Transfer Rumour Jahnoah Markelo (1 Viewer)

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2011
28,901
30,262
313
I agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.
We currenlty have a keeper with an ACL injury registered, a terrible overseas signing LB and a player whos not even fit for the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt smith

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2020
2,934
2,195
213
He says it in the interview

This is what I could find, obviously in a written snippet it doesn’t have everything he says but I’d love to hear that he said this was the best target out of 25 we were looking at and he’s always been our No.1, that will give me some reassurance. You’d have to assume surely Manneh was No.1 target originally as it’s something we’ve been hearing about for months



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2011
84,785
54,705
813
Folkestone
He will, it’s just the Swiss league was on a winter break. Hopefully start seeing him soon on the bench.
Well, if Saddles is right (not saying he is), he is saying we won't see Markelo this season..

Whether that's from insider information or just a guess, I don't know.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Apr 22, 2011
19,612
20,530
263
With EMC's injury (hopefully not too serious), maybe we'll see Markelo sooner than we expected!
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2016
4,875
7,060
263
One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.

I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.

It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

skyblue_55

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2014
840
1,243
143
If some are correct on our new signing , not possibly seeing him till next season , we seem to be very well off to place him with the likes of Wolfie , as that’s getting on nearly £10 mill playing no part ?
 

Boicey

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2023
1,600
1,598
213
There’s no inside info. Frank said he’s been on a break so we need to get his fitness up and he will have a part to play this season.
Frank wasn't that definitive. He just said he was rusty, unfit and bought as one permanent for the future amongst the loanees.
 

Balli001

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2022
4,409
4,105
313
One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.

I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.

It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
Yes but now we signed 2 more wingers it means we wont have to play Asante behind the striker as much.
 

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2020
2,934
2,195
213
One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.

I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.

It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..

Yeah but Bamford’s contract was only till January anyways


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2018
20,929
16,632
313
One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.

I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.

It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
Well why don't teams split the transfer budget? Set a percentage up for now, which the manager has a big say in, and part set aside for longer term projects? You can obviously change the split depending on a season (e.g. if you're looking strong for promotion and need some additions to bolster the current squad).
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2011
74,180
78,871
813
Coventry, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
This is what I could find, obviously in a written snippet it doesn’t have everything he says but I’d love to hear that he said this was the best target out of 25 we were looking at and he’s always been our No.1, that will give me some reassurance. You’d have to assume surely Manneh was No.1 target originally as it’s something we’ve been hearing about for months



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More weird quote that don’t really support the “manager has the final say” idea that’s vigorously defended on here.

IMG_5957.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ccfcisparks

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2012
17,586
13,200
313
Coventry
More weird quote that don’t really support the “manager has the final say” idea that’s vigorously defended on here.

View attachment 48931
The owner having ‘the final say’ is true for most, if not every single club. From this excerpt, it seems pretty clear to me that Lampard was involved to signing off on the transfer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sky Blue Goblin

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2011
74,180
78,871
813
Coventry, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
The owner having ‘the final say’ is true for most, if not every single club. From this excerpt, it seems pretty clear to me that Lampard was involved to signing off on the transfer.

Is it? What gives you that impression?

It’s more the “I trust Dean. I talk to Dean. My role as Head Coach is different”. To me seems more consistent with Robins quotes about signings and not being that involved in selection of players.
 

Balli001

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2022
4,409
4,105
313
Is it? What gives you that impression?

It’s more the “I trust Dean. I talk to Dean. My role as Head Coach is different”. To me seems more consistent with Robins quotes about signings and not being that involved in selection of players.
An interview markelo did in Dutch media said he had 2 teams calls with lampard prior to signing. Lampard even called him as he was about to sign elsewhere.
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2015
2,510
1,778
213
CV47
I think maybe people are misinterpreting what is meant by the owner having the final say,

I don't belief the owner will decide what positions need strengthening or which players are most suitable.

He will have the final say on value for money and what and when money can be spent
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2011
28,901
30,262
313
I think maybe people are misinterpreting what is meant by the owner having the final say,

I don't belief the owner will decide what positions need strengthening or which players are most suitable.

He will have the final say on value for money and what and when money can be spent
Yep exactly. Like he did with Bamford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sick Boy

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2011
19,394
18,259
313
I think maybe people are misinterpreting what is meant by the owner having the final say,

I don't belief the owner will decide what positions need strengthening or which players are most suitable.

He will have the final say on value for money and what and when money can be spent

Exactly. He signs off the cheques. Lampard had said he is involved in the decision making process to sign a player. It really is a silly myth that he doesn’t by some fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covcity4life

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2011
74,180
78,871
813
Coventry, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
Well it suggests Lampard is well involved in transfers which you initmated he wasnt

I’ve not claimed he has zero involvement. But everything from the club suggests it’s mostly about trusting Dean Austin and maybe the manager gives a once over at the end then Doug gives the final yes or no. Frank having a zoom chat doesn’t really change that opinion.
 

nicksar

Well-Known Member
Sep 14, 2014
995
1,538
193
I’ve not claimed he has zero involvement. But everything from the club suggests it’s mostly about trusting Dean Austin and maybe the manager gives a once over at the end then Doug gives the final yes or no. Frank having a zoom chat doesn’t really change that opinion.
It doesn't work quite like that but it's fair to say Dean Austin and his scouts do the majority of the recruitment/identifying possible signings work.
When the players finish training and have lunch before leaving for home Frank and his coaching team are at Ryton for several more hours.
He also arrives a couple of hours before the players rock up
 

Users who are viewing this thread