Rfc (1 Viewer)

blueflint

Well-Known Member
well we are finished with SISU's evidence in the JR where is the damning revelation you boasted about knowing as i can't see it
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Not in court, better things to do with my time @ The Ricoh!

So has what you suspected come out yet RFC? Or were there things not mentioned that you expected?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
So has what you suspected come out yet RFC? Or were there things not mentioned that you expected?


The evidence actually was a case of a Sisu executive going into a room and finding a man with his pants down, playing cricket, though not with a straight bat. He was a loan. Next to him lay a smoking gun, which was concealed behind a smoke screen. The window would be open and into the room on this windy day would have been all bluster. On the pants man's desk would be an Airfix model of the Ricoh, which would be in solvent.

On the floor would be a large briefcase, tatty and past its best. A judge would then walk in, accuse everyone of sabotage and then throw out the case.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
The evidence actually was a case of a Sisu executive going into a room and finding a man with his pants down, playing cricket, though not with a straight bat. He was a loan. Next to him lay a smoking gun, which was concealed behind a smoke screen. The window would be open and into the room on this windy day would have been all bluster. On the pants man's desk would be an Airfix model of the Ricoh, which would be in solvent.

On the floor would be a large briefcase, tatty and past its best. A judge would then walk in, accuse everyone of sabotage and then throw out the case.

Too much sun today Otis? ;-)
 

RFC

Well-Known Member
So has what you suspected come out yet RFC? Or were there things not mentioned that you expected?

Have been far too busy but caught up with a guy who's attended for the past couple of days and said he'd listened intently but found it hard to read the Judges thoughts but thought he appeared to favour CCC.

Not everything I expected has come out but perhaps it was ruled none permissible evidence.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Have been far too busy but caught up with a guy who's attended for the past couple of days and said he'd listened intently but found it hard to read the Judges thoughts but thought he appeared to favour CCC.

Not everything I expected has come out but perhaps it was ruled none permissible evidence.

Non permissible evidence?

Is that another way of saying it was 'bullshit?'
 

ecky

Well-Known Member
Have been far too busy but caught up with a guy who's attended for the past couple of days and said he'd listened intently but found it hard to read the Judges thoughts but thought he appeared to favour CCC.


Not everything I expected has come out but perhaps it was ruled none permissible evidence.

Time for you to come over from the dark side?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Have been far too busy but caught up with a guy who's attended for the past couple of days and said he'd listened intently but found it hard to read the Judges thoughts but thought he appeared to favour CCC.

Not everything I expected has come out but perhaps it was ruled none permissible evidence.

Thanks for the reply.
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
Non permissible evidence?

Is that another way of saying it was 'bullshit?'

I thought that was the whole idea of the JR to get out into the open all the shit we wer'nt privvy to? what a waste of fucking effort its all been
 

I was eleven in 87

Well-Known Member
RFC....

On the basis that the Judge will not take into account or comment on the "Non permissible evidence", can you now at least tell us exactly what this "Non permissible evidence" was??
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
He was convinced a deal would of been done on the court steps.

No such luck and no revealing news also.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top