Search results

It will be evident from who’s not on the subs bench on Sunday

Not sure this will happen now , been a delay I think

Yes one more coming in

Would expect Bidwell to be starting

Yes would expect so

At the very least a year loan with a lot of his wages being covered , so with one year left on his contract , he will not be on the wage bill

Yes

Will be the test I think unless we can get monies from player sales

No it totally was rubbish

Kane will be moved on Waghorn and Walker we have not had offers to cover enough of their wages to make it work Hamer and O’hare at the moment the offers we have had have not not be substantial to make it worth doing Moore could be involved to create cash but would be surprised

Because he does not really fit into the squad and we need to free up wages

To free up wages

I don’t think it matters , he will be going and it demonstrates we need to free up wages

I think we need his salary of payroll and we have been trying all pre season

The £5 million profit was part of that from Maddison and Wilson add ons or new players sold , I’m unsure if the accounts split out the difference

I’m unsure we have benefited much from McCallum the same as Bayliss and McNulty , they have not kicked on with their clubs triggering further payments Really Wilson and Maddison have been crucial ,the fact they are in the premiership and played for England since leaving has resulted in...

I’m not sure the it can be kicked as far as January to be honest , think it could be more immediate than that

This is now a normal in most transactions , clubs pay very little up front for a player , the selling club then agree to pay over 3/5years often back ended , the buying club then go and forward finance against this agreement , the selling club will often pay the fees associated to get the loan...

Think tomorrow’s starting 11 will be close to the Sunderland starting 11

This is quite normal within most transfers now and highlights the main concern with the deal