Do you want to discuss boring politics? (24 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Loving the guys posting about serious proven economics while peddling reheated discredited Chicago School stuff.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Huge strategic error by Reeves and Starmer to impose massive tariffs on UK exports to the United States imo

Huge error to claim the March figures were down to Government strategy when it was artificial growth ahead of the tariffs.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I too was shocked that the government would try to take credit for economic growth - pure insanity

So by your own logic they accept responsibility the other way. Reeves said in March the plan was working. So now Reeves must accept it reality it is not and the forecast of reduced growth against yesterdays speech. This is a new honest straight talking government isn't it?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You are wrong, it's pointless talking to you

It seems they will in reality increase forms of taxation though

Spending review assumes that all councils will hike taxes by 5%, warns IFS​

Paul Johnson now warns the chancellor's spending review has a "sting in the tail" - which is that it relies on all English councils raising tax by 5% every year.
This would lead to bills rising at their "fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05", he says.
The IFS director explains: "Local government in England did perhaps a little better than it might have expected – it has so often been at the back of the queue.
"Its core 'spending power' is set to rise by 2.6% a year from next year. There is a sting in the tail though. This assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year.
"Indeed, if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most are likely to – bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05.
"That might not be so bad if it weren’t for the fact that those bills are based on property values in 1991, and that the system is regressive."
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
So by your own logic they accept responsibility the other way. Reeves said in March the plan was working. So now Reeves must accept it reality it is not and the forecast of reduced growth against yesterdays speech. This is a new honest straight talking government isn't it?
Lol yes I’m sure the resignation letter will be on Starmer’s desk by this afternoon
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Lol yes I’m sure the resignation letter will be on Starmer’s desk by this afternoon

Strange response.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Lol yes I’m sure the resignation letter will be on Starmer’s desk by this afternoon

Will have to get behind Miliband who is definitely on the way out and didn’t just get one of if not the largest cash settlement of all ministers for their agenda.

The right wing info bubble is just fan fiction these days.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Will have to get behind Miliband who is definitely on the way out and didn’t just get one of if not the largest cash settlement of all ministers for their agenda.

The right wing info bubble is just fan fiction these days.

Paul Johnson is right wing?

Genuinely are you OK? You seem more unhinged every day.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
My Economics background is a fantastic C grade A Level from 35 years ago. That still probably trumps most and my knowledge level is the square root of fek all.

We're very lucky to have such revered Economists posting on this board, especially those who are experts on almost all aspects of politics and post in such a condescending manner to anyone who disagrees.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
My Economics background is a fantastic C grade A Level from 35 years ago. That still probably trumps most and my knowledge level is the square root of fek all.

We're very lucky to have such revered Economists posting on this board, especially those who are experts on almost all aspects of politics and post in such a condescending manner to anyone who disagrees.

We’ve had 14 years of your economics and it’s been an unmitigated disaster. Hearing the same myths and nonsense spouted that we heard in 2010 to justify it all grates a little TBH.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
We’ve had 14 years of your economics and it’s been an unmitigated disaster. Hearing the same myths and nonsense spouted that we heard in 2010 to justify it all grates a little TBH.
I didn't realise I was in charge, but that's exactly the kind of response I'd expect.

Lots of things weren't great which is why we had a change, but included in that was initially a coalition, then Brexit and then Covid with a worldwide collapse and half the country on furlough. Many mistakes in other areas, but Economically I don't think they could have done much more.

Also had to contend with many on strike or threatening strike (largely because all these lovely socialists wanted more for themselves) ;)
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
It's not government spending it's borrowing.

You should find out how banks create money from nothing, biggest scam ever. If you have a mortgage you're paying intrest on that magic money. 🤭
The government sells bonds to the private sector, it doesn't need to. It is a choice.
It seems they will in reality increase forms of taxation though

Spending review assumes that all councils will hike taxes by 5%, warns IFS​

Paul Johnson now warns the chancellor's spending review has a "sting in the tail" - which is that it relies on all English councils raising tax by 5% every year.
This would lead to bills rising at their "fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05", he says.
The IFS director explains: "Local government in England did perhaps a little better than it might have expected – it has so often been at the back of the queue.
"Its core 'spending power' is set to rise by 2.6% a year from next year. There is a sting in the tail though. This assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year.
"Indeed, if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most are likely to – bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05.
"That might not be so bad if it weren’t for the fact that those bills are based on property values in 1991, and that the system is regressive."
Yeah I heard this last night, it's quite underhand really but politically I suppose it makes sense to pass the blame onto Reform led councils
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
It's not government spending it's borrowing.

You should find out how banks create money from nothing, biggest scam ever. If you have a mortgage you're paying intrest on that magic money. 🤭
100% agree.

Between fractional reserve banking and quantative easing the whole global financial system is a corrupt scam designed to keep the bankers in control.

The banks lend money they don't have and charge interest on that non existant money that keeps the working class in jobs they don't like for their entire lives, if you default on that loan they seize your home which they then sell for money that does exist ???
It's totally fucked up. If you do keep up with the payments you are using real money to repay non existent money, while at the same time paying tax to the government for the privilege of working to pay your bank "debt" (which the bank never even had)
If you work 5 days a week and pay 40% tax, then you are working for the tax man 2 days a week, BEFORE you even start paying interest on the non existant money that the bank "loaned" to you.

How fucked up is that?

Countries that over spend or over comit can borrow on the international markets (money that doesn't exist) until the repayments become unaffordable, then they can just print more of their own currency, until that currency becomes de-valued and inflation cripples their economy.
 
Last edited:

fatso

Well-Known Member
In the real world money is created every day through government spending, that is a fact. Here is some research into how it all works


I'll give you your due, consistently clueless whether on or off topic

Proof your talking your usual bollocks.

New government spending commitments are almost always followed by increases in taxes or borrowing.

Your living in cuckoo land if you believe differently.

Your post has one thing right, any government that has its own currency and central bank can print its own money, (that's called quantative easing) the reason it isnt done routinely is that it de-values that currency and leads to rampant inflation.

The article you linked to conveniently chose to ignore the pitfalls of their theory!

If you don't understand that then at least ask yourself why it hasn't been done previously to wipe out our national debt?
 
Last edited:

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member

Proof your talking your usual bollocks.

New government spending commitments are almost always followed by increases in taxes or borrowing.

Your living in cuckoo land if you believe differently.

Your post has one thing right, any government that has its own currency and central bank can print its own money, (that's called quantative easing) the reason it isnt done routinely is that it de-values that currency and leads to rampant inflation.

The article you linked to conveniently chose to ignore the pitfalls of their theory!

If you don't understand that then at least ask yourself why it hasn't been done previously to wipe out our national debt?
Your comprehension is just abysmal
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
100% agree.

Between fractional reserve banking and quantative easing the whole global financial system is a corrupt scam designed to keep the bankers in control.

The banks lend money they don't have and charge interest on that non existant money that keeps the working class in jobs they don't like for their entire lives, if you default on that loan they seize your home which they then sell for money that does exist ???
It's totally fucked up. If you do keep up with the payments you are using real money to repay non existent money, while at the same time paying tax to the government for the privilege of working to pay your bank "debt" (which the bank never even had)
If you work 5 days a week and pay 40% tax, then you are working for the tax man 2 days a week, BEFORE you even start paying interest on the non existant money that the bank "loaned" to you.

How fucked up is that?

Countries that over spend or over comit can borrow on the international markets (money that doesn't exist) until the repayments become unaffordable, then they can just print more of their own currency, until that currency becomes de-valued and inflation cripples their economy.
You get so close to working it out, then fuck it at the last minute by blaming it on having to work two days for the tax man before you start earning.

you identify bankers as a big part of the problem. And do you know whose version of economics they side with...?

And just for clarity we've used QE twice in the last generation. Once for covid (which is fair enough, even if you can argue about the way it was used) and the other to dig the banks out of self-inflicted, greedy black hole. So as far as I'm concerned if we can laden the country with debt in perpetuity for that we can certainly do it to make ourselves energy secure and build infrastructure.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Top