Search results

  1. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 1m Council QC has also been saying Sisu has sought to introduce new arguments that are not admissible.
  2. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 2m Council says ACL statement a private investor wouldn't go above 12m was not a council statement and was made during negotiations with bank.
  3. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Council QC says loan decision was rational and “made commercial sense”. Council QC arguing that Sisu plea to amend the grounds for their case should be rejected by the judge.
  4. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Judge says councillors still had to take into account the public interest, while being constrained by state aid law.
  5. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 3s Council QC also points to case which seems to show decision makers can be given too much information.
  6. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 23s Council QC going over EU case law now. Main thrust is advice to council must have been material misleading to breach state aid law.
  7. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Continues the football line saying his opposite number "went off the pitch if not beyond the stand" by adding in claims based on council officer Barry Hastie's report to councillors ahead of the vote on the £14.4m loan.
  8. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Council QC says Sisu moving the goalposts in the scope of their case.
  9. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 2m Judge says: "the statement that CCFC stopped paying rent unlawfully is not misleading."
  10. Sub

    Judicial review day 3 - judgement day

    Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 2m Sisu QC says council responding to wrong point after referencing CCFC rent strike in council report.
  11. Sub

    Ccfc impartial review

    nothing new though is it how often do they keep their promises ??:whistle:
  12. Sub

    Steven Pressley: I’m confident that we’ll have the squad I want come the start of the

    Sorry robo but i do not believe a word that he says at the moment, a club with no home no income from the fans, he will be on a shoe string budget getting what he can for nothing and all the players that are left after the quality players have been brought by other clubs.:(
  13. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Council QC says Sisu have taken blinkered approach. Ignored other ACL revenue streams and a potential return to the Ricoh to play in Nham
  14. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Court told the lowest £6.4m valuation of ACL’s lease was based on ACL never getting rent from CCFC or any other anchor tenants for the remaining 43 years of ACL’s Ricoh Arena lease
  15. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Now the Council QC says Sisu’s argument is riddled with fallacies.
  16. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Simon Gilbert @TheSimonGilbert · 17s Council QC says Sisu were dealing with the bank behind the council's back too. Sisu QC says there's no evidence for that.
  17. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Simon Gilbert @TheSimonGilbert · 44s Coun QC justifies length of £14.4m Council/ACL loan by saying council will earn £19.4m in interest alone over the 40 year term of the lease.
  18. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Yorkshire Bank’s planned £15.5m loan refinancing to ACL would have meant £1.3m annual repayments. The Australian bank which owned Yorkshire Bank did not want to write down the loan, Council QC tells court.
  19. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    Council QC tells court presentation to Labour councillors stated primary objective was to protect investment in ACL.
  20. Sub

    Judicial review thread - day 2

    opens fridge for a cold beer and chicken sandwich :D
Top