Search results

I’m not betting my life though. I’m proving that messiahs claim of a foot onside is nonsense. For that to not be true the pitch would have to look like it was mowed by a child on a sugar high.

I’ll also add - take a look at any photo of the Wembley pitch over the years. The accuracy of the grass pattern is spot on.

The same operation that marks out the pitch…. Or do we think the lines are all out of kilter too?

The point was to show that the earlier claim of Wright being a foot onside was clearly nonsense. The mow lines would have to be way out for that to be true. And let’s not forget these same ground men are also marking out the pitch lines. The result I gained is virtually identical to the...

I genuinely forgot he was even playing he was that non-existent.

You’re either trolling or genuinely this stupid and I’m not sure which is worse.

Do you and reality speak often?

FML Drawing the lines to a vanishing point allows you to correct for perspective. It’s evident you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about. Presumably these rails aren’t parallel either according to your logic….

It’s almost like VAR is capable of understanding perspective. That’s why you’ll always see the lines drawn to vanishing points. The debate is that you said it’s a fact that there’s a conspiracy. And I’ve shown that the only issue here is that you don’t understand perspective and that your...

Let’s go through this very slowly….. The red lines are drawn parallel to the grass mowing lines. The assumption here is that the groundsman has mowed close to parallel to the goal lines or perpendicular to the sidelines. Not too much a stretch given it’s the national stadium and the ground...

Off course the gap between the yellow and blue lines get bigger as it comes across. It’s called perspective. Look at the size of the light green shade of grass. See how that gets bigger too. Perspective. Is there a massive conspiracy against Coventry city or does MessiahRobins simply not...

Not a foot onside…..

Sorry but you’re making yourself look like a fool if you can’t understand perspective.

The referee could have easily decided that the arm was in an unnatural position, ball to arm etc.

You mean this one? Wright is not a foot inside here. It’s exactly the same as the other angle.

Go on - you show a still frame at the moment of ball release….

The footage from the other side showed nothing of the sort.

How on earth was that woke? You clearly don’t know what the word means. And “established fact”? Pull the other one.

Watched the full ITV coverage from second half onwards last night (and city unseen!) to check my sky blue tinted glasses from watching at Wembley. And yes we played some damn good football in that second half onwards and specifically when we brought on Binks, Torp and Tavares. Such a joy to...