Search results

Usually last to know as still working on 2 years ago accounts

G we will agree to disagree on your position Leave it there!

I said they agreed to spend £100k on pitch. They haven't!

Buying land requires the land owner agreeing to sell. I have been in many large property deals that change or fail at the last hurdle. That's not what you are saying though is it

Now answer my question in response to your comment

Are you saying my comment is not true? Careful G !

When did they last do that?

WASPs said they would spend £100k on pitch - so far £7k. That's a lot of sand - which is useless

How and why should they assist ? other than to remedy a WASPs failure and get a game on

In short they are not interested in CCFC problems nor willing to spend time or money on them

Well worked out! But if you apply that logic to the WASPs valuation it does not come to £60m

How does that answer my points?

Unless the proposed WMAC grant moves to any new owners why would anyone want the stadium £20m of dilaps?

How barmy is that? They will not get the ST money until the game is played. The walk up money is going to be lost in the main Not to mention the immediate £30k>£40k to play tomorrow in Burton

The road route is delayed at the CCC end - surprise!

They cannot do that arbitrarily

https://www.football365.com/news/opinion-coventry-city-cancellation-is-an-embarrassment-for-almost-all-concerned

There is no contract between CCFC fans and WASPS

DB has confirmed it has - quarter in advance

If paid your £1 then you are a member