SkyBlueGuy
Well-Known Member
Question: Does the Championship (or Second Division, as it was) actually get better each year? Are the players, tactics, and overall standard genuinely improving season after season?
I ask because I've been reading a few threads about signings lately, and there seem to be two schools of thought. One is that we had a top-six side last year, kept the group together, and added players in key positions—so we should be about the same or better. The other view is that standing still means falling behind—that unless you strengthen, you'll slip backwards because the league keeps improving.
I'm not sure how you'd objectively measure improvement across the league. It's certainly changing—the game today is very different from the 80s or 90s with new rules, better fitness, sports science, data analysis, and so on. There's evolution, no doubt. But is it improvement in the purest sense?
I'm not trying to start an argument—genuinely curious what others think. Is the bar being raised every year?
I ask because I've been reading a few threads about signings lately, and there seem to be two schools of thought. One is that we had a top-six side last year, kept the group together, and added players in key positions—so we should be about the same or better. The other view is that standing still means falling behind—that unless you strengthen, you'll slip backwards because the league keeps improving.
I'm not sure how you'd objectively measure improvement across the league. It's certainly changing—the game today is very different from the 80s or 90s with new rules, better fitness, sports science, data analysis, and so on. There's evolution, no doubt. But is it improvement in the purest sense?
I'm not trying to start an argument—genuinely curious what others think. Is the bar being raised every year?