Search results

And they could both play that many games this season. Let's say we play 50 games next year. That's 4.500 minutes so 2.250 each, which is still a lot, especially if you want them to play at 100% all the time in such a demanding position. And there would likely be times where they play together...

It'll take a little while before people really start to notice how bad it is, and even then I think a large number of Trump fans will somehow still say its because of liberals, democrats and immigrants.

You don't seem to be getting that when we say rotation we're basically saying two first choices. Both would still feature heavily pretty much every game. They would still have some of the highest minutes on the pitch. And that's before considering a player being out injured.

Deliberately.

I do get about people liking a lower risk, lower return option. I was just saying that it would still be possible to put away a decent sum over the years in a savings ISA with the change in rules. Not like they've suddenly banned them.

Who said I supported having £20k in a stock ISA? I was merely pointing out the factual information it was there as an option, along with many other options.

Easily. If you want your full backs getting forward to support attacks and get crosses in then they'll be covering ridiculous amounts of ground at a high intensity. Just asking for muscle strains and tears, especially from Christmas onwards as the schedule becomes more crowded. Having both of...

Sillett.

It might make it a bit better but it wouldn't make it that exciting!

No-ones under any delusion of there being infinite money, but let's look at the evidence re Starmer/Reeves Their manifesto was all about fixing the black hole with growth by reducing regulation and red tape as well as other potential tax incentives. Since coming in they have consistently gone...

You will apparently still be able to save £5k tax free in an ISA. If you can do that over a 40yr working career that's still 200 grand with tax free interest. Plus other options to invest and save.

I've wondered since before the election is all the policy wonks that knew the Tories were getting wiped out jumped ship to save their own ass. Policy definitely started to become more right led leading up to the election and the manifesto certainly came across as something that had been written...

If they are any announcements I think it'd be tomorrow, beginning on the month and pre-season. Kids getting deals is an amuse bouche

Is that a euphemism and is it why everyone started talking about it?

Well they are quite similar names. I'm pretty sure Oggy was in goal for my first game - Torquay FA Cup 1988

This was my point. It wasn't about letting them fail, it was about making sure they had to a lot more to get it. I'm just advocating we should have used the system they are so keen to laud when it suits them. If you're in the shit and need help, we get to dictate the terms of it. The banks...

So if they do less hours those hours become available and we have more people in work do we not?

So we just wait for them to do it again? Cos they will. Like a naughty child given what they want they'll just keep on dong it knowing they'll get a way with it. Given them a smack and they stop. So do you want to put up with the short term problems now or have this same situation going on...

You've really fallen for the nonsense the rich have peddled so they can have more money haven't you? You talk about the jobs their money creates. Firstly, the argument was that the vast majority of their wealth is non-tangible and doesn't really exist so that money isn't getting spent anywhere...

Disagree about bailing out the banks being the right thing to do. They caused their own problems, so why should the taxpayers bail out an industry that supposedly believes in free market and 'dog eat dog'? It basically told them they can do what they like and fuck everyone over with no...