SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Nonce fanboy, you think defending women's right are right wing and want men in women’s toilets. That’s about as weird as it gets, time to take a good look in the mirror
Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (15 Viewers)
- Thread starter tisza
- Start date
mmttww
Well-Known Member
You're right,
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Boosh dom? That all you’ve got, me and him laugh at it regularly tbh it’s quite embarrassing on your behalf. You have been crying about people putting flags up for weeks so stop bullshitting, you just hate the fact someone disagrees with you and calls you out
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Says the guy who thinks women should not be allowed safe spaces. Just fuck off you weirdo.
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Calls me a nonce fanboy for things in the media that have no evidence yet doesn’t want women to have safe spaces and men in women’s toilets. Hahahaha fucking hell that’s so weird
mmttww
Well-Known Member
I've found it pretty funny tbf, boosh. Video you posted and deleted earlier of someone dropping their phone while running after someone and screaming 'c*nt' at them was a LOL.
duffer
Well-Known Member
You're literally the fanboy of a nonce who just set back women's rights over their own bodies by decades.
The man who also said, "Just grab them by the pussy".
Oh, bless, you're too stupid to realise what an absolute hypocrite you are.
It's all a bit embarrassing really, you were doing better when you just posted pictures of your favourite nonce dancing, maybe you should go back to that.
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Just hope I don’t annoy you too much so you get angry and message me like you did with my mate, what a lovely gesture that was of you he appreciated it
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
You literally don’t want safe women spaces and men in women’s toilets…..creep. I think that’s slightly more weird than supporting the president of the USA, also all them claims have no evidence
mmttww
Well-Known Member
It's hard to get annoyed by someone that's a figment of someone else's imagination. It would be cool if people could actually talk about stuff without your act taking up this much space but no one's stopping you.
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
What it’s a forum, I can reply to someone if I want? You trying to imply that it should only be one way on here?
mmttww
Well-Known Member
No, I'm saying straight up that it would probably be better on here if your Dom character wasn't sucking up so much oxygen.
duffer
Well-Known Member
Mate, I'm sorry if it hurts, but you are a nonce fanboy, the evidence is quite clear and it isn't going away. What's weird are the contortions you're going through to try to justify it - you'll do yourself an injury mate.
As for supporting women's rights, your favourite nonce isn't big on that either, so either you're pretending that you care about women's rights, or you're pretending to support nonce's approach to them by denying them rights to their own bodies and sexually assaulting them.
Simple question, which is it?
duffer
Well-Known Member
Where have I said anything of the sort?
As for nonce, what he's said and done are literally a matter of record, you lunatic.
I'm coming to the conclusion that you're just a bit, well, thick and maybe I'm being cruel to you by exposing it on here. Must be terrible for your self-esteem.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I personally wouldn’t want a man in an open changing room exposing his genitals in front of women if they felt frightened and intimidated- if you do your a pretty strange guy who clearly reviles women - don’t you “mate”
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Wow some sad fucker on a football forum called ‘duffer’ called me thick, really hurt my feelings you have I don’t know what I’ll do with myself! Tbh I know you are a clown because you’ve put @Grendel on ignore because he always calls you out
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes it's not nice being told that you're a child rape sympathiser is it?
'Stop being so over sensitive'.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I don’t think I have been accused of such?
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
'Nonce fanboy' no?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
We are talking about here Dave?
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Ah shit, maybe he does deserve that Nobel peace prize after all - he has found a way to reduce crime levels and best of all it can be applied to any city in the world. Genius.
Otis
Well-Known Member
duffer
Well-Known Member
Naah, I've put him on ignore because he's a tedious WUM.
I tried, I really did, but in the end it was just too boring to deal with.
Pity, because I sensed there was a vague glimmer of intelligence there at least. Ho hum.
You're comedy gold though, so you're safe, nonce fanboy.
Reading your posts is like watching those fail videos on YouTube. You can't believe some people are so dangerously stupid, and yet there they go, sawing off the branch they're sitting on whilst gurning for the camera.
It's sad, scary, and yet hilarious and utterly compelling. Keep 'em coming, nonce fanboy. x
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Very creepy strange individual
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
I’d wait until this has played out properly because Lucy Connolly is supposedly considering legal action against the police. The jist of it being that a) the misrepresented what she said to the CPS and b) manipulated her into pleading guilty. A police corruption unit is investigating statements she made. All that aside, it’s obvious that some of the sentences dished out to protesters last summer were disproportionately harsh. Again, compare that to some of the things chanted and disorder at pro-Palestine demos too. Starmer politically wanted to nip the disorder in the butt and show she was ‘tough’ in the face of the protest
Pete, Tony, a 31 month sentence for a deleted tweet (however distasteful) should not outrank violent crime. At the same time, this Labour government was responsible for releasing seasoned criminals early and new criminals convicted actual violent crimes given more lenient sentence is ridiculous to most people.
He hasn't been charged yet, so no.
Who was the tweet aimed at? No one specifically. It was an unfunny joke. Using your own logic, anyone who says 'punch a fascist in the face' would also constitute incitement. This, of course, would be ridiculous and a curtailment of free speech.
The man hasn't been charged with an offence (yet) so as of right now, there is no crime to answer for. What I would say, you may champion this example but the law its current form could be flipped and used against you. For example, should the police arrest the hundreds of people tweeting violent threats to JK Rowling (or anyone)?
mmttww
Well-Known Member
I take the point about sentences for violent crimes, but that doesn't mean her sentence was excessive. Might mean sentences for violent crime are too lenient. Two things aren't connected.
and saying Labour were responsible for the early releases in May is a bit reductive. An independent report by a former Conservative MP said more could be released than Labour allowed.
Same report said just building new prison places wouldn't solve certain issues, and Labour inherited a system that was overcrowded with a growing population. I'm not a lover of their record or their leader(s) but that was not their mess.
and this isn't at you but FFS if we just legalised drugs we'd solve so many problems and save so much money incl. prison overcrowding. More room for violent criminals on longer sentences. Bosh! sorted.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I am deeply uncomfortable that the tories put the legislation that meant Lucy Connolly and others like her serve significant time in jail for what they wrote or said not for what they did
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
What do you feel would have been an appropriate sentence based on the current sentencing guidelines for a category A1 offence taking into account the fact she did not initially plead guilty and therefore would not be eligible for the full reduction for a guilty plea?
The guidelines are a starting point of 3 years’ custody and a range from 2 to 6 years.
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
As you should be, my fundamental premise that when it comes to freedom of speech, all speech is protected.
It’s perverse that speech, at any level, can be punished harsher than actual violent crimes.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
This is the problem. The legislation exists and is being applied.
Rather than complaining about an individual case or two tier policing people need to be calling for legislative change. But that's not a simple soundbite as it will require a conversation about where the line should actually be.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Even in the US there are limitations, though just for libel/defamation I think. I agree with the second sentence though for sure.
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
Which is reasonable as that’s the only speech that can cause “harm”.
The people defending this with the line ‘it’s the law’ seem to not identify that the problem is the laws themself. They could easily be weaponised to prosecute people in other ways.