Search results

well if we move there it will stay as good as empty

Could posssibly mean that someone may deem them as one and the same company which has other implications or if not huldings have no right to play in the FL

A truely frightnening scenario by OSB. Yet at the beginning when the FL and FA confirmed that the share was with Ltd the words that came from either appleton or Holdings was that holdings believed that they had a CLAIM on the share, which suggests that they didn't actually have it.

The first 2 points are not fact but your opinion that you are portraying as fact The 3rd SO YOU would be happy paying a higher rate of interest even if you knew you could get it cheaper and the lender would make a profit for the well being of the city of coventry The council is given a budget...

[/B] That will be it, play elsewhere with 2/3000 fans thats a visionary plan to get us into the blue square whatever it is in record time In all the people I have spoken to every single person has said not at the Ricoh /or if sisu are still here they will not go again , that includes...

You have just joined his forum and yet a thinly disguised support of all of sisus actions

yes they did

wonderful moral high ground you take and yet you are worried about being called a sisu rent boy I just want what is legally right aswell try asking some sisu Tim boy to pay the rent owed first before you get on your transparent moral high horse Then tell sisu to shut that door...

I know this is fantasy but the bit about just cut spending some where else is rubbish. The council is given a budget from central government for services and what ever cuts are applied are caused by central goverment cuts the local council. The local council just decide from where the cuts are...

Yes but the difference is that the council are lending, not giving a grant, for the money and making a profit from it. Where as the £60m to give them a share would have been just that giving it away

That maybe the case but if so smacks of desperation or just to prolong the issue

only if it contributes to their relegation

Only serious for rodney fisher but as he is already a director it has no bearing as I understand it. A shadow director is someone who is making the decisions whilst not actually a director but because they are making the decisions could be liable as if they were a director. ( in simple terms)

You should have seen the little carboot table outside the casino it was cringingly embarrassing for a so called professional club

Thought you were talking about fisher for a moment

never seen them in the same room together..........Hmmm

Probably should have done the same as last year Not have one

Cue Grendel

I would agree with most of this as I have also met him, yet its just the responses he gives that are full of s##t and smugly done has he actually thinks we will believe him I didn't believe hardly anything he said or says

That is owed by CCFC ltd so yes but it shows that even he knows obviously that holdings are 1 and the same