Duggins (3 Viewers)

Nick

Administrator
Seems he has made a statement again. Shouldn't be allowed to speak in public.




He just repeats the strange Twitter accounts who know every single line of judgement paperwork. "read the judgement, the council did nothing wrong"

He says the EC stuff caused the breakdown of talks, contradicts what wasps said.

Also seems to say the Ricoh would have been built even without ccfc because of regeneration.
 

Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
Who lets him release this stuff, writes like a petulant child. "Let me temporarily occupy a parallel universe" stay there you twat.
It seems he already does occupy one. The pr return is lacking, at least Lucas did a proper job with it.

He also admits he doesn't really know what happened in the Westminster meeting he didn't show up to.
 

Lord_Nampil

Well-Known Member
Time to move on!! Forget the Ricoh allowing sisu to sell us and for us to be a club again! Clear the new ground won’t be in cov now but we just need to just do it!!! It’s going to be crap for a few years but It will benefit us in the long run! If Robins stays as well doing what he’s doing more fans will eventually go to watch out the city!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
giphy.gif
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
A list of quotes, yet strangely missing the quotes surrounding both a pathway to ownership and the subsequent statement that the sale would not put at risk the security and future of CCFC. He’s full of shite.
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
He is now calling sisu misogynistic... 1) he resorts to slander with no basis 2) the fucking CEO is a woman you twat.

I dont remember them ever saying the legal council was a minute taker (but may have missed it) but I do believe they made the point of why he wasn't there?
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
Why is no mention made of buying land in the city? Especially the woodlands site? They are very insistent on us being at the Ricoh, but are not working on the possible other solution.
 

Nick

Administrator
Imagine having to send out the council social media accounts to clean up after duggins. It's ironic.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Ha! Can see those accounts stand out a mile. They're the only ones who are obviously not actual City fans. Why did they think doing the same crap as 2013 would work again.
 

Nick

Administrator
Ha! Can see those accounts stand out a mile. They're the only ones who are obviously not actual City fans. Why did they think doing the same crap as 2013 would work again.
They are pretty desperate, trying to reply to every negative comment.

The CET article about it is a bit misleading also.
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
if we managed to fluke 2 promotions back to the top flight, you can imagine the council and Wasps but be crawling all over the football club
at that point i would quite happily continue at St Andrews and tell them where they can stick the Ricoh
When Sheff Utd got promoted this season, SSN interviewed some councillor from round them ways. They estimated (not football club money) that them being in the Prem bought around an extra £40m revenue to the local community. Are our council too thick too understand this?? Oh wait, yes they are
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
How Gilbert can refer to Ridley as Duggins’ opposition is beyond belief. Labour and Tories speak with one voice for one reason. They know the whole council, all of them, are in the shit if the EC finds they have done wrong, and they are not confident in the correctness of their own actions. Sisu do not have any ongoing legal action and they have no control over the EC investigation. What they are clearly doing is reserving the right to take further action IF the EC finds evidence of malfeasance. That is an entirely reasonable thing to do. Protests should rightly be aimed at the council in general, and Duggins and Ridley in particular, as leading architects of where my team finds itself.
 
Last edited:

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
How Gilbert can refer to Ridley as Duggins’ opposition is beyond belief. Labour and Tories speak with one voice for one reason. They know the whole council, all of them, are in the shit if the EC finds they have done wrong, and they are not confident in the correctness of their own actions. Sisu do not have any ongoing legal action and they have no control over the EC investigation. What they are clearly doing is reserving the right to take further action IF the EC finds evidence if malfeasance. That is an anti rely reasonable thing to do. Protests should rightly be aimed at the council in general, and Duggins and Ridley in particular, as leading architects of where my team finds itself.
The council aren't in the shit if they lose its us council tax payers that are
 

Nick

Administrator
How Gilbert can refer to Ridley as Duggins’ opposition is beyond belief. Labour and Tories speak with one voice for one reason. They know the whole council, all of them, are in the shit if the EC finds they have done wrong, and they are not confident in the correctness of their own actions. Sisu do not have any ongoing legal action and they have no control over the EC investigation. What they are clearly doing is reserving the right to take further action IF the EC finds evidence if malfeasance. That is an anti rely reasonable thing to do. Protests should rightly be aimed at the council in general, and Duggins and Ridley in particular, as leading architects of where my team finds itself.
Didn't sisu sign something to call off all legal action going forward about the sale of the ricoh?
 

Nick

Administrator
Strange how there's not much mention of that while the council are going on about dropping legal action, not even to say it was made up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top