Search results

This is like the teleprinter update of current warfare as we peek through the window of rediffusion for the latest after we'd been shopping at topman for the new shirt we would be wearing that Saturday evening.

Mablethorpe again? I'll see you there.

There goes the last remnants of Hillfields.

There's a lot of history you're gonna have to pick through then, Capt. Best cancel your netflix subscription for the next 24 months if you genuinely want to catch up (and understand) this ancient war mongering shit.

Well done, Sick Boy - Peace is now in abundance in the Middle East courtesy of your latest gem (y)

:poop:

Seriously, WTF are you talking about?

Oh, Israel - Where millions of Arabs have lived since its inception? That Israel?

No worries, just read it again. As well as your own reasoning as to why aggression was directed at Jews in the first place.

Oooh, hang on then - I’m getting vibes of Brits getting angry over foreigners being afforded accommodation when they are not. Is that not allowed? Just OK in the Middle East at the tail end of the 1940’s?

Hmmmmm. Weren’t hostilities directed at them from the moment the state was established? In fact I’m pretty certain the British, French and Americans were fending off violent attacks from Arabs in the years preceding its state settlement. I’m not so sure the situation has always been as one sided...

Wow! What a childish retort 😮

What’s that got to do with the subtext of nuclear capability and its justification for ownership?

Well, when you are in a region surrounded by sworn enemies you’d kind of want to have the capability for deterrence, wouldn’t you? Or are you a fan of the one arm tied behind the back scenario?

I know - That lovable Iranian despot regime having an innocent kick about with a bit of fusion. Seems like you can’t do anything in the Middle East these days.

Come on George, what you got for us?

Calm down, tuppence. Impending nuclear holocaust has been averted by a little pre emptive action all whilst you were tucked up. If this has caused you a stir you won’t want hear about that Vik’s latest contractual manoeuvring.

Maybe because throughout the course of history, only the US has shown a willingness to use nuclear weapons?

Russia, China, N Korea?

Bobby Gould still pulling strings then. Thanks, Bobster.