More trolling that brings this forum down.
*yawn*
Also it's quite obvious that this is an alias of someone else who adds PUSB to the end of his posts. Expect him to come in and agree with the OP very soon....
It's a loaded question designed to try and illicit a certain response. It doesn't seem to have worked.
It's not the first time they've tried to create a certain narrative either, one wonders what effect they are trying to cause.
Is this a new judicial review or the appeal of the old one that got thrown out and strongly critisised by the presiding judge?
If the former are we going to keep having Judicial Reviews until ACL run out of money?
Could use the megaphone to shout this:
“Two, four, six, eight, SISU's crime was very great! 'Great' meaning large or immense, we use it in the pejorative sense!”
SISU brought the needless administration/liquidation antics on themselves by not keeping up their side of a legally binding financial contract. People seem to forget that the club themselves mentioned administration and liquidation long before ACL "threatened" it.
People have also tweeted to him that people on the Hill got abused by fans exiting the stadium and he hasn't mentioned that. As I said before, very strange situation.