Search results

Not if the stadium is worth £65m

But DAR says neither are happening?

Thats the problem there is no turf because WASPs not laid any

Of course there will be caveats but they should not have to pay anything

It's because WASPs got millions off CCC for alleged improvements and CWG also would have paid to use facilities

Also CCFC have paid 3 months in advance to use have a playable pitch!

7s games are 14 mins Full games are 80+ mins so 6 times longer Equivalent of 66 is 11 There are no 16 man heavy scrums Only 14 people on pitch not 30 so half 11/ 2 = 6 comparable use of pitch

But the two parties did discuss the pitch and WASPs agreed to spend at least £100k and have only spent £7k and carry out maintenance I think that is called negotiation? Risk analysis builds in all known and reasonable risks - I suppose that should include the inability of WASPs to honour any...

https://www.efl.com/news/2022/august/coventry-city-efl-statement/

Did SISU force WASPS into around £60m in debt that they cannot repay?

There should be clauses in the Headlease about maintenence

66 games I'd misleading- its 66 games of 7's That's about the same impact on the pitch as 5 full games

500 WASPS jobs at risk you know!

Imagine headlines "sisu with holding rent again to distress ACL" No right of offset btw

He does not need £13m of taxpayers money then?

CRFC have sold 823

No filing as yet

Bondholders will continue to receive interest for the period from May 13, 2022, on a half-yearly basis until the date of redemption

That would be an IVA but would not go that route!