EasternGreenSkyBlue
New Member
But if we keep everyone surely you all have to give SISU some credit for not selling?
But if we keep everyone surely you all have to give SISU some credit for not selling?
But if we keep everyone surely you all have to give SISU some credit for not selling?
Or landing us with players that no one else wants?
But if we keep everyone surely you all have to give SISU some credit for not selling?
well run clubs that back the manager, will sell at a good price, and will have replacements lined up. sisu just rely on freebies and the kids.Urgh, not this again. Every club is a "selling club", even your Man Utds and your Arsenals to a degree. All clubs at our level will find themselves to be "selling clubs".
Players come and go. Good players get interest from better clubs and they end up going to them. Such is [football] life.
Urgh, not this again. Every club is a "selling club", even your Man Utds and your Arsenals to a degree. All clubs at our level will find themselves to be "selling clubs".
Players come and go. Good players get interest from better clubs and they end up going to them. Such is [football] life.
Feel free to point out where I actually said I am happy with this or continue to make up statements I haven't made.But for a couple of years now our best players leave and we have to rely on youth players coming through to save us from relegation. Yet you seem to be happy with this.
well run clubs that back the manager, will sell at a good price, and will have replacements lined up. sisu just rely on freebies and the kids.
Feel free to point out where I actually said I am happy with this or continue to make up statements I haven't made.
But for a couple of years now our best players leave and we have to rely on youth players coming through to save us from relegation. Yet you seem to be happy with this.
Oh so who have sold for peanuts while Stephen Pressley has been at the helm then?
I really don't want to stick up for SISU but sometimes you get forced into it. Compare our transfer activity these last two years with all the other clubs in our league, its our level, we have to deal with it unfortunately.well run clubs that back the manager, will sell at a good price, and will have replacements lined up. sisu just rely on freebies and the kids.
Why should we go out and spend money on players when we have young, talented and local lads who will play for the badge?
This is his first transfer window since clubs have seen our players and they have been fit. Come back at 11pm and tell us you told us so.
Whats that got to do with the current debate at hand? Just admit you have basically made up something I haven't said to suit your agenda.Feel free to show any posts you have made showing you are unhappy with the way SISU have ruined our club.
I really don't want to stick up for SISU but sometimes you get forced into it. Compare our transfer activity these last two years with all the other clubs in our league, its our level, we have to deal with it unfortunately.
The biggest mistake SISU made was not strengthening the side during the relegation season and they obviously paid for it with, yep you guessed it, relegation. Before that, they had made an outlay on players but even I'd be sceptical of paying money for players when you spunk £1.2m on Freddy Eastwood (cheers Coleman).
You need to remember, this isn't like football manager where you can simply go out and spend £1m on a new player every transfer window.
Its a balancing act living within our means and unfortunately that sometimes means selling players, just like 90% of clubs. Or you could argue 99% of clubs at our level below.
I don't like it but I do understand that the best way to make money in football is via making a profit on transfers. We've shafted ourselves in the back a few times by not tying up contracts and also shafted ourselves by tying shite players to long term, overpaid contracts. Its a fine balancing game which is hardly ever satisfactory unless you have a Sheik Mansour.
The new FFP rules will certainly make the next few years interesting.
Ignoring the stadium debacle, the only way Coventry City can run with its fan base and current stature in the football pyramid is by making a profit from the buying (or bringing through youth players) and selling of them at a profit.
That worked 2 years ago when we were in the Championship.......didn't it.......![]()
Whats that got to do with the current debate at hand? Just admit you have basically made up something I haven't said to suit your agenda.
I am unhappy with the way SISU have run us.
Feel free to be an interent weirdo and go through my post history if you wish and you'll see when I'm not taking the piss out of the "acronym bleating, anti-SISU regardless of whats going on, Tell me I'm a great fan even though I don't know why I'm doing what I'm doing" brigade I am far from happy with the current state of our football club.
If thats not the case, please let me know what else I am thinking. Cheers.
Answered your previous post whilst you done this one
Never had to look at any of your previous posts. I think you can see if I have looked at your profile. You always seem to jump on anyones back having a go at SISU. Most of us know the story of SISU and CCFC. It started off well but has gone downhill rapidly. Are we supposed to stay on their side until it is all over?
I now do not trust them. If we don't sell anyone today I will be a bit happier with them. If they are serious about getting us back in Coventry they should show us. New ground, talks on getting back to the Ricoh or anything else. Just give us a reason to believe them again. Until then I won't trust them at all.
I only jump on those who just scream out "NOPM" or turn a thread discussing the best striker we had in the 90's into another "SHITSU" thread or those who are actively looking for a pat on the back on the back for being a great fan because they aren't going to Northampton (like they told us in their last post, and the post before that).
I'm kind of like a shit, sarky, SBT forum police officer, if you will?
Wade through the dross on this site on this site and there's some excellent postings and well thought out reasons on both sides of the fence and even for those who like to get splinters in their arse.
I just like to see and judge every action on its own merits and not just presume that because a L1 Club may have to sell its best players its solely down to whoever isn't flavour of the month/season/decade.
I did have an irrational dislike of David Bell and Gary Deegan's inabilities as a footballers, for which I make no apology.
But if we keep everyone surely you all have to give SISU some credit for not selling?
So you're saying that whatever happens today, we have to turn into a negative against SISU?
That makes perfect sense.