If we still had Platt... (5 Viewers)

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Would he have had a place in starting line up?


Imo with the amount of long balls we were playing in the air he would have done a good job, possibly better than what ball can do (yet to be seen)

Am I mad!!?:facepalm:
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Yup, stark raving bonkers :)

Would Platt have buried that chance like Elliott? Would he have had the pace and energy to close down better than any City forward since Morrell? Sure we played too many high balls, but they were mostly by Murphy from goal-kicks and panicy clearances. Once the movement, fitness and composure gets better I think we'll keep the ball down a lot more. I think we were less direct today than the Yeovil game, and part of that is not having an "easy-ball" target-man option to aim for tonight.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Yup, stark raving bonkers :)

Would Platt have buried that chance like Elliott? Would he have had the pace and energy to close down better than any City forward since Morrell? Sure we played too many high balls, but they were mostly by Murphy from goal-kicks and panicy clearances. Once the movement, fitness and composure gets better I think we'll keep the ball down a lot more. I think we were less direct today than the Yeovil game, and part of that is not having an "easy-ball" target-man option to aim for tonight.

I agree with what you have said, but at times it seemed if big Clive was up there, he'd have brought it down and laid it off to Cody/Elliott. But that's all down to the players floating the ball up to 2 players bellow 5ft10!
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I agree with what you have said, but at times it seemed if big Clive was up there, he'd have brought it down and laid it off to Cody/Elliott. But that's all down to the players floating the ball up to 2 players bellow 5ft10!

One of the big positives for me was having two strikers capable of keeping up with each other-and after all, one striker assisted the other for the goal tonight. For all his efforts-and indeed impact as a gutsy sub-Platt set up precious few goals.


For me Platt was too much of a non-goalscoring forward. I now believe we have two strikers in the side capable of netting 15+ league goals for the first time in ages!
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
One of the big positives for me was having two strikers capable of keeping up with each other-and after all, one striker assisted the other for the goal tonight. For all his efforts-and indeed impact as a gutsy sub-Platt set up precious few goals.


For me Platt was too much of a non-goalscoring forward. I now believe we have two strikers in the side capable of netting 15+ league goals for the first time in ages!
And Ball as back up , i still think he has bags of potential .Also still linked with a PL striker on loan ,once we get "that player " then maybe send jeffers out on loan and listen to offers for RoD
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
One of the big positives for me was having two strikers capable of keeping up with each other-and after all, one striker assisted the other for the goal tonight. For all his efforts-and indeed impact as a gutsy sub-Platt set up precious few goals.


For me Platt was too much of a non-goalscoring forward. I now believe we have two strikers in the side capable of netting 15+ league goals for the first time in ages!

Again I agree, but how about playing Ball just behind the strikers to bring it down and then create chances?
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Not sure about Ball, I think he's a good sub option for when we need to chase it late on and go long, but his shocking shanked shot today didn't inspire confidence. I still think it's more of a negative in that pick a target man=defenders hoofing it all game, much as it was when Platt started (he was better as impact sub).

And I really don't think a target-man forward can play "in the hole", their skill-set is totally contrary to the job description, so to speak.
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
Not sure about Ball, I think he's a good sub option for when we need to chase it late on and go long, but his shocking shanked shot today didn't inspire confidence. I still think it's more of a negative in that pick a target man=defenders hoofing it all game, much as it was when Platt started (he was better as impact sub).

And I really don't think a target-man forward can play "in the hole", their skill-set is totally contrary to the job description, so to speak.
Fleck is the player we have bought to play "in the hole " .Baker will try and maybe Bell or Sheff can try it to but we need Fleck fully fit to play the diamond well
 

cyril

New Member
I think Elliot will have a big part in our success this season.

Let's not panic, there's glimpses of a decent backbone. Jennings and Barton aren't fit but look good, wood will be a beast in this league and will score goals and upfront Cody and Elliot can and will score goals

Thorn is probably as frustrated as us ATM but the players pivotal to his system aren't yet fit enough to really make it work. However we are unbeaten against two teams used to this league one of which will deffo be challenging

Bury will get buried
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I think Elliot will have a big part in our success this season.

Let's not panic, there's glimpses of a decent backbone. Jennings and Barton aren't fit but look good, wood will be a beast in this league and will score goals and upfront Cody and Elliot can and will score goals

Thorn is probably as frustrated as us ATM but the players pivotal to his system aren't yet fit enough to really make it work. However we are unbeaten against two teams used to this league one of which will deffo be challenging

Bury will get buried

Think your man was totally bang on about Elliott: I was doubtful about his qualities, but not any more. Cracking little player at this level, and I think he can get back to the good-Championship player he was before.
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
Like it has been said in other threads tonight , both Elliott and Jennings are Championship class .When both are fully fit and the rest of the squad are up and running we will be ok this year .I said top 8 start of the season , i still think that is where we are at but hope the feel good feeling returns this season and we can build on it for next season
PUSB
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Keep him out of rainbows and he'll be fine

I thought he said he liked a drink? Didn't know he was "outing" him too!
 

cyril

New Member
Hahaha no Ive not lived in the area for a while and it seems the only nightspot they talk about on gmk. Has about 5 kids actually
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
My local when I lived in Rugby used to be The Saracans Head, but they sold it and the new owners ruined it :mad:

Great beer garden and pool room back in the day. Then we moved onto the Dirty Duck, but they've ruined that too now by chaving it up.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Yeah, just a few! Saracens is The Courthouse now I think, bottom of North Street opposite where the Bingo used to be.

Duck is down the alleyway opposite WH Smiths and McDonalds. S'alright I guess.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Met my bird in the dirty duck. Well last but one

Last time I was there I spent most the night avoiding my ex. She was the finest woman I've ever met..at blanking someone she'd gone out with for two years. Guess my old dear had been onto something when she dubbed her The Ice Queen years before..
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Yeah the duck I the black swan?? Noel gardner used to do the door there?

Yeah, that's the one. Mostly happy memories there, aside from the above :)


Anyway, Clive Platt...:whistle:
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Top