Search results

Basically the new Money launderings regulations focus on how the due diligence on clients old or new is done. Rather than a simple proof of identity (passport etc) professionals additionally have to adopt a risk based assessment of the client and key personnel. Looking at it from the outside I...

Not sure how many times it has to be explained. Legally Otium is a separate entity to SISU there is nothing at all that shows otherwise. What you are mistakenly taking as being the same entity is actually a description of being controlled by SISU in the decisions made. Like many companies not...

Surely as owners of the site the onus to produce plans etc is on CRFC at a time and a specification that suits them. Not sure how CCFC can drive the development and make decisions about planning, building etc when they are not owners of the site and only one of several potential tenants. "put...

the context of the whole article and his statements is the development of BPA not day to day operational opportunities........... for CCFC to be part of that development requires SISU (or new owners if appropriate) involvement

Deadlines already in place are - any relating to grounds included in the EFL regulations for all clubs - 28 February 2018 when the directors & Auditors have to sign the 2017 accounts off as a going concern

He is categorising things. He can see the things he only has to deal with the club for - rent of a little space on very short term basis that can be approved by Boddy or Fisher against long term commitments that require the close involvement of SISU. Which is why there is no conflict in what he...

CRFC are making the same distinction but instead of paying CCFC they are receiving from them, on a short term operational agreement just like you

Question Nick when you go to the match tonight are you dealing with CCFC or SISU?

Nick the club is paying to rent short term a small amount of space at BPA. It is extra income for CRFC with no long term commitment by either club. It is in the scheme of things insignificant. It is not a contradiction nor does it point to anything else going on It provides extra easy money for...

Look, legally SISU and Otium trading as CCFC are not the same entity. It is a matter of fact However it is also very clear that SISU as "owners" exercise the significant control over Otium and therefore CCFC. SISU do not make all the day to day operational decisions. However SISU sign off the...

The announcement on 17 August said they were above 4000 that leaves getting on for 5000 in terms of walk up home & away fans plus the corporate if they target 9000 on average. Also some season tickets carry little income as they are for the kids & JSB's etc. On an accountancy basis the income...

Just used it as a start point but a number of people I have talked to suggested it was around that. The principle works which ever number you pick. The League 2 stats seem to suggest that for most clubs (excluding Pompey) that's the top end of attendances and it would be reasonable to assume...

Just to put the averages in to perspective the only teams to average over 9000 attendance in League 2 in recent seasons are as follows 2012/13 Bradford 10322 2013/14 Portsmouth 15461 2014/15 Portsmouth 15242 2015/16 Portsmouth 16391 2016/17 Portsmouth 16823 & Plymouth 9652 I don't know what...

Just as a rough rule of thumb if the club budget for 9000 average attendance but they achieve 8000 that's going to cost them over the season around £200k net of VAT. That of course knocks on to the SCMP budget which would mean 120k less to spend on eligible players. At worst the need to offload...

Not quite true to say he had/has no connection to an address in Beckenham, Kent though is it. It is a matter of public record. There is also an address in London and in Essex

If a new stadium on that site were being considered..... Still be swapping one rented ground for another rented ground though wouldn't it. I cannot see CCFC ever owning a share of the site can you? Not going to be ready any time soon either, so doesn't solve immediate problems Also if BCFC...

According to the article today on BBC site the Treasury will fund 75% and Birmingham council 25%.

Two words to reply to that G the second of which is off.:)

Physical or verbal abuse is never right or helpful. There is no justification for it no matter how much you might "understand" the reasons behind it. Behaviour like this will continue to happen not because it is CCFC but because it is how a sizeable minority think that's the way to achieve...

the only responses should have been along the lines of "and the same to you Nazon" or "blessings to you too" The other guy should simply be banned and his account deleted. I take it he has been reported?