Search results

What a pointless alternative to quote when it wasn’t a possibility. Labour living in an alternative reality. As usual. Prepared to waste public money. As usual.

Are you any good at pushing EVs?

If the money has been spent and is non returnable, isn’t it a bit daft to just cut the scheme without trying it out for a while. Unless you are dogmatically opposed to it in principle and worried it might actually have some impact? Labour has spanked the scheme as you so elegantly put it.

I’ve cast doubt on Starmer’s likely lack of longevity from the beginning. He is a patsy.

And Labour seem to be continuing that trend.

Just make sure you market your house at a reasonable price.

Will it be quicker, cleaner,cheqper?

An incredibly poorly supported railway station.

Or tied up in a mortgage in negative equity. Debt, not something productive at all. Quite the opposite in fact. People not able to sell the property for fear of crystalising the debt and creating another banking crisis like 2008. Would that be good for anyone?

The hyping up of football coverage has gone too far as well.

Falling property prices wouldn’t be evidence of a healthy economy either though.

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-14780659/Britains-booming-housing-markets-Rightmove-reveals-10-areas-sales-skyrocketed.html?ico=mol_desktop_news-newtab&molReferrerUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Findex.html&_gl=1*zkro4r*_gcl_au*MTQ4OTc1ODkxNC4xNzQ0Mjc5MTI5*...

The detail is all false? On what basis can you be so sure? Must be weird living in a world where you believe nothing but the Labour Party and others like yourself.

Nope. Losing control of the borders is the number of people arriving, not the cost consequence of them arriving i didn’t say I agreed with any of Starmer’s utterances published in Hansard. I’m suggesting it may be a more reliable and impartial information source than, say, Geebeebies. Other...

Was there an alleged impact on standards of living during those periods?

Population growth seems quite a lot higher than when most on here would consider to be optimum house price era of late 70s. QED?

Or worse, a big poor foreign child.

An expectation that change might actually mean change, not more of the same. If only we had known that the day before the election. so Hansard publishes any old shit?

I’ve given you a potential Hansard source FFS

Could be here https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2024-05-07/debates/64997110-88BF-4157-8177-D9687A25841B/IllegalImmigrationCosts