Search results

Think you will find the term CCFC has been registered as a trademark too Search for a trade mark - Intellectual Property Office

Think you might get a letter from Speechley's in the not too distant future

it should include agents fees for players purchased or even free transfers brought as acquired loan players would be a straight revenue cost as would related agents fees and appear on the P&L - so no

I doubt he even knows CD

The income had better improve then because I doubt Wasps make much profit on CCFC. Quickest way to do that is to put the rent up of course. That's the catch though more income but more cost for CCFC quite possibly You are suggesting that Wasps give or dispose of 50% of its Ricoh assets ? Fixed...

Apparently the club needed to be provided bridging finance at the turn of the year. Given as said above Boddy provided an attendance budget of 9000 that says to me that the finances are very tight and there was a shortfall. Add to that the fact Otium required additional funding in 2017 of 500k...

by clever use of group situations and structures including arranging investment structures Hedge funds can generate losses they can use to offset investment profits and reduce tax bills

Ok I will bite :banghead: The you tube thing was written by Keiran Maguire, Football Finance Expert Just a few corrections all from the published accounts - Club acquired by SISU 22 February 2008 not in 2007 - Clubs do not have to split their income, indeed due to the size of some clubs in L2...

So what was said? Did we learn anything new?

things like this .............. Mohamed Salah: Liverpool forward's transfer value rises most in Europe on two fronts (a) it is ridiculous money to even consider paying (b) what's the point of doing valuations like this the only value that matters is what Liverpool accept

Not sure why we need to change it, to me it would be losing one of the few elements of recent CCFC heritage we have left. Keep what we have as far as I am concerned

and yet we won on Saturday and have won a total of 11 times out of 17 matches this season in the league drawing another 4 ...................... on that pitch There is only Accrington, Luton & Notts County that have won more at home so far this season It is not an excuse really in my mind

So they are not now and the fans are not protesting that are they. So the protests are really about what? I still think if they win a few games it will all die down. Crisis what crisis. They have nothing like the real problems at a number of EFL clubs.

Hard to feel sorry for their situation in my opinion. It is not that their existence is threatened or that the owners have not spent money. It is basically they haven't won the games they feel they are entitled to. Had they been winning the ground would be fine, so would the atmosphere. You see...

I really do not see that. He is having a good season but there are plenty playing at a higher level regularly ahead of him. It might happen in time but it's too early for England and the world cup. His next move has to be to a club where he plays regularly. Somewhere like spurs or Chelsea are...

Pleased with the three points but it wasn't a great game and I would think barnet will be disappointed not to take something from it. Just a few observations really. Firstly our movement is not great or is playing statues particularly at throw ins a tactic they have been practising - because...

If we want to raise money how about something like this? Tifosy - Pre-register to invest in the Canaries Bond

I wouldn't worry about the debt that sits in SBS&L. No one needs to buy that company, as it stands, to be able to get the club. Almost certainly the £28m pointed to as investment ion SBS&L has been written down to nil within the funds that own the loans & shares If you were to buy any company...

Never been a requirement to disclose that information so no What I can say is that direct and administrative expenses were at similar if not higher levels than they are now (excluding any cost inflation) . I know people query what is included but there seems to have been no great increase...

the whole business was based at HR though wingy most of the turnover was connected to the site. Richardson picked out a figure to bend the truth and even then it was wrong