what should our back 4 be against brentford ?? (1 Viewer)

[coventry is my faith]

I think it should be - christie=right back, adams=left back, clarke=center back, webster/seaborne=centre back. What do you think ??? #pusb

 

---

[ccfc92]

I'd go with that. clarke along side maybe seaborne could work.


But tbh, a 1 or 2 goal loss will be a result on saturday. Brentford will be desperate to pick up points, especially after wolves lost on tuesday

 

[stupot07]

We'll concede goals whoever plays.

I'd be tempted to go back to christie, Clarke, Webster, Adams


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[ccfc92]

We'll concede goals whoever plays.

I'd be tempted to go back to christie, Clarke, Webster, Adams


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

who's quicker out of webster and seaborne?

 

[ccfc92]

Sorry to go on a tangent, but maybe a holding midfielder that could help out in defence and support the midfield would be better for this game?

a 4-1-3-2

or a 4-1-4-1?

 

[stupot07]

who's quicker out of webster and seaborne?

No idea.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[stupot07]

Sorry to go on a tangent, but maybe a holding midfielder that could help out in defence and support the midfield would be better for this game?

a 4-1-3-2

or a 4-1-4-1?

Probably, but we haven't really got one. And he flip side is that with only 1 up to the balls not going to stick and Wilson will get isolated. I'd probably stick with the 442.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[ccfc92]

No idea.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

sorry, I meant a better defender. With Clarke in the team, at least there's some pace in the back 4. SO who's the better defender between seaborne and webster?

 

[ccfc92]

Probably, but we haven't really got one. And he flip side is that with only 1 up to the balls not going to stick and Wilson will get isolated. I'd probably stick with the 442.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Barton or McGeough?

agreed it will isolate the one up top. but unfortunately it's a choice of counter, or go all out.

go all out = goals conceded for CCFC

 

[Grendel]

Willis Clarke Webster Adams.

 

[mark82]

How about:

Christie Clarke Willis Adams

 

[johnwillomagic]

Christie, Webster, Clarke, Adams for me they know each other and have been our most settled back four though granted we have conceeded a few with that back four during the season.

 

[Nathccfc]

Isn't seabourne still banned??

 

[stupot07]

Barton or McGeough?

agreed it will isolate the one up top. but unfortunately it's a choice of counter, or go all out.

go all out = goals conceded for CCFC

We did try defending with two defensive fullbacks, we've also played with 5 man midfield (due to injuries) and still conceded.

I think McGeough is more an attacking midfielder, and bartons not really a dm either. To be honest neither of our centre mids particularly push forward hence why never have scored all season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[Warwickhunt]

an 8ft fence on the goal line

 

[wingy]

Phillips Clarke Willis Adams .

On another note SP Is suggesting he get a loanee midfielder In If Fleck gets another booking In either of the next two games .

Seems a little unnecessary IMO ,surely he trusts Barton to cover one game?

 

[Huckerby]

Gary Breen, Gary Breen, Gary Breen, Gary Breen!!

Then probably try Breen and Breen on both wings, with Gary Breen in defensive mid and Breen playing just behind Gary and Gary Breen up top!

Might even give Gary Breen a bash in goal?

 

[Noggin]

The club can't afford one Gary Breen, Having a full team of Gary Breens is just a dream.

 

[savosdad]

Bricks and mortar the only way

 

[sw88]

RB Christie (i think Phillips will offer more but he's not even on the bench at the minute is he? So not a chance of starting IMO).

CB Clarke

CB Seabourne (more pace than Webster, although probably just as error prone)

Adams (no contest)

 

[skybluetony176]

I think we need a back 5 myself. I can see us taking a spanking otherwise. A draw will be a good result.

 

[sw88]

I think we need a back 5 myself. I can see us taking a spanking otherwise. A draw will be a good result.

Need a back 11 the way we leak goals

Then again, Wilson needs to be up top so we should play 9-0-1

 

[Sky Blue Harry H]

Oakey Gillespie Peake Pearce (Stuart not Andy!) - = shut out:claping hands:

 

[Steve.B50]

I think it should be - christie=right back, adams=left back, clarke=center back, webster/seaborne=centre back. What do you think ??? #pusb

The commando regiment.