Match Thread Stoke City - Coventry City Match Thread - Saturday 8th Nov (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Fact.
He can take second place in the queue behind Wagner’s lackey to sniff Lampard’s fingers after he lifts the league trophy.
Getting into attacking positions I would say, which we do constantly.What exactly does “playing for corners and long throw ins” look like Mark?!
Baffled by some saying Stoke has better chances when they didn't have a single shot on goal.
I think you've just made that up!
It is amusing to find Stoke moaning about another team being effective from set pieces, given the best spell they've had in the last 50 years was built around such tactics. I imagine MR is probably also kicking himself that he didn't make the most of MVE's throw ins when he was managing him.
We mix it up and are pragmatic.
I also think that one of the ways that we've countered Rudoni being out is to go a bit more direct. It's worked.
I just think he’s an iffy defender
Results are stats.
Wasn’t that their own player?
How many pages would there be if you took out every comment with "cuck", "bedwetter", etc in them?
This forum wouldn't have much traffic at all if you took all that out.
What exactly does “playing for corners and long throw ins” look like Mark?!
If you mean “playing deep in the opposition half, leveraging tricky wingers to create width and hit the byline to stick balls in” - then yes Mark, you’re right, we do just play for corners and long throws
He was always a bit like that. But he was on our side so it didn’t matter.
It's the bit where he says "they've seen they can get results playing that way." Maybe he should have seen it then
Is winning throw ins and corners against the rules now? I love Mark, but it’s finding a way to win games away from usual style. Something we never really did on his watch…
Has anyone mentioned the Away support today ?
12th Man. Was exceptional.
12th Man. Was exceptional.
Making too much noise and upsetting the stoke players apparently
Well as far as I know its never been reported anywhere, but feel free to post a link if it has. As such, if he had applied for the Stoke job the only people that would have known would have been MR and the Stoke owner, and not some random poster on a football messageboard.
.just have come from. The leak in the city backroom staff that DK sacked
Obviously I can't post a link, but I do know it's true...no worries and zero point in debating it tbh.
Disappointed with MR’s comments. Definitely some sour grapes from the manager who set his team up not to lose.
I thought better of him.
I thought better of him.
Frank Lampard's Coventry City 2 - Mark Robins's Stoke City -0, he can't get the better of Frank.
fuck 'em, salty tears and sour grapes taste fucking sweet to me!!
fuck 'em, salty tears and sour grapes taste fucking sweet to me!!
We could try and do what his side did and cram 10 players in front of the keeper I suppose.It's the bit where he says "they've seen they can get results playing that way." Maybe he should have seen it then
Ultimately, I'm not surprised Mark is bitter. He's lost two us twice now.
Must have been horrid watching us celebrate with Frank like that.
It helps set Frank apart from Mark. He shows the passion and is one of us celebrating. It used to disappoint me when Mark would clap and walk off so quickly even after massive wins.
Must have been horrid watching us celebrate with Frank like that.
It helps set Frank apart from Mark. He shows the passion and is one of us celebrating. It used to disappoint me when Mark would clap and walk off so quickly even after massive wins.
I was there today. Despite not creating many clear cut chances it was an incredibly dominant performance. Possession ,Territory , Energy & Skill was all Coventry.
Do you not think King might have mentioned this when under a shit load of fire for the decision?
The tone of this comment is not becoming of a former science teacher.
Even if it did make me chuckle.
