Search results

I dont know which is worse, the club v ACL or supporters making statements, then being accused of an ACL / Sisu supporter. We get it, SISU are at fault. ACL are at fault, just because somebody expresses a wish for ACL to be asked some questions does not automatically mean anyone needs to jump...

Daniel Gidney then chairman was anti the football club so was trying to woo The Rugby clubs...

He was sent a private message and responded in kind. I would agree he was rather naive to think word would not get out. He also explained elsewhere on Facebook that he had not read the message correctly, and that he thought he was confirming that he had indeed had held talks with the club. Not...

I challenge you to find such a post.....

Just to clarify the club have not told or asked us to leave because of financial reasons, yes we had discussions over the clubs situation and our future, But as long as we are contracted to this club we'll always give our all and try to climb the league.

Baker denied on his facebook and ties in the Pressley version....

Ruined my Sunday. Thank god I didn't know of this last night otherwise my Saturday evening would have been ruined.

I wonder if PHIV has ever contacted SISU and enquired as to what it would take to buy the club.

Yeah, cos that's the big issue in this story..... Bad times if true and one which will lead to certain relegation and importantly will lead to further fans becoming disenchanted with the club.

Would imagine that will be Martin on loan and the French Forward MM.

Not strictly true though. They have always put in an amount each year, they just then don't put in anymore.

Don't want to hear it. Both sides now have a clear slate, and need to sit down and get the situation resolved ASAP.

Surely its a Sisu related company to give us a financial fair play boost.

Has a point though, why refuse to meet again, then on the final week make an offer, why could they have not got back around the table?

I presume this ties in with what Appleton has stated. On the flip side, why could'nt ACL return with a legally viable offer? I think they have been outmanouvered here and perhaps should have offered this at the orginal meeting where their powerbrokers decided not to to attend.

I should imagine the orginal 10 would be enough considering the FL's viewpoint and rulings on the whole matter.

Sorry, I see no cause for optimism in relation to investigations being carried out, this is the type of thing SISU excel at, and any investigation into the club will merely lead to fingers being pointed at the previous regime, then along with the judicial review this will see fingers pointed at...

Gidneys attitude shows just how far it became a see who can piss highest up the wall contest....

Still plenty of time for this to rumble on, after all whats to say the agreement for ground share ties us to a whole season there....

I would imagine the club are including tickets for sponsors players families in the amount they have "sold" so its possible the number actually exchanged for cash is a lot less.