Football League meets tomorrow (Wednesday 5 th) (7 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Voice_of_Reason

Voice_of_Reason

Well-Known Member
I know loads of us have emailed the Football League expressing our concerns and got the "standard reply" about the Golden Share being with CCFC Ltd when it went into Administration. What's the betting any decision will be postponed until they get Paul Appleton's report ? In any event, lets all hope our emails struck home ! SISU out !
 
K

KersleyDigs

Well-Known Member
They emailed me this reply today:

Dan,

Thank you for your email.

It is not possible for The Football League to pre-judge the outcome of any administration process. All matters will be considered by the Board in due course.

The League is not commenting on any further matter at this time.

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
KersleyDigs said:
They emailed me this reply today:

Dan,

Thank you for your email.

It is not possible for The Football League to pre-judge the outcome of any administration process. All matters will be considered by the Board in due course.

The League is not commenting on any further matter at this time.

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,
Click to expand...
Not expecting any good news then. These people have absolutely no balls.
 
ccfc92

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I'd be very surprised if we have any outcome before Christmas. Portsmouth took ages, over a year, and that was a "simple" takeover, their only problem was a price of their stadium.
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
ccfc92 said:
I'd be very surprised if we have any outcome before Christmas. Portsmouth took ages, over a year, and that was a "simple" takeover, their only problem was a price of their stadium.
Click to expand...

I agree. Not sure what people were expecting.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
There will not be any big progress tomorrow.

So dig in folks, prepare for the long winter.

No Joy With Joy Not A Penny More!!
 
bigfatronssba

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
What exactly is this meeting for?
 
Q

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
ccfc92 said:
I'd be very surprised if we have any outcome before Christmas. Portsmouth took ages, over a year, and that was a "simple" takeover, their only problem was a price of their stadium.
Click to expand...

I think you may be in for a surprise . I've said from the start sisu are looking for a way out They'll have plenty of options after friday.i can see a sisu/new buyer partnership . It's not the outcome we want but its a start.
 
ccfc92

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
quinn1971 said:
I think you may be in for a surprise . I've said from the start sisu are looking for a way out They'll have plenty of options after friday.i can see a sisu/new buyer partnership . It's not the outcome we want but its a start.
Click to expand...

I hope im in for a suprise pal! Was just saying I can't see it being over soon. But I hope it's a good/positive suprise!
 
S

simple_simon

New Member
Partnership with Mr Bying and his China contacts, I understand he is also involved with SISU so you maybe right about joint venture,
 
Q

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
simple_simon said:
Partnership with Mr Bying and his China contacts, I understand he is also involved with SISU so you maybe right about joint venture,
Click to expand...

Short term deal with sisu to keep us at the ricoh.? I was a bit worried after reading the points of the meeting with fisher last night but after reading it again there's too many contradictions.too many ifs.anyway why would they have spoke to Hoffman before about selling? they're in an even worse position now than they were then.
 
Flying Fokker

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
KersleyDigs said:
They emailed me this reply today:

Dan,

Thank you for your email.

It is not possible for The Football League to pre-judge the outcome of any administration process. All matters will be considered by the Board in due course.

The League is not commenting on any further matter at this time.

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,
Click to expand...

That's actually a reasonable response. As said before, this kind of contact will help the FL focus the mind and hopefully there will be some feedback regarding the amount of emails they have received.
 
Q

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
quinn1971 said:
Short term deal with sisu to keep us at the ricoh.? I was a bit worried after reading the points of the meeting with fisher last night but after reading it again there's too many contradictions.too many ifs.anyway why would they have spoke to Hoffman before about selling? they're in an even worse position now than they were then.
Click to expand...

Also the real reason why the bidding process was extended was maybe to give sisu more time to work out their exit strategy.sometimes we forget the facts.fisher is not running the club anymore the administrator is.he says if the club is up for sale which it will be.
 
S

SkyBlueBlood

Member
ccfc92 said:
I'd be very surprised if we have any outcome before Christmas. Portsmouth took ages, over a year, and that was a "simple" takeover, their only problem was a price of their stadium.
Click to expand...

I think Portsmouth was a bit more than that. Didn't the administrator have to go to court to force a sale at a fair price from the previous owner.

Hopefully that is exactly what will happen here if Appleton's got the balls to put Joy and Timmy in court for a forced sale!
 
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
if, any of this is factual,
then a rational human being could only despair at the lengths the owners will go,
i wonder whether their anonymous investors would react positively to their antics,
further,
if factual,
then the full weight of the law should fall upon those responsible,
& not THE FANS
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The only way this will move quickly is if someone offers SISU an amount they are happy to accept to walk away. You still then have the issue of the incoming owner agreeing terms with ACL or making a deal with the council to buy the stadium, although those could be put on the back burner and a 1 season agreement used.
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
SkyBlueBlood said:
I think Portsmouth was a bit more than that. Didn't the administrator have to go to court to force a sale at a fair price from the previous owner.

Hopefully that is exactly what will happen here if Appleton's got the balls to put Joy and Timmy in court for a forced sale!
Click to expand...

With Portsmouth the former owner was actually someone who had loaded the club, under a previous owner, money and had ended up taking ownership when there was a default on the loan. The big issue was that there was a charge over the ground (similar to the Arvo charge I guess) and the administrator had to get court approval to sell at a price that would be lower than that charge.
 
CJ_covblaze

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
2pm start. "It's going to be a long one!"
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
It won't be today .Would be useful for some defining comment before the Forums start .At least then questions can be more informed .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Top