Search results

Retard is a generic insult word - same as Pikey or Gay - get over yourself.

Anyway back to the less mentally challenged in the room. The result suggests 1 in 4 defected from the tories to reform and 1 in 6 from Labour to reform

That applies to every club I would think in football

This wasn’t an election to a UK parliament. The discussion was trying to analyse sensibly the result and then the Village Retard steps in with a typically pointless contribution.

What do you mean?

Polanski is a moron He said in one programme he didn’t accept the court judgement on trans women and would plough more money into the NHS for gender reassignment He went down a complete rabbit hole on the Sunday politics show over a poem he endorsed and still insists we leave NATO and disarm

The Scottish parliament result was interesting. Labour won and the winner spent most time in his speech saying it shows Scotland don’t want reform. Until this election reform have made zero effort in Scotland Labour vote declined by 2%, SNP 15% and the conservatives 11% Reform grew by 26%

I honestly don’t get your point. The club could service its debts. This was never disputed by anybody when the court case started. The club deliberately refused to pay the rent and raised in the high court that the council itself was complicit in the decision making. There was never a...

Yes that’s correct

It wasn’t. The debt was old debt and no one knew whoever owned the club anyway. The debt was acclimated interst and never paid. The club went into administration as it refused to pay as a deliberate strategy and the council forced the club into administration.

We didn’t go into administration as the debts were unmanageable

No losses were being funded

When Sisu piled on debts against the club the FL I’m sure at one point forced them to turn the debt into shares - which effectively meant the debt was lost as the shares were never saleable. It avoided a breach of FL rules without which we could not come out of administration. The most likely...

His posting history shows knowledge on such issues. Your 5 posts - all oddly on this thread - suggest you don’t.

lol

It isn’t. It’s an injection of cash through share capital and isn’t to do with any valuation. The club is worth nothing like that.

It doesn’t imply he values the club at that at all. It’s worth nothing like that.

It is factually accurate that this year is likely to see record crossings. It’s also the case Starmer himself pledged this was an issue and he would “smash the gangs and stop the boats”

He didn’t score against spurs?

Hasn’t shown any signs he’s good enough to be in a top 6 team