If they were serious they would not put up with delays and would be folowing up...

I don't believe that, there are no choo choo's!

Flowers on a tree