Search results

No they can't meet the criteria as far as we know although they might get the pitch ready

That's a difficult one though isn't it because they are in it and the ground isn't compliant.

It's was a question. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-65249178

Here we go again - incapable of civil interaction at any level

They have to ground share to meet the rules. Is it 20k capacity?

Yes but they still don't meet the regs

If they'd built a compliant stadium they would still be in L1 at best. They failed to get their ground in order and cheated the rest of us in the process

I know but it was well on the way. Where is the new Luton ground that's compliant with the regs that they've been 'building' for years?

I don't see the equivalence. For Luton it's the sisu new pitch you should be comparing to. A bit like Santa , God and the Tooth Fairy

Well....Wasps agreed that we had primacy over the use of the ground when in fact we were locked out. We paid full rent and Luton put the money instead into the team over seasons.

well, well, well. Cheats failed to spend on the ground and got the advatage on the pitch.

I know you win some and you lose some. You can't align the tea leaves in the real world.

That's the good part. We'd have done better with Max than Waggy as it turned out (for wahtever reason)

Whatever!

Actually you don't. It's disordered and you get get whoever you want to get when they're available. Dasilva in January for example - that didn't work out. This will all have been in the planning for months and months

his wage and his position.

You'd hope so but surely there was a strategy for replacing Tyler, Wags, Rose, Kane, Dabs anyway

now you're making it up. Jog on.

Ah yes, playing to the gallery? You're just so clever prolapse

I know!