Search results

Yes but under seperat budgets. So why people are in which squad is apples and pears. If you have two development prospects you sometimes have to put better players around them to develop. Even if the better players never have a chance of making the first team. Fans are very first team...

Which is worth jack shit. 😂

I wouldn't apart from Collins if Wilson was fully fit. Your "scary bench" is a ambiguous comment, perhaps that played a part in my comment?

It was tragic. He was a great rider

Some of those might be contracted to the club but not in the first team squad

Allen Tavares and Paterson Maybe Howley and Burroughs too

Because fans know everything 😂 but have never managed a club in their life 😂

I will know about an hour before KO

Sanctions might stop them buying Gyokeres and MVE 😜

Well the rumour is he is not interested in a move to Manchester United. But Arsenal, Manchester City and Liverpool are monitoring his situation.

Yes, it is a lower release clause potentially, which may make him more of an attractive proposition for clubs It does mean we will get less of course.

They are in my recent posts I'm not going to keep repeating them just for you. Most the allegations go back over several seasons. The suggestion is Man City over inflated the value of revenues and sponsorships to get around the Prem Rules. If that was the case that means the accounts that...

Having beaten Sunderland a draw v Sheffield United, or Burnley would be good. Two draws or one win would be massive

This is my first post on them. People on here pre season were saying they were going to pan because they had to sell so many players. They haven't. Just like when Burnley first came down, they will pan because of financial difficulties - they didn't. The same when Leicester came down - they...

Never turn a draw away down whether it is a top or even a bottom team.

You picked the bench 😂

Let's face it you can't get your head around the seriousness of the allegations (why it has taken so long). Why it is so difficult to prove and they may not have breeched. Everton and Forest clearly overspent. It is clear in their accounts. Forest deliberately overspent expecting a fine...

You obviously don't understand the original allegations, why it has taken so long to investigate (because it's involved the clubs lawyers and individual people lawyers) and why the potential allegations are melting away. We are now at the tail end and coming to a conclusion. Nothing will have...

Because it's to do with financial regulations that applies to any business. That is the crucial pivot to proving most the allegations with Manchester City. If they can't prove the accounts historically submitted, audited and accepted were false, they can't prove the breaches of football...

It's well known the Manchester City allegations were always going to be difficult to prove just like they would be with any business - nothing to do with football rules. It's about financial regulations that apply to any business.