Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (33 Viewers)

Forums New posts
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
On the final home match of the league season Overson and Marsh were arranging to meet at the pub that evening. Those of you who believe both parties are part of the leeks will no doubt see their obvious friendly relationship as evidence of this.

In the interests of balance ithe fact they are on friendly terms doesn’t prove they are the leeks.

Why would the recruitment group talk to the kit man about their transfer plans ?? Unless of course the kit man and Adi or Mark were social friends too .
 
Ccfcisparks

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
On the final home match of the league season Overson and Marsh were arranging to meet at the pub that evening. Those of you who believe both parties are part of the leeks will no doubt see their obvious friendly relationship as evidence of this.

In the interests of balance ithe fact they are on friendly terms doesn’t prove they are the leeks.

Why would the recruitment group talk to the kit man about their transfer plans ?? Unless of course the kit man and Adi or Mark were social friends too .
Click to expand...
DIdnt Adi and Marsh play at Walsall together?
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
On the final home match of the league season Overson and Marsh were arranging to meet at the pub that evening. Those of you who believe both parties are part of the leeks will no doubt see their obvious friendly relationship as evidence of this.

In the interests of balance ithe fact they are on friendly terms doesn’t prove they are the leeks.

Why would the recruitment group talk to the kit man about their transfer plans ?? Unless of course the kit man and Adi or Mark were social friends too .
Click to expand...

People outside the club even if they have connections can't be held responsible for leaks.
However someone employed by the club can, because most clubs put a confidentiality clause in people's contracts.

If someone has been sacked because of leaks it will not have been done without evidence. People employed by the club sharing information with each other is not a leak. It's when one of them releases it outside the club and into the public domain.

I stress "If" someone has been sacked.
 
Last edited:
Winny the Bish

Winny the Bish

Well-Known Member
Yorkshire SB said:
They are giving it a good go but they’re going to be heavily impacted by AFCON, assuming their players are called up - can miss between 4-6 PL games I believe.

One thing I’d noticed with all the promoted clubs is that they’re adding physicality and speed to their sides. Leeds have signed a bunch of giants so far.

I think it’s recognised that the jump in physicality is huge, believe Russell Martin said it took them by surprise and they struggled to complete.
Click to expand...
I remember a league 1 manager faced Man City in the FA Cup and said the biggest surprise was how quick they all were. Their fastest player couldn’t beat Man City’s slowest player in a foot race.

The step up in athleticism in the premier league is insane.
 
P

ptr

Well-Known Member
star wars GIF

Darth Doug sorting out Marshy and the Moles.
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
If someone has been sacked for leaking classified info then they deserve to be sacked. They need not worry though because their “friends” who they told confidentially (and then decided to broadcast it for their own ends )will no doubt pay their mortgage etc until they find another job. 🤔
 
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
If someone has been sacked for leaking classified info then they deserve to be sacked. They need not worry though because their “friends” who they told confidentially (and then decided to broadcast it for their own ends )will no doubt pay their mortgage etc until they find another job. 🤔
Click to expand...
Oh god give it a rest
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
If someone has been sacked for leaking classified info then they deserve to be sacked. They need not worry though because their “friends” who they told confidentially (and then decided to broadcast it for their own ends )will no doubt pay their mortgage etc until they find another job. 🤔
Click to expand...

Stupid if they told someone even 'confidentially'.
Keeping a secret isn't telling one person at a time. You don't get a pass on breaching confidentiality just because you only told your bestie.
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
Hobo said:
Stupid if they told someone even 'confidentially'.
Keeping a secret isn't telling one person at a time. You don't get a pass on breaching confidentiality just because you only told your bestie.
Click to expand...
I agree totally but in the real world people do share snippets of info to close friends that they think they will value. They possibly don’t expect that said friend to then post it on social platforms.
 
Sky Blue Goblin

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
I agree totally but in the real world people do share snippets of info to close friends that they think they will value. They possibly don’t expect that said friend to then post it on social platforms.
Click to expand...
To be fair, surely he would of known his information was being passed on for a while and could of told them to stop or stopped sharing?
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
I agree totally but in the real world people do share snippets of info to close friends that they think they will value. They possibly don’t expect that said friend to then post it on social platforms.
Click to expand...

Well they shouldn't if that information can cost them their job. Once you tell someone, you lose control of that information.

Anyway we are not talking about one leak are we, it was weekly and they were openly discussed on here.

I still go back to "If" someone has been sacked for leaks. As we had all sorts of nonsense on here around the departure of Adi Viveash
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 3 more.
    • Total: 29 (members: 9, guests: 20)
    Top