Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
88,386
43,166
813
Sorry to be obvious, but buildings & land usually is pretty immobile.. nevertheless they're worth having as assets..

Indeed and the evidence is that pubic owned assets tend to perform poorly compared to those in the private sector.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
The bastards are moving to Northampton!
DSC_0467.jpg
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2013
8,702
5,424
313
Indeed and the evidence is that pubic owned assets tend to perform poorly compared to those in the private sector.

I agree, and yet Sisu's incompetence has created a unique situation where their privately owned sports business has performed worse than a publically owned arena.

Quite an achievement.
 

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
Mar 19, 2011
3,539
101
48
Scunthorpe
Indeed and the evidence is that pubic owned assets tend to perform poorly compared to those in the private sector.
You would just love it if Shitzu/Avro/ whoever got their hands on the Ricoh would you not? BUT have you thought about the future of the Ricoh under their ownership?????
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2013
34,559
17,295
313
I agree, and yet Sisu's incompetence has created a unique situation where their privately owned sports business has performed worse than a publically owned arena.

Quite an achievement.

that takes a special kind of management, hence the huge management fee's the club pays it's owners.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2011
4,805
115
63
I agree, and yet Sisu's incompetence has created a unique situation where their privately owned sports business has performed worse than a publically owned arena.

Quite an achievement.
Well yeah but then what's new with Sisu? Strangely East Coast Trains has performed better under state ownership than private.
http://www.mediacentre.eastcoast.co...LISHES-FINANCIAL-RESULTS-FOR-2012-13-3e5.aspx
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/apr/18/east-coast-rail-line-taxpayer-subsidy
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
88,386
43,166
813

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
88,386
43,166
813
You would just love it if Shitzu/Avro/ whoever got their hands on the Ricoh would you not? BUT have you thought about the future of the Ricoh under their ownership?????

Why would anyone think of an ugly concrete lump in Foleshill? What an odd thing to say.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2011
4,805
115
63
There is no state aid here? Even with rolling stock and line maintenance
Never said that there was no state aid, but almost every Train Operating Company receives a subsidy and East Coast is no exception. East Coast just requires less than the others since going back into public ownership.

guardian said:
The state-run East Coast rail service requires less public subsidy than any of the 15 privately run rail franchises in Britain, according to a report from the rail regulator.

The report comes after the coalition government pledged to push the London to Edinburgh line back into private hands before the next election, with a new operator taking over by February 2015.

The route has been under the control of the Department for Transport since November 2009 after the transport company National Express pulled out.

While about half of all train operating companies paid premiums to the government last year, the report shows that passengers on every franchise were in effect subsidised when money spent on infrastructure was included. However, the net subsidy for East Coast was 1% of the line's income, compared with an average of 32%.
 

Users who are viewing this thread