Search results

  1. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    not everyone. Deal with the biggest problem first which is the rent deal. But there is no SISU out campaign that is really active, there is no real fight going in that direction. A challenge to Wasps even less so
  2. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    they could have fp the council and bank were over a barrel. The alternative was administration at best where they would have ended up with far less. There was no other tenant option at that time. Have never understood fully, other than certain self interests, why administration was such a no...
  3. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    The immediate target is Wasps irrespective of the history in 2007. They had no part in the 2007 deal, and the history doesn't deal with what needs solving now. Far too many people focus on what went on years ago, the problem is in 2018/19. The facts and problems that need dealing with are in...
  4. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    How does repeating, over and over and for the umpteenth time, a view of what partly happened in 2006 (12 years ago) actually solve our current predicament? SISU put very little in to acquire the club around £500k actual cash, perhaps that's why in their haste to make profits they did not deal...
  5. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    But it isnt "we (CCFC 'the club') who can legally sign any deal ................ which means any such deal would be a waste of paper. Wasps wouldnt be legally entitled to collect the rent from CCFC the club and there is nothing requiring Otium to pay it. Authority has to come from the Otium...
  6. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    I would like to see a strong active campaign to detail the worth of CCFC to Coventry and the local community. Starting now. We all know it but sometimes you have to state the b******* obvious to make the point. Make it detailed and talk it up in the press, to the council, businesses, decision...
  7. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    Not angry at Boddy & Co but to say Otium or OSB's window cleaning in your example is not involved is a nonsense and dividing OSB's Window cleaning in to a trading sub set called Nick,s squeegee doesnt change that. I know Sepalla is driving this but she is closely involved in the overall...
  8. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    it wasnt a shock in May 2015 when the bond was started nor when the CT printed their "exclusive". How were Wasps ever going to be able to making £5m per year after tax to be able to repay the bond from trading ? The article was right they couldnt but then it was never the intention to, the...
  9. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    all those years in finance wasted when it was all so clear in the news cuttings in the CT................ :banghead: entitled to your opinion will agree to disagree
  10. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    of course they dont but the person who controls and ultimately dictates the actions or all matters in the club does. She set it up this way, the staff all have responsibility to the director and owner in all matters concerning CCFC. That doesnt mean they are all involved in every decision of the...
  11. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    so who controls what the club does and who just works for it? Seppala doesnt just control or force the legal action
  12. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    in their shoes it has to be pretty close to doing that NW Well yes the real objectives is another matter isnt it
  13. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    It could be and if so if it happens then it worked not just for this year but for years going forward I would agree yes they have been preparing
  14. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    It is a pitch to the fans Nick. The decision makers on all sides know what is and what isnt. It really doesnt matter if Boddy tells everyone he is quite impotent in this. Do you not think the person with significant control of Otium has some say in the running of the club then?
  15. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    then i suggest you read it properly. I clearly said both clubs would be damaged by it. I also think you need to be able to look at things from the other side too. Rugby world because the prime focus of Wasps commercial set up is rugby (not football or Sky) and the other side of the business...
  16. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    Yes the share holder instructs legal counsel and drives the legal case which includes doing it on behalf of Otium Entertainment Group. It is just playing with words. There are only three legal entities taking the legal action ARVO, SBS&L and Otium. Otium is an active trading company not a shell...
  17. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    same old lines ..... i know it is hard for them to say otherwise ........ but no one really thinks the argument stands up to scrutiny Can someone list the reasons why CCFC and Otium are not the same thing other than trading name being different?
  18. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    maybe but............ So just to illustrate ... once it is done and couple months it wont register. Just to be clear they wont be kicking CCFC out, the agreement simply ends which gives Wasps some PR of their own to play with and can emphasise the SISU role. There will be a lot of other...
  19. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    playing devils advocate for a minute............... We get to March and the legals are on going possibly for no other reason than lack of court time. SISU confirm they will not withdraw the court action by SBS&L, ARVO & Otium. The CCFC/Otium cannot give the required notice of home ground for...
  20. oldskyblue58

    Appeal Dismissed

    according to CWR the council have spent £619K on JR 1 and £324K on JR 2 so far Add to that Wasps have spent £500k so far always knew i should have been a lawyer not an accountant !
Top