Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (6 Viewers)

SBT

Well-Known Member
Well I’ve heard a channel 4 spokesperson say it’s wrong, I’ve heard several people who used to work in the BBC say it’s wrong, I’ve heard an ex bbc employee and left wing Labour MP say it’s wrong, I’ve heard many anti Trump commentators say it’s wrong.
Surely in the interests of accuracy you should point out that there are indeed media people who think the situation has become overblown? I’m sure the Jeremy Vine show is very interesting though.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
It is unacceptable and what makes it really annoying it that it was completely unnecessary. Even if you play the speech in it's entirety it still comes across as someone trying to encourage an insurrection.

Instead because of this the likes of Trump and his cronies are getting to go around saying the BBC is just full of fake news (which it isn't) and that he is being victimised. It's given a man who should be in prison for trying to overthrow a government an excuse to claim he's the one that's been treated unfairly.

Exactly, someone couldn’t help themselves though. Everyone could tell the gist of what he was trying to do, whip up fury and unrest (all because his narcissism couldn’t accept defeat). But to remove “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” and march to “cheer on our brave congressmen and women” and put in the words “fight like hell” takes the narrative up another notch and whoever produced it would’ve known that.

A news related programme should just let the audience decide/form their own view, not unequivocally tell them the narrative they want them to follow. People get spoon fed opinions and clipped videos without context from press and social media constantly, some might prefer that as it works well in a world of echo chambers/ confirmation bias, but the BBC should be better than that and if they want to survive in their current form, they’ve got to be. I personally hope they can survive even if I hardly watch terrestrial tv these days
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Exactly, someone couldn’t help themselves though. Everyone could tell the gist of what he was trying to do, whip up fury and unrest (all because his narcissism couldn’t accept defeat). But to remove “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” and march to “cheer on our brave congressmen and women” and put in the words “fight like hell” takes the narrative up another notch and whoever produced it would’ve known that.

A news related programme should just let the audience decide/form their own view, not unequivocally tell them the narrative they want them to follow. People get spoon fed opinions and clipped videos without context from press and social media constantly, some might prefer that as it works well in a world of echo chambers/ confirmation bias, but the BBC should be better than that and if they want to survive in their current form, they’ve got to be. I personally hope they can survive even if I hardly watch terrestrial tv these days
Let’s be honest, this is a man recorded as having told 36,000 lies in his first term alone. That he’s suddenly getting precious because of being broadcast saying words he said is typical of the man.

If you can point me towards a more impartial news organisation in this country I’d love to see one. It’s a very hard job covering someone like him without being accused of bias in the first place.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Let’s be honest, this is a man recorded as having told 36,000 lies in his first term alone. That he’s suddenly getting precious because of being broadcast saying words he said is typical of the man.

If you can point me towards a more impartial news organisation in this country I’d love to see one. It’s a very hard job covering someone like him without being accused of bias in the first place.
He posts AI generated content on the official presidential social media accounts.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Let’s be honest, this is a man recorded as having told 36,000 lies in his first term alone. That he’s suddenly getting precious because of being broadcast saying words he said is typical of the man.

If you can point me towards a more impartial news organisation in this country I’d love to see one. It’s a very hard job covering someone like him without being accused of bias in the first place.

We all know how thin skinned Trump is and he will use any leverage possible to apply pressure to get his way, so why put yourselves in that position to start with ? It was done intentionally by someone that probably thought it was the right thing to do. As has been mentioned elsewhere it was totally unnecessary though as the facts/words were already there. Let the viewer decide on those, there was no need to make up a new sentence to try to make it sound even worse

The BBC/BBC world news disappearing would be a big loss, as they’re probably best of a bad bunch, that’s why they need to be better.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
which I get, but when you see it being torn to bits vs. a convicted criminal who glorifies sexual assault and shows daily that he's a pathological liar, it all feels a bit upside down.
It is and it’s completely unfair but it’s still the case
It’s like the church you can say we failed here and failed there but it should be above and beyond reproach. Life isn’t that easy though
 

SkyBlueMatt

Well-Known Member
I've seen the clips side by side on HIGNFY and it's not good. It's the kind of reporting that's expected from GB News or The Daily Heil, it is misleading and the BBC should be better.

Trump is a terrible human and unfit to be president, the sh*t he spouts is bad enough. There is no need to try to mislead and make it more reactionary.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Surely in the interests of accuracy you should point out that there are indeed media people who think the situation has become overblown? I’m sure the Jeremy Vine show is very interesting though.
The man once called a 'bike nonce'.

Have you seen some of the videos of him on his bike riding without regard to other road users that he posts.

He behaves like he believes he is entitled to special treatment and other people matter less.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Surely in the interests of accuracy you should point out that there are indeed media people who think the situation has become overblown? I’m sure the Jeremy Vine show is very interesting though.

Oh dear
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Read the transcript of the entire speech (as already posted) and you tell me what his intent was.

Ok let’s get into the detail here. Has Trump been found guilty of incitement to violence?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I've seen the clips side by side on HIGNFY and it's not good. It's the kind of reporting that's expected from GB News or The Daily Heil, it is misleading and the BBC should be better.

Trump is a terrible human and unfit to be president, the sh*t he spouts is bad enough. There is no need to try to mislead and make it more reactionary.
How about their coverage of The Palestine or non coverage of lsreal's genocide.
 

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
The BBC is and has been politically biased for at least the last 35 years.
Yes, they had to cut the speech but could and should have done it in a better way. The Orange idiot clearly wanted to incite violence and an insurrection with the speech the ‘cheer on out brave senators’ line was definitely double edged but that doesn’t justify what they did.
It comes down to trust on what they are broadcasting and this incident does erode that trust a little more in much the same way as it has with the way that they have portrayed Brexit, covid and it’s fallout, Israel’s behaviour etc etc.
Its a slippery slope and needs people in there to install a straight bat mentality with their reporting whether the staff agree with it or not.
 

SkyBlueMatt

Well-Known Member
How about their coverage of The Palestine or non coverage of lsreal's genocide.

My post was only focused on how they edited Trumps speech. Their inability to cover the genocide of Palestinians or their bias towards Israel is a completely different discussion. One topic that I now shy away from because all it does is anger me.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The irony is that the Prescott memo includes claims of much more widespread and serious malpractice going on at BBC Arabic in terms of their coverage of the October 7 attacks, but they appear to have got a fraction of the coverage from the rest of the media. A Trump soundbite that didn’t include enough white flashes has been deemed to be far more important.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
The irony is that the Prescott memo includes claims of much more widespread and serious malpractice going on at BBC Arabic in terms of their coverage of the October 7 attacks, but they appear to have got a fraction of the coverage from the rest of the media. A Trump soundbite that didn’t include enough white flashes has been deemed to be far more important.
Going to cost them, something, maybe he'll accept a gesture of innocence via Andrew's testimony to the House committee?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The irony is that the Prescott memo includes claims of much more widespread and serious malpractice going on at BBC Arabic in terms of their coverage of the October 7 attacks, but they appear to have got a fraction of the coverage from the rest of the media. A Trump soundbite that didn’t include enough white flashes has been deemed to be far more important.
Look it’s fine, Trump only wants to sue them for a half Masterchef.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Look it’s fine, Trump only wants to sue them for a half Masterchef.
Some incredible stuff coming out. Fascinating to watch how people are responding to this compared to other instances when news channels have had to issue corrections.

John Simpson reporting. "Donald Trump’s demand for a billion dollars from the BBC comes from a local Florida law firm. It was sent to the wrong address, and the writer didn’t know what ‘salacious’ really means: ‘Due to their salacious nature, the fabricated statements that were aired by the BBC…'"

Also if you look at payouts in this country he'd be lucky to get £200K if he won, although Peston reports legal advice given to the BBC is Trump's case has no chance of success.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Some incredible stuff coming out. Fascinating to watch how people are responding to this compared to other instances when news channels have had to issue corrections.

John Simpson reporting. "Donald Trump’s demand for a billion dollars from the BBC comes from a local Florida law firm. It was sent to the wrong address, and the writer didn’t know what ‘salacious’ really means: ‘Due to their salacious nature, the fabricated statements that were aired by the BBC…'"

Also if you look at payouts in this country he'd be lucky to get £200K if he won, although Peston reports legal advice given to the BBC is Trump's case has no chance of success.
He’s filed loads of lawsuits against media organisations, both as a form of intimidation of the press, and to enrich himself through the presidency. The former is blatant authoritarianism. The ‘settlements’ are in effect bribes paid by the organisations for him to leave them alone and broadcast what he wants.

Genuinely, there are people who will see no problem with that on here just because it’s him doing it. FOX favourably edited an interview where he hesitated on wanting to release the Epstein files, then he sued someone else for the way they edited a Kamala Harris interview.

Fascist piece of shit he is.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Fascist piece of shit he is.


Donald Trump Thumbs Up GIF by UFC
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The Prescott memo claimed the coverage was biased because there was no equivalent program on Kamala Harris.

Yeah real head scratcher that, Michael.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The Prescott memo claimed the coverage was biased because there was no equivalent program on Kamala Harris.

Yeah real head scratcher that, Michael.
The closest thing would be showing her speech conceding the election, accepting that her opponent won, and hoping for a smooth transition of power.

None of which Trump himself managed to say when he lost.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The Prescott memo claimed the coverage was biased because there was no equivalent program on Kamala Harris.

Yeah real head scratcher that, Michael.
The whole thing is a true pot pourri of reheated right-wing talking points, random micro-managing moans about individual stories, and some genuine controversies (largely ignored)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top