Search results

Absolutely and things would have to go absolutely horribly wrong for this to change. We have the most in our own hands run in of anyone, 4 games against competitors and 1 against a team with likely nothing to play for, it's only the Bristol City game where on paper we are in trouble. But while...

Fair enough I think we'd look alot safer with Portvale and Walsall winning, the only good result of the 4 was Crewe vs Crawley and even then its debatable if we'd have preferred that or a Crewe win.

If we win our next 2 I think we are safe and don't really need to worry about others, if we lose them or draw them though the table looks pretty terrible to me.

Of the 4 games we really cared about 2 were worst case scenarios, 1 was an average scenario and one you can argue was the average result or can argue it was the best result. The fact that we'd have been absolutely delighted with 4 teams all playing higher placed teams losing and none of them...

It was pretty damn bad, of the 5 teams (that played today) we are competing with to stay up 2 won and 3 drew. Sure Yeovil lost but that was mostly irrelevant already. while it could have been worse it was alot worse than you'd expect on average.

When you change your posting style to only post things you actually believe then I'll have a reasonable discussion with you. I'm sure you know how many holes are in both of your sentences without me pointing them out to you.

it's all about the revenues.....

no,CBRE are a massive company

Even if we ignore the fact what you posted wasn't even remotely a fact, even if we ignore the fact the situations aren't even remotely similar, even if we ignore the fact that CCFC building a stadium just outside the city wouldn't in anyway be Franchising and even if you'd had a reasonable point...

Damn, you're an idiot.

Discussing it's location is giving it credit though and is clearly doing what sisu want.

They aren't building a new stadium anywhere let alone Rugby, They have clearly just spoken to rugby to end the humiliation of the foi showing them to be misleading everyone, it's been 2 years and we are further away from buying land than they told us they were right at the start. It's getting...

Thats just creative sisu accounting, the club isn't worth that under any valuation method. It's reasonable to use a share price x number of shares = value method when those shares are traded.

We all thought Pressley was great too at one point.

I have no idea if it works to be honest, I just think that is the intention and on the face of it it's understandable if a slightly unfair rule. You'd have to do a large study I think to find out if it works and of course talk to teams about their game plans. I would think it encourages...

I don't think cricket works without that rule, I'm not sure I can explain what I mean but wouldn't we see almost every ball pitched far outside of leg stump and swinging back in, the batsman would almost always be in the way even though he wouldn't be standing in front of the stumps because of...

I thought the away goal rule was to make games more exciting, without that rule in a 2 legged tie the away team may attempt to shut up shop, get a draw and win at home, this rule discourages that and so attempts to make the football more interesting, while I certainly agree that it can be unfair...

:claping hands:

Awesome result:p

There is huge variance in costs but we don't need to know how much it's going to cost to know it's not viable, weather the stadium costs 100mill or 30mill, weather they can borrow money at 5% or 50%, there is no reasonable assumption scenario where building the new stadium is financially viable...