Search results

When you're correct 100% of the time you don't need to answer questions. You just present them and ignore the replies.

Is this the new build or The Butts (which we're definitely moving to)?

Yep, justice has been served. #morals

The huh was because your previous post didn't make sense - however this reply makes the situation even less clear.

Wasps again! It's not about having new owners, new council because that isn't going to happen. It's about moving forward without constantly going over the same ground. As things stand SISU are the ones who hold the cards, as they need to decide what route the club is going to take. Why is...

Huh?

Oh please! You don't drive the tone of the forum but for absolutely no reason add Wasps into the amended reply.

The tone is driven by you. Take an objective look through the threads.

Yep, this type of reply is really really productive. Exactly what the situation. Good work Why as the owner/admin of this forum are you so quick in dragging every post into the same downwards spiral? Do you think continually looking backwards is going to assist moving things forward for...

Yep aware that efforts have been made to try and get the info from SISU for some time, but that's actually my point - the anger will achieve nothing but a reasoned approach could be progressed if in the right manner - the problem is that it all becomes a finger pointing melodrama of blame and...

The point I was ham-fistedly trying to make was is it not time we look towards pinning SISU down of what they're going to do. The hatred/anger towards CCC is totally valid but it's SISU who hold the answers - wouldn't energy best be spent getting answers to questions be more productive for...

And hating them achieves?

I just don't get what people hope to achieve by hating CCC. It's just wasted energy and the threads just rumble on with the same points/issues being raised but that ship has sailed. Yes people are entitled to feel however they want, but the could have/should have beens aren't going to...

As things stand today it is. The lawyers have said they may, not that they will progress to a further appeal. So, did you welcome the verdict that was reached? Justice served

Did you not welcome the verdict? Justice being served. All the pointless legal stuff resolved.

OK, you're going to have to point out where I said it was just you? Maybe you've deduced that whilst I've not actually said it, it's what I meant? Or just more spin to move away from the fact you've said the SBT statement welcomes the verdict, but it's actually the announcement it welcomes -...

Apparently, according to Nick, they're the same thing. Personally not quite sure how he's worked that out.

Yes it is spin. You've questioned why they've dealt with the two 'verdicts' different - well that'll be because the first one wasn't a verdict! They've made a release as the matter is now resolved and they're pointing out, as many are, that it's time to look forward. I did mention this...

Spin, spin, spin, spin. Allowing an appeal to progress isn't a verdict - it's not the conclusion - it's just a decision there are merits in an appeal being heard. However, why have you posted above that they'd said they welcomed the verdict when this isn't the case?

The release from SBT says - "The Sky Blue Trust welcomes the announcement of the Appeal Court verdict regarding the Judicial Review into Coventry City Council providing financial support for Arena Coventry Limited (ACL)." Why are people turning this to "We welcome the verdict"? The rest...