I don't know why I entertain you because you talk some real rubbish and are constantly deflecting away from the real issue of the other forwards but if we are to play your game where watching games with your eyes is banned (as anyone with functioning ones can see Wright is better off the left), you also have to separate him playing in a 2 up top from playing through the middle in a 3 as they are completely different.
But wouldn't you expect a player to score more (quite a few more) playing as an out and out striker than on the left drifting in?
Not for debate? Are you new on here? Some on here would prefer to argue night is day than admit there's a 1% chance of being wrong on something.
You got it
Yes exactly. If EMC gets injured for example, it will mean Wright will go straight in at LW.
I suppose i wouldn't be surprised to see a CF that can also go right side for that reason, rather than 2 separate signings. Giving us that option to shuffle the pack with 1 more player rather than 2.
Of course it's an option. It's always best to have players that can play in more than 1 position. But to try and make out that it's best to take up the option without any injuries and play a striker on the left leaving the left winger without a place on the pitch is absolute madness.
What are you on about? It's called having options. Calling him a striker is gaslighting to try and make a point as we can all see he's a strong left sided player.
Dunno but it might upset a few clowns who don't understand squad rotation as well as some Simms fans.
Are you saying Wright should play on the left when we have EMC fit or do you agree with me that Wright should play as striker in the middle and EMC on the left when both are fit?
Especially if we have to sign Wright again to play in both positions.
Sigh... at the moment he should play through the middle because him there with EMC is going to be better than either one of them on the left with Simms or BTA. It's not that hard to grasp, neither of those strikers are good enough.
Then it wouldn’t be a player’s best position by definition?
With the current squad, yes. The point I’ve been making is that we need wingers more than strikers. We have 3 strikers behind Haji in the pecking order and unless we make a sale, we won’t bring anyone in. Personally, I’d sell BTA and look to bring in a player who is cross functional like the Belgian striker we were linked with who actually plays RW/LW/ST.
The 3 strikers behind Wright arnt going to score 20 goals between them, we need better.
All this waffle to deflect attention away from the other strikers is genuinely staggering from you. I've made the point he's been forced to play through the middle more because the other strikers are hopeless, highlighted by Lampard not touching them with a 10ft pole in the play offs.
So you've spent all this time trying to have an argument with me then admit you agree with me
No I've literally said it from the start, for weeks and months actually. As I said, I'm not sure what you were struggling with tbh.So you've spent all this time trying to have an argument with me then admit you agree with me
Go find another idiot to try and have an argument with.
I've even said it all today. We need another striker when those you're trying to defend were saying we don't need a striker but a winger.
Yes, far more dynamic from the left but I appear to have entered an alternate reality where that's not the case.
Do we want Wright on the left taking the place of EMC where he scores less goals or playing in the middle where he scores more goals?
