EFL Stadium Vote (1 Viewer)

matesx

Well-Known Member
IF it came to it (god forbid) i suppose MK Dons ground would be a decent ground share.
 

MatthewWallis

Well-Known Member
As everyone else has said, none are acceptable. We went to Northampton before with the assurance from the owners that we would be back in 3 years. We were and now look where we are again
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
50 miles they can go and fuck themselves!! they would need to lay on coaches to supporters, might be able to use the ones that WASPS stopped using to ferry their supporters from Wycombe who give up the Ghost on supporting them!
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Voted B - 3 years is plenty of time, not necesssery to complete building but at least start. Or have plans ready to go.

50 miles is a bit extreme though. Plenty’s of grounds in the midlands to attempt a ground share
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Voted B - 3 years is plenty of time, not necesssery to complete building but at least start. Or have plans ready to go.

50 miles is a bit extreme though. Plenty’s of grounds in the midlands to attempt a ground share

I think no one wants us. Walsall turned us down flat, the crook has left Northampton, the only person low enough to welcome us with open arms is Winkleman.
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
New ground isn’t even in their plans groundshare 3-5 years hoping wasps break in that time is my guess...

Could be a lot longer tho 10+ maybe,I’m almost certain we won’t be at the Ricoh next season sad times.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
I think no one wants us. Walsall turned us down flat, the crook has left Northampton, the only person low enough to welcome us with open arms is Winkleman.
I think this time is a little different, Walsall turned us down as it caused uproar. I’d imagine this is the reason behind the survey.

Teams would be more accommodating if it was received well enough.

I’d like the praise the trust at the moment, this is what we need, straight to the point no bias. Straight question to Coventry fans - What is acceptable in our situation?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I voted A, on the basis that SISU won't be here forever but I want my club to be. Voting B just feels to me like a temporary stay of execution - time passes quickly, and it could be used to kill the club in 3 years time with an argument that the fans wanted it that way. C is just a waste of an option.

Edit: as someone else said, none of the options are really acceptable.
This
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Absolutely barmy. Can't see how anyone can vote for any option at all.

50 miles is nonsensical. Has to be within 20 at the very maximum.

I can see why fans would vote for C, because A and B are like not having a club anyway.

Ridiculous poll, that.
Having a club 50 miles away for 3 years is like it going bust. Alright mate.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Having a club 50 miles away for 3 years is like it going bust. Alright mate.
Didn't say that, so stop twisting my words.

When we went to Northampton it felt like not having a club at all. This would feel the same and know loads and loads of people who felt the exact same way.

It will feel like not having a club at all and when we were in Northampton I didn't even know when we were playing. :(
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
not a skewed survey with an expected answer at all .............. not :banghead: Just the EFL covering themselves with a ready made excuse for when it happens. Allows them to say we consulted the fans, when they rubber stamp the decision rather than helping to sort the mess out

Option A is bad enough, and is the very last resort in that the club survives (at least for a time)

But how any CCFC fan could even consider a vote for C is beyond me
 

JulianDarbyFTW

Well-Known Member
Absolutely barmy. Can't see how anyone can vote for any option at all.

50 miles is nonsensical. Has to be within 20 at the very maximum.

I can see why fans would vote for C, because A and B are like not having a club anyway.

Ridiculous poll, that.

The fifty miles gives us options. If you limit it to twenty there are probably a handful of options, most at grounds not fit for L1 football, and most of which we've probably already looked at. Putting such a low limit on is akin to voting option C anyway.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
not a skewed survey with an expected answer at all .............. not :banghead: Just the EFL covering themselves with a ready made excuse for when it happens

Option A is bad enough, and is the very last resort in that the club survives

But how any CCFC fan could even consider a vote for C is beyond me
People will vote for it though. Survey seems rigged.

Moving 50 miles away could all but kill the club anyway. Next generation of fans lost. Diehards lost to never return, dwindling crowds, a loss of identity and a fraction of supporters behind the club.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
The fifty miles gives us options. If you limit it to twenty there are probably a handful of options, most at grounds not fit for L1 football, and most of which we've probably already looked at. Putting such a low limit on is akin to voting option C anyway.
But I see 50 as potentially being like C anyway.

Everyone I have spoken to so far have said they wouldn't go any further than Nuneaton.

50 miles will feel like a slow death of the club.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
People will vote for it though. Survey seems rigged.

Moving 50 miles away could all but kill the club anyway. Next generation of fans lost. Diehards lost to never return, dwindling crowds, a loss of identity and a fraction of supporters behind the club.

Agree much of that but there is a chance the club could survive which is surely better than no club at all
 
  • Like
Reactions: vow

Users who are viewing this thread

Top