W**ps confirm premiership final (2 Viewers)

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
Was really hoping they wouldn't go ahead. The had 4 more positive cases yesterday so I had hoped it would be the final nail but it appears not.
I suppose playing with a significantly weakened team and losing is better fpr them £££s wise than not playing at all. If they don't play the final i think it would be almost curtains for them.
1103d81de2278b4caebb9ce888822be4.jpg


Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
Nobody in the world actually cares about this final tbh

I care. I’d like to see them get absolutely hammered. I know, it’s petty, and spiteful, but there you are.

They shouldn’t have franchised themselves and in doing so stitched us up, I guess.

If or when they finally fold up or move on, the Rugby Premiership will be far less interesting for me. Who can I support when it isn’t ‘whoever is playing Wasps this week’. 😀
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
I care. I’d like to see them get absolutely hammered. I know, it’s petty, and spiteful, but there you are.

They shouldn’t have franchised themselves and in doing so stitched us up, I guess.

If or when they finally fold up or move on, the Rugby Premiership will be far less interesting for me. Who can I support when it isn’t ‘whoever is playing Wasps this week’. 😀
Cov, mate.
Just need to make that step up 😉
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I still don't get the top 4 thing. I am right in thinking you can be top all season and lose the play offs and not win the league?

More importantly, is that Wasps more humped financially?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It would have been better if they’d won as no one in Coventry would have cared and most not even known
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
It would have been better if they’d won as no one in Coventry would have cared and most not even known

Trying to find it on Twitter was embarrassing for such a "big event".

Search came up with Kansas City Chiefs and pest control...

Although you do get a fair amount of wankers from Warwickshire banging the Wasps drum on Twitter, sickening.
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
I still don't get the top 4 thing. I am right in thinking you can be top all season and lose the play offs and not win the league?

More importantly, is that Wasps more humped financially?
Yeah, thats why I said, theyll be better financially playing kids and losing rather than forfeiting and not playing at all. Lovely that they lost n all, but its also been a nice little pay day for the annoying tossers.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 

Nick

Administrator
It would have been better if they’d won as no one in Coventry would have cared and most not even known

Nobody cared anyway apart from the gravy train pricks at the Telegraph and CWR.

Bet they got a nice dinner out of it.
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
I still don't get the top 4 thing. I am right in thinking you can be top all season and lose the play offs and not win the league?

More importantly, is that Wasps more humped financially?

It’s wonderful to see them lose that. With regards to play offs it’s no different to using them to decide EFL promotion really. A team that finishes 3 places below you can take the prize.
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
I have no real knowledge on the subject, but I'd imagine the main benefit for Wasps is the fact they finished top 4, and I assume therefore gained qualification to the top European competition next season.

I'd expect this would be more significant than whether they won/lost today in the grand scheme of things money-wise.
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
Just in to say well played Exeter - best result for the country -Fuck wasps with a small W
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
It’s wonderful to see them lose that. With regards to play offs it’s no different to using them to decide EFL promotion really. A team that finishes 3 places below you can take the prize.

It's not really the same at all really though is it? You don't have 1st and 2nd places involved in the play offs.

So I'm correct in thinking you can be 4th all season and win the title? Surely that's a piss take if a team is 1st all season?

Weird format.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
It's not really the same at all really though is it? You don't have 1st and 2nd places involved in the play offs.

So I'm correct in thinking you can be 4th all season and win the title? Surely that's a piss take if a team is 1st all season?

Weird format.

All taken from the US because it's more £££. At least in the US the teams involved don't all play each other due to different leagues/divisions so it has some validity to find the best. When you;re picking them from the same league who've played the same teams you have over the season it kind of makes it hollow IMO and best treated like a separate small competition
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
All taken from the US because it's more £££. At least in the US the teams involved don't all play each other due to different leagues/divisions so it has some validity to find the best. When you;re picking them from the same league who've played the same teams you have over the season it kind of makes it hollow IMO and best treated like a separate small competition
Absolutely.
Ex have topped the league in each of the past four seasons, yet, ridiculously, haven't been crowned 'champions' each time. A travesty of money over integrity.
(The previous season they were equal top too, but officially second on a win-count, even though they had a better points-difference. Fucked up, is that).
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
It's not really the same at all really though is it? You don't have 1st and 2nd places involved in the play offs.

So I'm correct in thinking you can be 4th all season and win the title? Surely that's a piss take if a team is 1st all season?

Weird format.

My point is you could be a dozen points clear of the team that ends up going up. I don’t mind it at all. Adds something different at the end of the season. When it comes to top flight sport across the world we are in the minority in not having play offs. I know those elsewhere find it difficult to comprehend how we do it.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
My point is you could be a dozen points clear of the team that ends up going up. I don’t mind it at all. Adds something different at the end of the season. When it comes to top flight sport across the world we are in the minority in not having play offs. I know those elsewhere find it difficult to comprehend how we do it.

Yes it is difficult to comprehend the team finishing top after a full season being declared the winners.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
My point is you could be a dozen points clear of the team that ends up going up. I don’t mind it at all. Adds something different at the end of the season. When it comes to top flight sport across the world we are in the minority in not having play offs. I know those elsewhere find it difficult to comprehend how we do it.

What do you mean? All of the European football leagues declare the first placed team as the Champions, it's only dreadful American or otherwise displaying those symptoms i.e. designed for TV, use play offs as a way of increasing commercial exposure etc that do it differently.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
It's not really the same at all really though is it? You don't have 1st and 2nd places involved in the play offs.

So I'm correct in thinking you can be 4th all season and win the title? Surely that's a piss take if a team is 1st all season?

Weird format.

Not too different to how we have a 3rd promotion spot using the playoffs.

The fairest way to do it would be to have 3rd place, but also a pretty boring way to end it.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Not too different to how we have a 3rd promotion spot using the playoffs.

The fairest way to do it would be to have 3rd place, but also a pretty boring way to end it.

It's completely different though. You don't have 1st place losing out to 4th in football, just the teams in 3rd - 6th.

I'd understand the rugby play offs if it was to decide a 2nd place finish to play European rugby or something.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
It's completely different though. You don't have 1st place losing out to 4th in football, just the teams in 3rd - 6th.

I'd understand the rugby play offs if it was to decide a 2nd place finish to play European rugby or something.

As other people have mentioned, the playoff system is quite common for a number of sports. The context for rugby is very different too.

With Rugby Union, international players who are called up play for their country in the middle of the season, do not play for their clubs during their call up. For example, literally half the Saracens starting team were off playing for their various countries over the years. Therefore, there are teams disproportionately affected by the international breaks. You don't have this in football where there are regular breaks for the international fixtures.

Practical example, imagine the fuss if half the Man City or Liverpool teams were off on international duty and a team with few internationals were able to capitalise and finish 1st place.

A playoff system to determine the winner of the Premiership (football) wouldn't make sense. However, it makes perfect sense to have a playoff in Rugby Union.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
I have no real knowledge on the subject, but I'd imagine the main benefit for Wasps is the fact they finished top 4, and I assume therefore gained qualification to the top European competition next season.

I'd expect this would be more significant than whether they won/lost today in the grand scheme of things money-wise.
Cost them a bloody fortune travelling won't it? Plus loads of testing costs etc
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
As other people have mentioned, the playoff system is quite common for a number of sports. The context for rugby is very different too.

With Rugby Union, international players who are called up play for their country in the middle of the season, do not play for their clubs during their call up. For example, literally half the Saracens starting team were off playing for their various countries over the years. Therefore, there are teams disproportionately affected by the international breaks. You don't have this in football where there are regular breaks for the international fixtures.

Practical example, imagine the fuss if half the Man City or Liverpool teams were off on international duty and a team with few internationals were able to capitalise and finish 1st place.

A playoff system to determine the winner of the Premiership (football) wouldn't make sense. However, it makes perfect sense to have a playoff in Rugby Union.

Doesn’t apply in cricket which is similarly affected by international call ups
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
Cost them a bloody fortune travelling won't it? Plus loads of testing costs etc

I'd imagine the prize-money for getting there (a much smaller model than the Champions League for instance), and additional tv revenue would more than make up for it.

I'm not trying to back them here... just thinking realistically.

That said, i don't think European rugby will save them, nor did i think that missing out on the top 4 would ruin them... they are looking like a sinking ship but it will take time for them to go.
 

djbooth

Well-Known Member
I'd imagine the prize-money for getting there (a much smaller model than the Champions League for instance), and additional tv revenue would more than make up for it.

I'm not trying to back them here... just thinking realistically.

That said, i don't think European rugby will save them, nor did i think that missing out on the top 4 would ruin them... they are looking like a sinking ship but it will take time for them to go.

it’s not great I think it’s around 600,000 for the winners and 300,000. I heard that the premier final was 500,000 and runners up 250,000
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top