Doug King Takeover (9 Viewers)

Samo

Well-Known Member
The last snippet of info we've had was from the EFL basically saying the ball was in King and SISUs court. I suspect the ball is still there and long since stopped bouncing.

Is the implication here that SISU/King have not provided the required information to the EFL?
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
Certainly reads that way:

"Whilst we acknowledge your desire for information, it is EFL policy not to provide specific details regarding any applications under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test. A number of requirements must be met in the event of any potential application for a change of control. All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements, and matters remain ongoing.

We can only suggest you may wish to contact the Club for an update should you wish
."
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
Certainly reads that way:

"Whilst we acknowledge your desire for information, it is EFL policy not to provide specific details regarding any applications under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test. A number of requirements must be met in the event of any potential application for a change of control. All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements, and matters remain ongoing.

We can only suggest you may wish to contact the Club for an update should you wish
."
That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.

I just cant take anything other than "we're waiting for the club/purchaser to fulfil the requirements" from this sentence:

"All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements"
 

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
Certainly reads that way:

"Whilst we acknowledge your desire for information, it is EFL policy not to provide specific details regarding any applications under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test. A number of requirements must be met in the event of any potential application for a change of control. All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements, and matters remain ongoing.

We can only suggest you may wish to contact the Club for an update should you wish
."
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I think people are reading way too much into that EFL response.
That is true. But by a strange coincidence they still might be right. The ball may very much be in King’s and SISU’s hands. Personally I’ll believe it when it’s completed. If it never happens I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
That is true. But by a strange coincidence they still might be right. The ball may very much be in King’s and SISU’s hands. Personally I’ll believe it when it’s completed. If it never happens I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.

Well if its not King it will be MA, Storey or someone as yet unknown to us.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Fascinating suggestion. One which I've just pondered. However I'm still thinking counter-balance.

View attachment 27563

So Mr Red's legs are the pivot point. Mr Blue can move forward or back, enabling Mr Red to directly hit the water rather than soiling the historic brick work.
I can so see this being an A level mechanics question.

Though of course the correct answer the easiest way to shit directly into the canal is:

c) get on a barge and sit over the edge.

The One Where Estelle Dies Episode 15 GIF by Friends
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
I can so see this being an A level mechanics question.

Though of course the correct answer the easiest way to shit directly into the canal is:

c) get on a barge and sit over the edge.

The One Where Estelle Dies Episode 15 GIF by Friends
Was there a stipulation to shit directly in to the canal? If not, then it would be far easier to lay a log in the comfort of your own home (or someone else's, for a laugh), transport it incognito, and roll it in off the towpath.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
Agreed. Why would they go into detail to respond to a random fan request.

But that's the point. They did go into detail. Why mention that the club and purchaser are aware of the requirements at all?

It maybe nothing, but they could've just said. "Matters are on going. We can't discuss it any further"
 

SkyBlueSam01

Well-Known Member
Was there a stipulation to shit directly in to the canal? If not, then it would be far easier to lay a log in the comfort of your own home (or someone else's, for a laugh), transport it incognito, and roll it in off the towpath.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
Good acoustics are desired if not compulsory - v difficult to achieve the right tone and volume ('plop') if shit not produced in situ
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
I reckon the easiest way would be to hold on to a tree bankside and squat out... if you were still worried about splashback could use rope for extra distance...
Fraught with danger, I'm afraid. The chances of the branch breaking would lead to involuntary sphincter tightening and the bomb doors jammed shut.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top