Match Thread Coventry City - Millwall FC Match Thread - Tuesday 20th Jan (71 Viewers)

blunted

Well-Known Member
To be honest, yesterday’s win over an inform Watford side was unexpected. I expected a defeat but everything clicked yesterday. We pressed high and in the 1st half we made them look pretty ordinary. 2nd half they played better but Azeez and Coburn took their goals well and we ran out deserved winners.

I didn’t yesterday, even after our result, expect to beat you lot on Tuesday, and that won’t change. With a lot of our injured players back now I do expect us to compete better than when we played you at the Den. Our win against Watford makes our game against you a free hit, because I expected to lose to both teams.

Of course I’d be happy with a draw, even ecstatic if we got the win, but given the choice of losing against you but beating Charlton on Saturday and keeping our 29 year win run over them intact (and send them nearer the trap door in the process), I’d take a defeat from Coventry every day.
The Watford manager accepted you were much better than them. Considering we were three nil up against them at half time, could have scored a few more, and packed up in the second half, he still claimed they were the better team against us. Looking at his previous assessments, I guess you must have been really good.
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
First of all, I don’t hate Charlton, not in the same way Coventry fans hate the Villa. I see Charlton more as an irrelevance really - a team and fan base we like to laugh at, mainly due to their delusions of grandeur in believing that their rightful place should be in the Premier League, and not slumming it down in the dreadful Championship! 🤣

Stoke City fans feel the same way. Go on both the Charlton and Stoke football forums and just read the level of entitlement that makes them think they‘re so superior to all the rest of us. It’s pathetic really, but also very, very funny. That’s why I can’t take either of those clubs seriously anymore.

I’m happy to address your sly racist inference dig because, unlike you, I know the real truth and not learnt a lot of the lies peddled about us by the tabloids and social media over the past five decades!

I‘ve been going to Millwall since 1974. I’m now 62, so I’ve seen it all. I don’t know how old you are, but back in the 70s and 80s football fans rivalry and hatred of other clubs was pretty much the norm and much more intense than it is these days. Every club back then had their fair share of hooligans and racists, even the likes of Leeds, Man Utd, Chelsea, etc.

What helped to tarnish my club was the 1977 Panorama documentary in which we were stitched up by the BBC in how they portrayed us! Even now, 50 years on, they haven’t changed - witness how the BBC recently edited two different Trump interviews together to make Trump look like a liar. They’ve been doing this sort of thing for decades and getting away with it!

Now, I’m not denying we never used to have an element of racist fans at our club, but if you were to look back at our fan base and our club (starting from the late 60’s when we signed our first black player, striker Frank Peterson in 1968) you will see that Millwall fans have always welcomed black players at our club.

Phil Walker and Trevor Lee both signed for us in 1975. They were the first Black players to truly establish themselves and become fan favourites, with Walker winning Player of the Year in 1978. Peterson may have broke the initial barrier, but Walker and Lee were the pioneers who integrated and excelled in the late 1970s, a period when such players were rare in the upper tiers of English football.

Since then we’ve had numerous black players playing for us, many of whom have won the fans player of the season award. Ah, I hear you say, but what about your treatment of other club’s black players? Yes, that did happen in the past, but it also happened with Leeds, Man Utd, Chelsea fans, etc. as well. Those clubs don’t have that stigma against them now, because they’re big boys in the Premier League, so all that nasty history gets forgotten and brushed under the carpet so as to avoid having the Premiership name tarnished by their past misdemeanours.

Unfortunately we still do have a minority of fans who like to dish out racist slurs towards opposition players, and whilst you cannot condone that behaviour, it has been heard less and less over the years down at the Den. We’ve had CCTV and microphones installed in all four stands for a number of years now, and the perpetrators of these crimes are instantly caught and banned for life.

My club has been trying to clean up its tarnished reputation for years now, yet for all that we do in our local community (which the club has won many awards for) it only takes one journalist with an agenda against us to put a spin on something, and all of the good work and things we have put into place, just gets forgotten and the racism tag rears it’s ugly head again. It’s typical lazy journalism and much of it nowadays is totally unwarranted.
My asian mate got terrible racist abuse at Millwall from several fans, one who was an OAP woman. Glad you are cleaning up, as that was at the Den.
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
I was massively on the wind up. I obviously realise the vast majority of Millwall fans are likely not racists and I meant no offence. I know you don’t care if I like you or not, but you seem like a nice poster.

Charlton fans on the other hand, bloody hell.
Millwall fans do like their flat caps though.
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
Up thread I "liked" going with the same starting team as Saturday . But might be tempted to start with Yang rather than EMC

He should at least get 30 minutes either way
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Couple of things…

Chanting at fans of other clubs has been going on since football first started having home and away fans in the same stadium. Things get tribal and the north-south divide attitude doesn’t help matters.

How many YouTube football chanting compilation videos show what Man Utd fans sing about their rivals, City, or the number of clubs that pick on the Scousers (though mainly Liverpool?) Is it still wrong for Leeds fans to hold their arms out and make aircraft engine noises to the Man Utd fans for what happened nearly 70 years ago at Munich? Of course it is. Its not nice, it’s not funny but it is macabre sense of humour that seems to be exclusive to football fans, but mostly fans from the UK.

Yes, we did boo teams when they took the knee at the Den. For two reasons.

1) All of the knee taking started in the US and collectively Millwall fans wanted no politics to enter football. That doesn’t make us racist. What it says is that politics and sport should never get into bed with one another and fans should not be used as puppets so their clubs can be seen to do “the right thing.”

2) We were eventually proved right about the BLM when investigations into their organisation revealed significant financial mismanagement, including leaders using donor funds for luxury homes and personal expenses, leading to a lack of transparency and accusations of misusing millions of dollars meant for racial justice.

If that doesn’t scream “con” to you, then I don’t know what to say. How is stealing millions of dollars meant for racial justice (to help ethnic minorities) actually helping them?

Also, there were a few (admittedly very few) UK black football players who refused to take the knee, citing as Millwall fans did, that politics had no place in football and one black footballer said that he felt that black players were “being used as puppets.”

Read the following link to get the full story.


And yes, you‘re right: some Millwall fans (a minority) do not help themselves, but the same can also be said about the small number of racist football fans from many other Prem and EFL clubs, who don’t help themselves either!
So chanting "I'd rather be a P*ki than a scouse" is just tribal? Fuck off mate

You weren't proved right were you as you decided to try and stop anyone who wanted to do it. Also plenty of other black footballers disagreed with him.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The Watford manager accepted you were much better than them. Considering we were three nil up against them at half time, could have scored a few more, and packed up in the second half, he still claimed they were the better team against us. Looking at his previous assessments, I guess you must have been really good.
Watford really impressed me in midfield and going forward, but looked disorganised at the back. It doesn’t surprise me that a team who tamed that midfield then got a result.

We really can’t afford to give them as much space in the middle as we have yesterday.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
So chanting "I'd rather be a P*ki than a scouse" is just tribal? Fuck off mate

You weren't proved right were you as you decided to try and stop anyone who wanted to do it. Also plenty of other black footballers disagreed with him.
Wasn't there a team that used the excuse they 'didn't want politics in football' for booing players taking the knee, but at the same time were chanting about something else political, like Brexit? Not sure it was Millwall, but just reminded me of it as it had been brought up again.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Wasn't there a team that used the excuse they 'didn't want politics in football' for booing players taking the knee, but at the same time were chanting about something else political, like Brexit? Not sure it was Millwall, but just reminded me of it as it had been brought up again.
Millwall definitely booed players taking the knee.

They could have done what normal people did and ignore they 30 seconds of people on their knees.

Still it did have a good moment, just after the whole booing a black scored their and celebrated by taking the knee in front of them.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Millwall definitely booed players taking the knee.

They could have done what normal people did and ignore they 30 seconds of people on their knees.

Still it did have a good moment, just after the whole booing a black scored their and celebrated by taking the knee in front of them.
I know they booed taking the knee. Just can't remember if it was them chanting about Brexit, or whatever the other political thing was.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
My asian mate got terrible racist abuse at Millwall from several fans, one who was an OAP woman. Glad you are cleaning up, as that was at the Den.
I’m sorry to hear that about your mate. I hope he reported it to the officials in the stands?

Unfortunately we do still have a small number of much older fans (like that OAP woman) who can’t let go of the past and still cling to their racial prejudices. I’m sure had that woman been sat in the block where I sit, strong words would have been said to her by many others around her.
 

curly_tom

Well-Known Member
I’m sorry to hear that about your mate. I hope he reported it to the officials in the stands?

Unfortunately we do still have a small number of much older fans (like that OAP woman) who can’t let go of the past and still cling to their racial prejudices. I’m sure had that woman been sat in the block where I sit, strong words would have been said to her by many others around her.
I agree with a lot of what you say. I have a good mate who supports your lot and also says racism is on the decline.

Backing up the booing of people making a peaceful protest against racism does not help your argument. Anyone booing taking the knee is being racist. The ´no politics in football’ argument is stupid. There’s always politics in sport and everywhere where there are people. And particularly it needs to be there in a sport with a long history of racism. Adding that some organisers stole some money does not prove you were right. It’s irrelevant.

Claiming Trump was set up to look like he lied is equally stupid. The guy lies with almost every word he says and is famously hugely racist.

I’ve been to Millwall a lot and sat in both ends and it’s mostly fine but there is a love of intimidation happening as well.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I agree with a lot of what you say. I have a good mate who supports your lot and also says racism is on the decline.

Backing up the booing of people making a peaceful protest against racism does not help your argument. Anyone booing taking the knee is being racist. The ´no politics in football’ argument is stupid. There’s always politics in sport and everywhere where there are people. And particularly it needs to be there in a sport with a long history of racism. Adding that some organisers stole some money does not prove you were right. It’s irrelevant.

Claiming Trump was set up to look like he lied is equally stupid. The guy lies with almost every word he says and is famously hugely racist.

I’ve been to Millwall a lot and sat in both ends and it’s mostly fine but there is a love of intimidation happening as well.
Exactly, it was a minute or some before the start of a game. They could just ignore it.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
So chanting "I'd rather be a P*ki than a scouse" is just tribal? Fuck off mate

You weren't proved right were you as you decided to try and stop anyone who wanted to do it. Also plenty of other black footballers disagreed with him.
The word “Tribal” means

”relating to or characteristic of a tribe, a social group with shared ancestry, culture, and often language, but it also describes strong in-group loyalty, like among sports fans or political parties. It signified strong unity within a group, sometimes with suspicion towards outsiders, encompassing cultural traditions, leadership, and a deep sense of belonging.”

So I’d say that all of the above can be categorised amongst any racist football fans, particularly when they are in a group, who don’t like or hate a certain race because of their colour or their religious beliefs.

When did any Millwall fans try to stop anyone who wanted to take the knee? Booing opposing players didn’t stop those that wanted to do it, even if some of our fans hoped that would happen. Footballers have individual thinking. Either they decided to take the knee or they didn’t. So I don’t understand your argument here. Please elaborate.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The word “Tribal” means

”relating to or characteristic of a tribe, a social group with shared ancestry, culture, and often language, but it also describes strong in-group loyalty, like among sports fans or political parties. It signified strong unity within a group, sometimes with suspicion towards outsiders, encompassing cultural traditions, leadership, and a deep sense of belonging.”

So I’d say that all of the above can be categorised amongst any racist football fans, particularly when they are in a group, who don’t like or hate a certain race because of their colour or their religious beliefs.

When did any Millwall fans try to stop anyone who wanted to take the knee? Booing opposing players didn’t stop those that wanted to do it, even if some of our fans hoped that would happen. Footballers have individual thinking. Either they decided to take the knee or they didn’t. So I don’t understand your argument here. Please elaborate.
so you are also justifying "I'd rather be a P*** than a scouse",, ok

You miss the point with the booing, someone expalined it better above.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
Millwall definitely booed players taking the knee.

They could have done what normal people did and ignore they 30 seconds of people on their knees.

Still it did have a good moment, just after the whole booing a black scored their and celebrated by taking the knee in front of them.
And that’s precisely the point of my argument. The black player celebrating his goal by taking the knee could have inflamed the situation and caused trouble. Another reason why sport and politics should be kept separate - there are too many people who get wound up by sport and politics separately - put them together and it can become a powder keg waiting to explode.

Thankfully our fans had the sense to just boo him again.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
And that’s precisely the point of my argument. The black player celebrating his goal by taking the knee could have inflamed the situation and caused trouble. Another reason why sport and politics should be kept separate - there are too many people who get wound up by sport and politics separately - put them together and it can become a powder keg waiting to explode.

Thankfully our fans had the sense to just boo him again.
You made it political by booing it, sport is fucking political, life is political

Mate, you are basically spinning in circles trying to defend racism and for that you can fuck right off, we are done.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
The word “Tribal” means

”relating to or characteristic of a tribe, a social group with shared ancestry, culture, and often language, but it also describes strong in-group loyalty, like among sports fans or political parties. It signified strong unity within a group, sometimes with suspicion towards outsiders, encompassing cultural traditions, leadership, and a deep sense of belonging.”

So I’d say that all of the above can be categorised amongst any racist football fans, particularly when they are in a group, who don’t like or hate a certain race because of their colour or their religious beliefs.

When did any Millwall fans try to stop anyone who wanted to take the knee? Booing opposing players didn’t stop those that wanted to do it, even if some of our fans hoped that would happen. Footballers have individual thinking. Either they decided to take the knee or they didn’t. So I don’t understand your argument here. Please elaborate.
But can you see how booing taking the knee, for whatever reason, just enables and emboldens the actual racists?

If you didn't support it for political reasons, do a silent protest. It then lets you identify the racists, as they'll be the ones booing, rather than letting them hide in a crowd.

Plus many people would believe that the reason of politics was a smokescreen and that the actual reason was race. Including the racists, who would feel like a lot more people actually agree with them and thus give them more confidence to air/act on their views.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
so you are also justifying "I'd rather be a P*** than a scouse",, ok

You miss the point with the booing, someone expalined it better above.
I’m not justifying anything.

I’ll put it a different way. Words can sometimes hurt people. They shouldn’t but some people are more thin skinned than others and tend to react.

So if you wanted to wind up a racist Scouser, wouldn’t that slur upset him more? The chant “I’d rather be a Londoner than a Scouse” just wouldn’t work on these racists. The words are designed to hurt people. Surely if you were a Scouser and not a racist, then the chant wouldn’t hurt you in the slightest?

Re the booing. I was just trying to understand where you said, “you decided to try and stop anyone who wanted to do it.”

I assumed you meant we the fans decided to physically stop anyone who agreed with taking the knee?

I can assure you the booing was to let those who took the knee know that it was a political gesture. Not anything else. You obviously didn’t read the article in the link I posted which, if you read all of it (and not just the beginning few paragraphs) it will express my points no doubt much more succinctly than what I’ve tried to convey here.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I’m not justifying anything.

I’ll put it a different way. Words can sometimes hurt people. They shouldn’t but some people are more thin skinned than others and tend to react.

So if you wanted to wind up a racist Scouser, wouldn’t that slur upset him more? The chant “I’d rather be a Londoner than a Scouse” just wouldn’t work on these racists. The words are designed to hurt people. Surely if you were a Scouser and not a racist, then the chant wouldn’t hurt you in the slightest?

Re the booing. I was just trying to understand where you said, “you decided to try and stop anyone who wanted to do it.”

I assumed you meant we the fans decided to physically stop anyone who agreed with taking the knee?

I can assure you the booing was to let those who took the knee know that it was a political gesture. Not anything else. You obviously didn’t read the article in the link I posted which, if you read all of it (and not just the beginning few paragraphs) it will express my points no doubt much more succinctly than what I’ve tried to convey here.
I know this is still interrupting the match thread, so apologies,

But it seems you're trying to make a justification that you could use a term like p*ki acceptably because it would upset a racist? That's one hell of a take. For someone coming on here trying to argue they, and Millwall fans in general, aren't racist you're doing a very bad job. Because if that kind of thinking is considered normal and acceptable enough around your area then I've got big news for you...

You don't use a racist word that that group of people find offensive. You're just going to offend them. While the racists are just thinking "hey, it's ok to use that term'
 
Last edited:

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
I agree with a lot of what you say. I have a good mate who supports your lot and also says racism is on the decline.

Backing up the booing of people making a peaceful protest against racism does not help your argument. Anyone booing taking the knee is being racist. The ´no politics in football’ argument is stupid. There’s always politics in sport and everywhere where there are people. And particularly it needs to be there in a sport with a long history of racism. Adding that some organisers stole some money does not prove you were right. It’s irrelevant.

Claiming Trump was set up to look like he lied is equally stupid. The guy lies with almost every word he says and is famously hugely racist.

I’ve been to Millwall a lot and sat in both ends and it’s mostly fine but there is a love of intimidation happening as well.
What did the actual taking of the knee achieve in the end, because it did eventually stop? If it mattered so much to so many people (and players) why is it still not in use in football today? In the link I posted, even John Barnes said at the time that the gesture was pointless. Racism still continues around the world, so all it did was highlight the death of a black man in the US and then went worldwide.

Why did it take this one killing of George Floyd to stir up this anger, when thousands of ethnic minorities have been indiscriminately killed by racist police in the US, ever since it was legal (or illegal) to have a gun? Why didn’t Americans rise up beforehand and defend those dead minorities every time someone was unlawfully killed because of the colour of their skin?

I’m not trying to prove I’m right by saying what I said about the misdemeanours of the BLM party. It’s all there, and has been well documented. If you choose not to believe it, that is your right, but it seems to me that stealing money for personal gain and not giving it to the people you represent, is wrong. And yes, there has always been politics in sport, but it’s usually been at board level of institutions like FIFA, the EUFA or the IOC - not out in front on a football pitch or athletic arena.

I used the analogy of what the BBC (a supposedly impartial organisation) did to Trump in relation to what they did to us in the Panorama documentary - changing stuff to make someone look bad. It’s irrelevant whether you like/dislike Trump and what he stands for, it’s the principle of altering the facts to suit someone else’s (the BBC) editorial needs which is wrong.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
I know this is still interrupting the match thread, so apologies,

But it seems you're trying to make a justification that you could use a term like p*ki acceptably because it would upset a racist? That's one hell of a take. For someone coming on here trying to argue they, and Millwall fans in general, aren't racist you're doing a very bad job. Because if that kind of thinking is considered normal and acceptable enough around your area then I've got big news for you...

You don't use a racist word that that group of people find offensive. You're just going to offend them. While the racists are just thinking "hey, it's ok to use that term'
I have black. white and Indian mates who I went to school with, over 50 years ago, and we all attend home games at the Den. I know for a fact that it would anger the black lads I’m with if they were singled out as being called a black bas*ard instead of just a Millwall bas*ard, because in their eyes they are just a fan of the club they support. To them it’s not about race, creed or colour so why should someone who doesn’t know you, get to label you with something that has no relevance to being a fan?

To the racist, using the word ‘black’ before bas*ard is highlighting that they are different from others around them. Like P*ki, it’s a derogatory term used to hurt and anger opposing fans of a particular race. That’s why they do it.
 

MillwallFan

Well-Known Member
You made it political by booing it, sport is fucking political, life is political

Mate, you are basically spinning in circles trying to defend racism and for that you can fuck right off, we are done.
Well, I’m sorry you feel that way about me, as I am in no way defending racism (as you think I am) so I will leave this topic at that and let you all get back to the match thread.

Mods, sorry if I’ve derailed this thread but I wanted to correct what I believe were a few inaccuracies about my club and to say that not everyone who supports us is a racist (even if Mr. O’Day thinks I am).

Peace.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

SBT

Well-Known Member
What helped to tarnish my club was the 1977 Panorama documentary in which we were stitched up by the BBC in how they portrayed us! Even now, 50 years on, they haven’t changed - witness how the BBC recently edited two different Trump interviews together to make Trump look like a liar. They’ve been doing this sort of thing for decades and getting away with it!

Now, I’m not denying we never used to have an element of racist fans at our club, but if you were to look back at our fan base and our club (starting from the late 60’s when we signed our first black player, striker Frank Peterson in 1968) you will see that Millwall fans have always welcomed black players at our club
Trying to pin decades of violence and racism from within your fanbase on a BBC documentary from 50 years ago is world class deflection. Good to know that “some of our best players are black” though!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I have black. white and Indian mates who I went to school with, over 50 years ago, and we all attend home games at the Den. I know for a fact that it would anger the black lads I’m with if they were singled out as being called a black bas*ard instead of just a Millwall bas*ard, because in their eyes they are just a fan of the club they support. To them it’s not about race, creed or colour so why should someone who doesn’t know you, get to label you with something that has no relevance to being a fan?

To the racist, using the word ‘black’ before bas*ard is highlighting that they are different from others around them. Like P*ki, it’s a derogatory term used to hurt and anger opposing fans of a particular race. That’s why they do it.
Literally using the ‘I have black friends’ defence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top