Doug King Takeover (6 Viewers)

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Thanks. You'll have to wait and buy my book, which should be in all good bookshops for Christmas, at just £45.99. Makes "Papillon" look like a fortnight in CenterParcs.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

I've managed to get hold of a snippet of the first chapter.

'In 2021 I was jailed for shitting in the canal.
I receive a harsh sentence for refusing to name my accomplice.
Yes, I could have had my tariff reduced, but I wouldn't have been able to live with the thought of his owl been left alone to fend for itself'.
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
I've managed to get hold of a snippet of the first chapter.

'In 2021 I was jailed for shitting in the canal.
I receive a harsh sentence for refusing to name my accomplice.
Yes, I could have had my tariff reduced, but I wouldn't have been able to live with the thought of his owl been left alone to fend for itself'.
If there's one thing I've never needed an accomplice for, it's shitting.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
Thinking logically about it though, you would probably need an accomplice if you wanted to shit in a canal. Someone to hold your outstretched arms as you squat over the canal bank. Acting as a counter-balance.
I reckon you could perch at a lock without the need for assistance.
 

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
We just have to be patient and see what happens which is frustrating can’t see this Storey bloke being anything near the real deal and according to Doug King he is the real deal just waiting for the thumbs up from the EFL.
But nothing is ever simple at ccfc.
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
Thinking logically about it though, you would probably need an accomplice if you wanted to shit in a canal. Someone to hold your outstretched arms as you squat over the canal bank. Acting as a counter-balance.
Can't fault your logic.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

SkyBlueSam01

Well-Known Member
Thinking logically about it though, you would probably need an accomplice if you wanted to shit in a canal. Someone to hold your outstretched arms as you squat over the canal bank. Acting as a counter-balance.
Would the role not be more of a ballast than a counter-balance? The latter suggests the presence of a more dynamic central pivoting point between the accomplice and whoever is shitting over the edge
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
Thinking logically about it though, you would probably need an accomplice if you wanted to shit in a canal. Someone to hold your outstretched arms as you squat over the canal bank. Acting as a counter-balance.

That would require a high level of trust.
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
Would the role not be more of a ballast than a counter-balance? The latter suggests the presence of a more dynamic central pivoting point between the accomplice and whoever is shitting over the edge

Fascinating suggestion. One which I've just pondered. However I'm still thinking counter-balance.

1669901327755.png

So Mr Red's legs are the pivot point. Mr Blue can move forward or back, enabling Mr Red to directly hit the water rather than soiling the historic brick work.
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
I've managed to get hold of a snippet of the first chapter.

'In 2021 I was jailed for shitting in the canal.
I receive a harsh sentence for refusing to name my accomplice.
Yes, I could have had my tariff reduced, but I wouldn't have been able to live with the thought of his owl been left alone to fend for itself'.
I should have asked before, but what's the attraction of shitting in a canal?

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
I should have asked before, but what's the attraction of shitting in a canal?

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

Think Greggs might know.....PUSB
 

itsabuzzard

Well-Known Member
You tell us!
Despite what Clint van D says, that snippet certainly wasn't penned by me. Autobiographical perhaps?
As an aside, I'd guess there must have been aggravating circumstances to justify a custodial. Serial canal-shitter?

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
 

SkyBlueSam01

Well-Known Member
Fascinating suggestion. One which I've just pondered. However I'm still thinking counter-balance.

View attachment 27563

So Mr Red's legs are the pivot point. Mr Blue can move forward or back, enabling Mr Red to directly hit the water rather than soiling the historic brick work.
Really liking this model - thank you for the diagram which is very informative.

I hadn't previously considered the perched positioning of the feet (Mr Red), which would give excellent flexibility and control for the individual shitting into the canal.
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
The last snippet of info we've had was from the EFL basically saying the ball was in King and SISUs court. I suspect the ball is still there and long since stopped bouncing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top