formation change (2 Viewers)

Pusb1

Well-Known Member
How do you think we go forward now?

i’d take a punt at the box again but in a 4-2-2-2

Have simms and wright up top with KP and COH in behind?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Seriously. This isn't a troll. But anyone saying 352 can't work is quite simply WRONG and I hope they admit it now

It's done wonders for us and continues to do so
 

Jarvo87

Well-Known Member
4411 without the ball, combined with a generally good press, 433 with it.
Broke with pace and looked a threat throughout.
A MR tactical masterclass today, I imagine everyone thought a back 3/wing backs and fairly deep set. But oh no!! Had GON scratching his head for the first 25 minutes.
 

2024/25 League 1 Champs?

Well-Known Member
How do you think we go forward now?

i’d take a punt at the box again but in a 4-2-2-2

Have simms and wright up top with KP and COH in behind?

I don’t want to repeat a cliche, but on past evidence CoH and KP struggle to play together - they kind of cancel each other out.

shame as they should be really effective..
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
352 can work, but it was definitely 4231 today

And MVE looked pretty decent at right wing tbf
It was mostly 4-2-3-1 but we slipped into 3-4-1-2 defensively - Robins deserves all the plaudits for the tactical flexibility.
 

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
Robins sold Wolves a dummy. Their bench was literally scrambling when they realised we were 4 atb.
When their keeper went down with a supposed thigh injury, O'Neill who had been frantically working on his ipad called his players over and issued instructions. The keeper made a miraculous recovery.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Today against Wolves it was fluid a sort of 4-3-3 when in possession going forward.

But without the ball it was more 4-4-2 or
even 4-4-1-1 at times

That is great progress to have that in game flexibility.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top