Search results

I don’t understand your reasoning, it’s the managers call but up to the players who came on to deliver.

To be fair many on here agreed we were awful at Loftus Road. That’s not arrogance just realism.

Very good, a bit of time cherry picking there. I like that. However as I said I admire your filing system and your determination to be proven right. Evans was shown to be a chancer, you and some of your chums had reached your conclusion without any evidence other than the court of Grendel. At a...

Well well Grendel, digging in to your files I see. To recap I believe that you are making this up, what I said was time will tell if Evans was a chancer but until then he should be listened to, show me otherwise, a bit like Bright really. i like to look on the bright side of life rather than be...

Every alley for Grendel is a blind one at the moment. I do admire his determination to see an argument through to its death. Luther Blissett and Geoff Thomas may have not been the best to represent England but both had fine careers and were chosen by very good managers at club and country.

That fat bird is someone’s mother, daughter, wife.

He had great period at Man City, went to Albion, Leeds, United and us and it never really got going but on his day he was very talented.

Indeed

Did you not rate his performance v Southampton in December 84 in the fog?

I saw with my own eyes the guy has a talent so yes.

If, and it’s a big if, he is taking the piss it’s hard to disagree but I do hope it’s just conjecture. The guy has a talent and to fail because of off the field events is a waste for him and the club.

Funny that FFP detectives haven’t seen what you seen.

Sorry can’t agree, It’s the envy. It’s like simply investment that has paid off as against Derby’s flushing it down the pan.

i didn’t shout, I merely pointed out that their net spend is nowhere near the biggest and they have planned their progress. All you are going on about is pre KingPower and they were naughty, Just as our owners were naughty, Leicester won we lost. Thank you joining in though.

I more took exception to the point that he said the same teams from that period are at the top now, which isn't really accurate is it? YOUR words

Take all the exception you like, This is the wrong argument. Derby and Forest are where they are because the owners didn’t have deep enough pockets, The rest are where they are because they were prepared to spend and have either had owners that were okay with the level of investment or parked...

10th biggest net spend over the past five years, below Bournemouth Leicester £381.4 M £268.8 M £112.6 M £22.5 M All big clubs have willing owners, Arsenal have spend a fortune on 2nd rate players, Leicester have spent moderately and reaped some rewards. Leicester are looking to raise the...

But so have other clubs, even Brentford, Stoke, Bournemouth. Leicester are a very well run club.

Of course you must say Leeds and Forest and Derby County were at that level but that doesn’t mean that City and Chelsea were not big clubs.

City and Chelsea were top teams in the mid to late sixties and early seventies. Both clubs overspent and went down the pyramid. Leicester were 4 times FA cup finalists before winning it this year, won the league cup a few times and have had good history before falling on hard times. I would...