LarryGrayson
Member
well all condem them justly
if they win i assume well all condem the counsel for behavin illegaly right
if they win i assume well all condem the counsel for behavin illegaly right
well all condem them justly
if they win i assume well all condem the counsel for behavin illegaly right
well all condem them justly
if they win i assume well all condem the counsel for behavin illegaly right
Why have you started a new thread when you could have used a perfectly good on already
so which outcome are you hoping for?
cos i didnt want everone agreein theyd condem an illegal act to be lost in the accusations of sisu rent boy
im hoppin for the one thats legally right mate wichever one that is an i dunno which it is as i ant a lawyer an i dont have all the facts
once its done ill say whichever side loses is totally in the wrong for that bit will you
im hoppin for the one thats legally right mate wichever one that is an i dunno which it is as i ant a lawyer an i dont have all the facts
once its done ill say whichever side loses is totally in the wrong for that bit will you
Thats the problem the council has used public money to bail out a private firm thats where the problem lies i think thats the only ground for this action.plus sisu hang around some more.wrong, the only reason the council had to step in was because sisu were trying to bankrupt acl, protecting a company that was doing nothing wrong against an attack like this is morally correct whatever the court rules.
Thats the problem the council has used public money to bail out a private firm thats where the problem lies i think thats the only ground for this action.plus sisu hang around some more.
two wrongs dont make a right