Search results

The problem is Martin Reeves - too much power

No too much embarrassment Unless the embarrassment can come first?

Last accounts show ,£18.3m with interest accruing at 4% over Barclays Base Rate

Well I suggest you will be writing to Martin Reeves. CEO at CCC , Chairman CWLEP and roaring success as a Director of ARENA Coventry

He will come back on your spelling of grammar 😁

I doubt it you are looking for upto £8.5m gamble for what reward? That's a lot if Taylor Walkers!

In essence -yes. The BH can instruct him call the loans in

They are expecting the £13m to be a Grant (non repayable) if they put that to pay Bonds it is enormous income boost

Bond Trustee on ADVFN he is acting on own discretion to not call in the loans from WASPs Would take 25% of Bonds to change that

If that happened Reeves and CCC would be gone. So self preservation will kick in- unless a miracle arrives

Hosting? There is about a week's judo and wrestling plus some 7 aside on an unused pitch Don't the Game's organisers also pay to use the facilities?

Unfortunately I am not in a position to disclose that - just accept I know

The CT could run two articles One good reason why WASPS should be bailed out One hundred and one why they shouldn't?

They don't have to infer as many of us know of refusals for applications more worthy than the WASPs. Perhaps they should ask Stratford DC to help our the ailing business, as they are operating there?

You are getting like Mr G 😉 I did not say anyone was being pushed aside because of or for the benefit of WASPs. What I questioned was why they feel they should be treated as a special case when they openly break financial regulations and agreements and particularly the Bonds and the Terms of the...

I didn't say you thought they were special. The thing is THEY think they are special and to some in CCC that is the case

Only one other Rugby Club makes a profit from the pure Rugby side - but they may not manage that this year

The grants you refer to are not just available for one off events. They are usually the result of a safety or similar national requirement It would seem WASPS , a privately run organisation wants public funds because they seem to feel they are a special case. Grenfell Tower and similar...

About as obvious as 2+2=5 Isnt that how WASPS fudged their accounts?

If they can clear nearly £14m of a £35m loan - they don't need a fantastic business plan!