sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return (3 Viewers)

Mr T - Sukka! · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

2. the so called offer of talks is a cruel but understandable gimmick being played on by both sides to gather the fans backing, there is no intention of either party backing down as the situation is not salvageable.

To be blunt if we use the analogy of a boxing match we are in the 12th round and each boxer is about to fall to the floor, what do you do? there is no point either boxer simply bending to his knees after 11 rounds and simply give up the fight! no they both slug it out knowing they could lose, but its the only choice.

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

I hope I'm proven wrong as both sides are completely ruining the club, however I also have wish that we see out at least 1 year at sixfields, i have to admit, i love it there, the atmosphere may not be of the old days at Highfield Road but then at least it is not as horribly downbeat and tense as the Ricoh. The team seem to be shining due tot he lack of pressure on them at Sixfields, and the closeness to the pitch, the management and players is a real added bonus. If it aint broke dont fix it, thats the number one rule in life.

I also like the Mr Fisher and the rest of the Coventry City so called bigwigs sit with us, and they are approachable, I have found Mr Fisher and his wife to be lovely people who are human, some of the rubbish thrown at them is out of order. If you dont want to go to Sixfields that is your choice, but on the field Otium, Sisu, whatever you want to call them are getting it right. I support Otium, the team, the Club! When will other people see what this city Council is doing to our club? wake up - open your eyes

Duh! Duh! Duh! Another one bites the dust!

mark82 · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
I think True Sky Blues point was that the judicial review would be made again, no no no you all shouted that cant be done, they would need to appeal. Well you were all wrong and TSB was right after all! now they have submitted the new JR Claim and this time they can avoid the strike out from last time. Thats the way to do JRs. TSB if i remember did explain about the public consultation process being flawed on this particular occasion making the payment/agreement unlawful. I think i agree with TSB the council cannot use large amounts of monies from the taxes (not grants) (not euro grants) to prop up or steady a business it owns or has part ownership in - you will see. SISU do not fuck around, look at Ms Seppalas background - they do this for a living - JRs - Takeovers- forcing businesses into the ground to overpower them, using the lawful methods to do so - - you are all going to be very surprised by the outcome of all of this i promise you, the council are heading for their worst shit storm ever

The key thing is that Sisu have a good track record in court cases. They are a lot of things but legally naive isn't one of them.

Will they win? Who knows, but they obviously think they have a chance else they wouldn't be chucking money at it.

ohitsaidwalker king power · Oct 30, 2013

mark82 said:
The key thing is that Sisu have a good track record in court cases. They are a lot of things but legally naive isn't one of them.

Will they win? Who knows, but they obviously think they have a chance else they wouldn't be chucking money at it.

Might be a gamble. Based on a business acquisition plan?

mark82 · Oct 30, 2013

ohitsaidwalker king power said:
Might be a gamble. Based on a business acquisition plan?

Maybe so. I'm just making the point that they do have a good track record in court cases. It's what they do best. Even better than destroying football clubs.

Tonylinc · Oct 30, 2013

I want to know this posters legal experience since to me his comments seem to be sh-t.

blueflint · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
what a lot of silly boy childish remarks, lots of swearing from little men.

I know what im on about, ill be proven correct absolutely. The judicial review by the way is a NEW REVIEW not an appeal, therefore there is no need to prove the first JR Judge was plainly wrong. I think another member here some time ago tried to explain that to some of the numb brains here and you didnt get it that time either! he was correct though

sorry to blow a hole in your bubble the JR is an appeal nothing more they can't bring a new one as the old one is still ongoing donkey brain

Ripbuster · Oct 30, 2013

Tonylinc said:
I want to know this posters legal experience since to me his comments seem to be sh-t.

As far as I can see,He thinks a JR is a charactor out of Dallas

Tonylinc · Oct 30, 2013

FAO Sixfieldsfan.........Does the fact that you have yet to gain any "likes", tell you something?

mark82 · Oct 30, 2013

Tonylinc said:
I want to know this posters legal experience since to me his comments seem to be sh-t.

He's clearly a WUM with a name like that.

mark82 · Oct 30, 2013

blueflint said:
sorry to blow a hole in your bubble the JR is an appeal nothing more they can't bring a new one as the old one is still ongoing donkey brain

Both wrong actually. It's only a hearing to decide if a judicial review is granted.

blueflint · Oct 30, 2013

mark82 said:
Both wrong actually. It's only a hearing to decide if a judicial review is granted.

which in all affect is an appeal

No future with SISU · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

2. the so called offer of talks is a cruel but understandable gimmick being played on by both sides to gather the fans backing, there is no intention of either party backing down as the situation is not salvageable.

To be blunt if we use the analogy of a boxing match we are in the 12th round and each boxer is about to fall to the floor, what do you do? there is no point either boxer simply bending to his knees after 11 rounds and simply give up the fight! no they both slug it out knowing they could lose, but its the only choice.

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

I hope I'm proven wrong as both sides are completely ruining the club, however I also have wish that we see out at least 1 year at sixfields, i have to admit, i love it there, the atmosphere may not be of the old days at Highfield Road but then at least it is not as horribly downbeat and tense as the Ricoh. The team seem to be shining due tot he lack of pressure on them at Sixfields, and the closeness to the pitch, the management and players is a real added bonus. If it aint broke dont fix it, thats the number one rule in life.

I also like the Mr Fisher and the rest of the Coventry City so called bigwigs sit with us, and they are approachable, I have found Mr Fisher and his wife to be lovely people who are human, some of the rubbish thrown at them is out of order. If you dont want to go to Sixfields that is your choice, but on the field Otium, Sisu, whatever you want to call them are getting it right. I support Otium, the team, the Club! When will other people see what this city Council is doing to our club? wake up - open your eyes

The council leader talks of events in the new year, are they going to sell to someone else?

Sba180 · Oct 30, 2013

has to be fisher

letsallsingtogether · Oct 30, 2013

Well you better enjoy it because if what he said is right then CCFC are fucked.

RFC said:
I think you may well be right but who knows? Will be there on Saturday, best of luck to Steven & the Boys.
PUSB!

No future with SISU · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
I think True Sky Blues point was that the judicial review would be made again, no no no you all shouted that cant be done, they would need to appeal. Well you were all wrong and TSB was right after all! now they have submitted the new JR Claim and this time they can avoid the strike out from last time. Thats the way to do JRs. TSB if i remember did explain about the public consultation process being flawed on this particular occasion making the payment/agreement unlawful. I think i agree with TSB the council cannot use large amounts of monies from the taxes (not grants) (not euro grants) to prop up or steady a business it owns or has part ownership in - you will see. SISU do not fuck around, look at Ms Seppalas background - they do this for a living - JRs - Takeovers- forcing businesses into the ground to overpower them, using the lawful methods to do so - - you are all going to be very surprised by the outcome of all of this i promise you, the council are heading for their worst shit storm ever

You are so full of rubbish, the council did not use taxes to prop up acl they took out a cheap loan and then lent it to acl. By the way Tim Fisher is no good at his job as he estimated 3,000 to 7,000 supporters at sixfields and is totaly wrong.

skybluefred · Oct 30, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

2. the so called offer of talks is a cruel but understandable gimmick being played on by both sides to gather the fans backing, there is no intention of either party backing down as the situation is not salvageable.

To be blunt if we use the analogy of a boxing match we are in the 12th round and each boxer is about to fall to the floor, what do you do? there is no point either boxer simply bending to his knees after 11 rounds and simply give up the fight! no they both slug it out knowing they could lose, but its the only choice.

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

I hope I'm proven wrong as both sides are completely ruining the club, however I also have wish that we see out at least 1 year at sixfields, i have to admit, i love it there, the atmosphere may not be of the old days at Highfield Road but then at least it is not as horribly downbeat and tense as the Ricoh. The team seem to be shining due tot he lack of pressure on them at Sixfields, and the closeness to the pitch, the management and players is a real added bonus. If it aint broke dont fix it, thats the number one rule in life.

I also like the Mr Fisher and the rest of the Coventry City so called bigwigs sit with us, and they are approachable, I have found Mr Fisher and his wife to be lovely people who are human, some of the rubbish thrown at them is out of order. If you dont want to go to Sixfields that is your choice, but on the field Otium, Sisu, whatever you want to call them are getting it right. I support Otium, the team, the Club! When will other people see what this city Council is doing to our club? wake up - open your eyes

Have you ever tried talking out of your mouth instead of your backside.

:blue::blue::blue::blue:

win9nut · Oct 30, 2013

Sixfieldsfan: I just want to thank you. Your posts are so funny, I pissed myself laughing.

PUSB

dongonzalos · Oct 30, 2013

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

wake up - open your eyes[/QUOTE]

Mr Justice Males' reasons for refusing permission for the application to proceed to a full judicial review state.

"I am not persuaded that there is an arguable case that the loan by the council constituted an unlawful state aid.

"It was made on commercial terms, in order to protect the council's investment in ACL, in circumstances where ACL's bank was threatening to hold ACL in default.

"The alternatives would appear to have been either the insolvency of ACL which (largely because the claimants had caused rent to be withheld as a means of exerting pressure in the commercial negotiations, which had led to an unsatisfied judgment of the High Court in ACL's favour) was not in a position to pay the loan, or acceptance of the claimants' proposals which the council did not consider to be in its commercial interests.

"It is clear from public statements made by members of the council, in particular councillor Mutton, that at least some members (of the council) have a strong animosity towards the claimants.

"However, I do not accept that this demonstrates that the council made its decision to offer a loan to ACL for an improper purpose or in bad faith.

"Its purpose was the legitimate commercial purpose of protecting investment in ACL.

"The claim that the decision was ultra vires (unlawful) is dependent on a showing of an improper purpose and therefore has no independent life once it is determined that the council's purpose was not improper."

His decision states, if the Sisu companies as claimants do not seek an appeal, the council's court costs should be paid by the Sisu companies.

tonyok · Oct 30, 2013

Toss.........

sixfieldsfan · Oct 31, 2013

dongonzalos said:
The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

wake up - open your eyes

Mr Justice Males' reasons for refusing permission for the application to proceed to a full judicial review state.

"I am not persuaded that there is an arguable case that the loan by the council constituted an unlawful state aid.

"It was made on commercial terms, in order to protect the council's investment in ACL, in circumstances where ACL's bank was threatening to hold ACL in default.

"The alternatives would appear to have been either the insolvency of ACL which (largely because the claimants had caused rent to be withheld as a means of exerting pressure in the commercial negotiations, which had led to an unsatisfied judgment of the High Court in ACL's favour) was not in a position to pay the loan, or acceptance of the claimants' proposals which the council did not consider to be in its commercial interests.

"It is clear from public statements made by members of the council, in particular councillor Mutton, that at least some members (of the council) have a strong animosity towards the claimants.

"However, I do not accept that this demonstrates that the council made its decision to offer a loan to ACL for an improper purpose or in bad faith.

"Its purpose was the legitimate commercial purpose of protecting investment in ACL.

"The claim that the decision was ultra vires (unlawful) is dependent on a showing of an improper purpose and therefore has no independent life once it is determined that the council's purpose was not improper."

His decision states, if the Sisu companies as claimants do not seek an appeal, the council's court costs should be paid by the Sisu companies.[/QUOTE]

but the costs are nothing to Sisu!! they can brush that off. it is a new claim as far as i know

shmmeee · Oct 31, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
but the costs are nothing to Sisu!! they can brush that off. it is a new claim as far as i know

It's a request for more information for the appeal to the original (and only) JR, it's not a new claim.

skybluetony176 · Oct 31, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
Mr Justice Males' reasons for refusing permission for the application to proceed to a full judicial review state.

"I am not persuaded that there is an arguable case that the loan by the council constituted an unlawful state aid.

"It was made on commercial terms, in order to protect the council's investment in ACL, in circumstances where ACL's bank was threatening to hold ACL in default.

"The alternatives would appear to have been either the insolvency of ACL which (largely because the claimants had caused rent to be withheld as a means of exerting pressure in the commercial negotiations, which had led to an unsatisfied judgment of the High Court in ACL's favour) was not in a position to pay the loan, or acceptance of the claimants' proposals which the council did not consider to be in its commercial interests.

"It is clear from public statements made by members of the council, in particular councillor Mutton, that at least some members (of the council) have a strong animosity towards the claimants.

"However, I do not accept that this demonstrates that the council made its decision to offer a loan to ACL for an improper purpose or in bad faith.

"Its purpose was the legitimate commercial purpose of protecting investment in ACL.

"The claim that the decision was ultra vires (unlawful) is dependent on a showing of an improper purpose and therefore has no independent life once it is determined that the council's purpose was not improper."

His decision states, if the Sisu companies as claimants do not seek an appeal, the council's court costs should be paid by the Sisu companies.

but the costs are nothing to Sisu!! they can brush that off. it is a new claim as far as i know[/QUOTE]

ointlaugh:

Grendel · Oct 31, 2013

skybluetony176 said:
but the costs are nothing to Sisu!! they can brush that off. it is a new claim as far as i know

ointlaugh:[/QUOTE]

On this of course he is right -- history suggests the council will now have more litigation coming there way than they have ever has before.

GaryPendrysEyes · Oct 31, 2013

Grendel said:
ointlaugh:

On this of course he is right -- history suggests the council will now have more litigation coming there way than they have ever has before.[/QUOTE]

Yes, as was reportedly threatened by Sisu in a Telegraph report. That's what unethical bullies try and do.

Matty_CCFC · Oct 31, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

2. the so called offer of talks is a cruel but understandable gimmick being played on by both sides to gather the fans backing, there is no intention of either party backing down as the situation is not salvageable.

To be blunt if we use the analogy of a boxing match we are in the 12th round and each boxer is about to fall to the floor, what do you do? there is no point either boxer simply bending to his knees after 11 rounds and simply give up the fight! no they both slug it out knowing they could lose, but its the only choice.

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

I hope I'm proven wrong as both sides are completely ruining the club, however I also have wish that we see out at least 1 year at sixfields, i have to admit, i love it there, the atmosphere may not be of the old days at Highfield Road but then at least it is not as horribly downbeat and tense as the Ricoh. The team seem to be shining due tot he lack of pressure on them at Sixfields, and the closeness to the pitch, the management and players is a real added bonus. If it aint broke dont fix it, thats the number one rule in life.

I also like the Mr Fisher and the rest of the Coventry City so called bigwigs sit with us, and they are approachable, I have found Mr Fisher and his wife to be lovely people who are human, some of the rubbish thrown at them is out of order. If you dont want to go to Sixfields that is your choice, but on the field Otium, Sisu, whatever you want to call them are getting it right. I support Otium, the team, the Club! When will other people see what this city Council is doing to our club? wake up - open your eyes

You have been on here before under a differernt name.
Your the chap from Hinckley who started who set up a web site.

oldskyblue58 · Oct 31, 2013

Think these details of JR procedures might be useful

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/rc...nistrative-court/applying-for-judicial-review

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part54

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/courts/administrative-court/judicial-review.pdf section 11 would seem to deal with what is going on 28/11/13

thaiskyblue · Oct 31, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
I think True Sky Blues point was that the judicial review would be made again, no no no you all shouted that cant be done, they would need to appeal. Well you were all wrong and TSB was right after all! now they have submitted the new JR Claim and this time they can avoid the strike out from last time. Thats the way to do JRs. TSB if i remember did explain about the public consultation process being flawed on this particular occasion making the payment/agreement unlawful. I think i agree with TSB the council cannot use large amounts of monies from the taxes (not grants) (not euro grants) to prop up or steady a business it owns or has part ownership in - you will see. SISU do not fuck around, look at Ms Seppalas background - they do this for a living - JRs - Takeovers- forcing businesses into the ground to overpower them, using the lawful methods to do so - - you are all going to be very surprised by the outcome of all of this i promise you, the council are heading for their worst shit storm ever

you utter twat, do one .

robbieray · Nov 1, 2013

Why is the council meeting with her then?

Tank Top · Nov 1, 2013

hill83 said:

"OOOOHHH, Language Matron"

st john · Nov 1, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

Oh really?

Mary_Mungo_Midge · Nov 1, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqs1YXfdtGE

WillieStanley · Nov 1, 2013

jas365 said:
Saw the name of the OP and immediately thought of this:

I havent stopped staring at this is for, like, 15 hours. Entranced.

ecky · Nov 1, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
I think True Sky Blues point was that the judicial review would be made again, no no no you all shouted that cant be done, they would need to appeal. Well you were all wrong and TSB was right after all! now they have submitted the new JR Claim and this time they can avoid the strike out from last time. Thats the way to do JRs. TSB if i remember did explain about the public consultation process being flawed on this particular occasion making the payment/agreement unlawful. I think i agree with TSB the council cannot use large amounts of monies from the taxes (not grants) (not euro grants) to prop up or steady a business it owns or has part ownership in - you will see. SISU do not fuck around, look at Ms Seppalas background - they do this for a living - JRs - Takeovers- forcing businesses into the ground to overpower them, using the lawful methods to do so - - you are all going to be very surprised by the outcome of all of this i promise you, the council are heading for their worst shit storm ever

this is garbage there is a new thread out......

DaleM · Nov 2, 2013

sixfieldsfan said:
sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return, i am new here, i am not sisu or acl, i'm a city fan and thats all. But i do have a little legal knowledge. I can assure you of two matters of fact.

1. the council are in trouble with the judicial review, sisu are very likely to win this time around, though it will most likely be after about 6 months of legal tangling yet.

2. the so called offer of talks is a cruel but understandable gimmick being played on by both sides to gather the fans backing, there is no intention of either party backing down as the situation is not salvageable.

To be blunt if we use the analogy of a boxing match we are in the 12th round and each boxer is about to fall to the floor, what do you do? there is no point either boxer simply bending to his knees after 11 rounds and simply give up the fight! no they both slug it out knowing they could lose, but its the only choice.

The council in my opinion will lose this battle, or they will at least be the side begging the club to buy or rent. I have been informed by Mr Fisher that the club is never going to rent the Ricoh and the Ex Council Leader Mr Mutton told me the council will never sell. The key is the Judicial Review, if the Judge agrees with the big boy barristers for Otium over the cheaper Barristers for the council (not forgetting ACL), and my personal opinion for all thats worth, the council illegally provided ACL with monies from the public to the tune of £14 million without any public consultation at all, and only with the intention of forcing a way forward in what was a completely lawful battle of wits between sisu and acl at the time regards Rent - then i believe you will find the council facing some astronomical amounts of costs and fines etc..

I hope I'm proven wrong as both sides are completely ruining the club, however I also have wish that we see out at least 1 year at sixfields, i have to admit, i love it there, the atmosphere may not be of the old days at Highfield Road but then at least it is not as horribly downbeat and tense as the Ricoh. The team seem to be shining due tot he lack of pressure on them at Sixfields, and the closeness to the pitch, the management and players is a real added bonus. If it aint broke dont fix it, thats the number one rule in life.

I also like the Mr Fisher and the rest of the Coventry City so called bigwigs sit with us, and they are approachable, I have found Mr Fisher and his wife to be lovely people who are human, some of the rubbish thrown at them is out of order. If you dont want to go to Sixfields that is your choice, but on the field Otium, Sisu, whatever you want to call them are getting it right. I support Otium, the team, the Club! When will other people see what this city Council is doing to our club? wake up - open your eyes

ointlaugh: Twat

Edit:- Either Tim is losing it and resorting to this shit "Tim and his wife,lovely people" OR someone needs help. Seriously this person has lost it. I will not go even though I have got free season tickets, that haven't been used this season, company car, free fuel etc.

As far as I'm concerned , and of course in the interests of political correctness , everyone is entitled to go if they want, whoever goes to sixfields is contributing to the downfall of CCFC.

IMO if Sisu do not get the RICOH then plan fuckin Z is merge NTFC with CCFC after NTFC has gone down to conference. Hey fuckin ho team in league one , fan base installed, Cardoza sold up etc. SISU are Northamptons saviours and CCFC has gone.

Ps :-If we were Millwall,Leeds, etc Sixfields would not be standing anymore , Know what I'm saying :jerkit:

savosdad · Nov 2, 2013

you ass wipe

sorry but its a PR game again! no chance of ricoh return (3 Viewers)

Active Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

New Member

Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

CCFC Finance Director

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Banned

Users who are viewing this thread