Does thid mean we ciuld still be liqidated? (1 Viewer)

[rob9872]

If as some of you suggest sisu intend to liquidate is and none if the assets are included in the admin company, presumably we van still be liquidated which was what acl told us was their intention to avoid by placing us in admin.

 

---

[Covstu]

Well if this is another 'wing' of the company then in theory there is nothing stopping them putting the football side in to liquidation I guess. I really fear the worse but I think this was a way to clear that 1.3m debt by putting the rent side into admin so therefore starting over with a clear debt. Not sure ACL will be happy about it!

 

[bradwellskyblues]

acl get what they deserve

 

[the rumpo kid]

do you always write with a lisp ?

 

[rob9872]

No but when I'm on phone or tablet I have fat fingers and if you notice, most of my errors are one key away on qwerty keyboard.

 

[wingy]

If as some of you suggest sisu intend to liquidate is and none if the assets are included in the admin company, presumably we van still be liquidated which was what acl told us was their intention to avoid by placing us in admin.

The company in Admins only asset is the charge it holds over Ryton ,someone taking their million out??

 

[CJparker]

acl get what they deserve

As far as I see it, the OP is right. SISU could chose to liquidate the club still (though they will not do so).