Search results

I'm guessing they do and to be fair you need a lot of space to house Troy Deeney's head and gut.

I'm guessing it's a better viewing angle, the view from the front is worse than further back for normal fans so I guess it's the same

Google thinks they may have to as well.

ones where all the cool kids hang out

Football for people who struggle concentrate through a whole tik tok video

Yes we lost because our performance was good enough and even with the tactics we used we should of been able to win but we could have made it easier for ourselves by playing in a way that was more suited to playing against a team with a low block. Low blocks are something we have traditionally...

This is it, most people like be fine but all it takes is one to even innocently post the wrong thing. Most forums I have been part of don't allow talk of upcoming and ongoing trials for that reason.

you can try something else without changing formation which is what I think we should do, against teams that aren't going to press Grimes and Sheaf need to be higher up the pitch. Against Plymouth Grimes and Allen were so deep they were basically allowed to pass the ball about by a Plymouth team...

The shape hasn't been found out, the roles the players do didn't work against Plymouth and their low block system. Grimes should for example have been starting 10 or 20 years further forward as there was no press to have to play through. Also i don't think you can say it was found out vs Hull...

I can see the gaps being far too big in the midfield If you are playing 3 cbs you need 2 in a 6 position as this is where a lot of 2nd balls will end up. Also with that formation you'll end with Rudi spending most of his game in fromnt of the defence which is not where you want him If we go 3...

It's cool, but I have said loads of times people will need to ask the club this as I'm not the person who can answer their questions yet people think I should. All I can say is the club have told Pete current safety regulations mean less people are allowed in hospitality than there are seats on...

He's just not Espresso enough at getting back.

If we had a full squad it's a back 4 with EMC on the left and Wright up top. Wingers to try and push their full back to cut down the number of crosses and Wright as his speed, skill and movement is better suited against their orc like CBs. If we do play 3 CBs we need to make sure it's 3-4-1-2...

You'll be surprised, legally you can talk about on going legal cases if you report the facts as per the case You may not think it's much but this is a large Coventry City forum and it's the case against a semi famous Coventry fan. Defence lawyers have collapsed cases on less before. Also due...

looking back at the line ups for thir recent games, they have lost against back 4s and beaten back 5s?

I get why people are thinking about 5 at the back but that may play into Lutons strengths, it allows them to push their wing backs high up the pitch at most times.

if binks plays he'll be in the middle, he was for a lot of the 5 at the back games under Lampard

Genuine question, how could Leicester have lost their manager when they had already lost Rodgers and were bumbking along with a temo manager in Dean Smith I believe? Also if Ipswich keep the level of player Burnley have then yeah but that is less likely, Philogene, Clarke, Phillips, Delap...

where they even doing that? the tunnel is right by there

Ah, for games where clubs think there will be a chance of away fans in home areas clubs do things like ask the other team to run a list of say first time purchasers through their own database to see if there is a match. Think we have done the same for games like Leicester in the past.