FA charge Davies over stamping claim (1 Viewer)

Mcbean · May 14, 2018

Seems he has tomorrow to appeal and if banned will miss three games - i havent see the video yet so cant comment - missed it during the match

Mcbean · May 14, 2018

Missed also the other thread - Nick delete as i cant seem to ! - need a red bull

Sky Blue Pete · May 14, 2018

Absolute joke!!!

Mr Panda · May 14, 2018

Will miss his aerial presence against their long ball tactics but we have adequate replacements. In truth his judgement for their goal was ridiculous, stand still and the cross doesn't get to Forte so it'll be good to get Willis' pace back in the side, particularly when Grimmer is exposed on that right side.

pastythegreat · May 14, 2018

So does this mean that Ameobi won't be available for 3 matches too? After all his elbow to McDonald's bollocks was as bad if not worse that Davies' "stamp" on Saturday! 6 of one half a dozen of the other!

ajsccfc · May 14, 2018

I'd like to also see a ban placed on whoever assaulted Bayliss in the 87th minute to concede the penalty. Fair's fair.

oucho · May 14, 2018

FFS - make sure he appeals, but even then the effect of the appeal may be a reduced ban (one game, down from three) which wouldn't help us for Friday. Hhhmmmm.

Grendel · May 14, 2018

pastythegreat said:
So does this mean that Ameobi won't be available for 3 matches too? After all his elbow to McDonald's bollocks was as bad if not worse that Davies' "stamp" on Saturday! 6 of one half a dozen of the other!

No as that wasn’t on live TV and it’s vurtually impossible to have a ban in those circumstances - it was idiotic and Davies hopefully will be fined

Greggs · May 14, 2018

fuck sake

stupot07 · May 14, 2018

Is rhead facing an fa charge for assaultinf the Exeter keeper?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Grendel · May 14, 2018

stupot07 said:
Is rhead facing an fa charge for assaultinf the Exeter keeper?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I believe he was cautioned at the time

stupot07 · May 14, 2018

Well done BBC...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Otis · May 14, 2018

oucho said:
FFS - make sure he appeals, but even then the effect of the appeal may be a reduced ban (one game, down from three) which wouldn't help us for Friday. Hhhmmmm.

He appeals and loses and he will miss Wembley.

Thing in his favour is that he said it was an accident and Duffy accepted that.

Definitely should form his defence.

It does look to me as if he maybe meant it, but I don't think it is clear cut.

Got a fair chance of winning an appeal.

stupot07 · May 14, 2018

Grendel said:
I believe he was cautioned at the time

Ffs that was nearly as bad as Ben thatchers.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Otis · May 14, 2018

stupot07 said:
Well done BBC...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

That's perfect. We have a defence of mistaken identity.

That's the wrong Tom.

pastythegreat · May 14, 2018

Grendel said:
No as that wasn’t on live TV and it’s vurtually impossible to have a ban in those circumstances - it was idiotic and Davies hopefully will be fined

He can't be punished because it wasn't on live TV?
More like the FA couldn't give a fuck about anything outside of their precious premier league as long as it doesn't affect them, this was bought to national attention so they HAVE to show face! The Ameobi ASSULT hasn't even hit their radar and never will because were just league 2 and of no priority. Even the toilet cleaner at FA HQ is above giving a shit about anything that happens in L2

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Grendel · May 14, 2018

Otis said:
He appeals and loses and he will miss Wembley.

Thing in his favour is that he said it was an accident and Duffy accepted that.

Definitely should form his defence.

It does look to me as if he maybe meant it, but I don't think it is clear cut.

Got a fair chance of winning an appeal.

It’s a three game ban what’s Wembley got to do with it?

wingy · May 14, 2018

Otis said:
He appeals and loses and he will miss Wembley.

Thing in his favour is that he said it was an accident and Duffy accepted that.

Definitely should form his defence.

It does look to me as if he maybe meant it, but I don't think it is clear cut.

Got a fair chance of winning an appeal.

Misses Wembley anyway doesn't he, Violent Conduct three games?

Londonccfcfan · May 14, 2018

stupot07 said:
Ffs that was nearly as bad as Ben thatchers.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I wasn't aware of that incident. that's a disgrace!

mark82 · May 14, 2018

I watched it and it seemed to be in his stride. I'm not sure there was any real intent.

pastythegreat · May 14, 2018

mark82 said:
I watched it and it seemed to be in his stride. I'm not sure there was any real intent.

Eyeing up the keeper and jumping (shoulder first) into his head is "Just in his stride"? You're having a laugh mate!

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Otis · May 14, 2018

wingy said:
Misses Wembley anyway doesn't he, Violent Conduct three games?

Okay. Didn't know that.

Thought it was what was deemed by the panel. Is it set at 3 games then?

mark82 · May 14, 2018

pastythegreat said:
Eyeing up the keeper and jumping (shoulder first) into his head is "Just in his stride"? You're having a laugh mate!

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

I mean Davies. These was an assault.

smileycov · May 14, 2018

Londonccfcfan said:
I wasn't aware of that incident. that's a disgrace!

That was v Shrewsbury in the checkatrade final

Otis · May 14, 2018

pastythegreat said:
Eyeing up the keeper and jumping (shoulder first) into his head is "Just in his stride"? You're having a laugh mate!

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Think he means the Davies incident.

steve82 · May 14, 2018

Poor from the FA this, half of the Notts County side as well as Lincoln and Wycombe would be banned if they cared to look outside the premier league.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Grendel · May 14, 2018

steve82 said:
Poor from the FA this, half of the Notts County side as well as Lincoln and Wycombe would be banned if they cared to look outside the premier league.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well they would be if they did that in a live TV game

wingy · May 14, 2018

You take that still image and its his heel, for me a stamp would have been the other end and arch of the foot, but that is subjective and I may be biased.

no_loyalty · May 14, 2018

Otis said:
Got a fair chance of winning an appeal.

We are Coventry City we never win appeals

Covstu · May 14, 2018

It doesn’t look great even though it was genuinely a mistake.

Warwickhunt · May 14, 2018

stupot07 said:
Well done BBC...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I think the FA have got mistaken identity cos that's Bayliss.

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · May 14, 2018

Ffs massive blow
Him Doyle and McNulty are the real spine of our team!

higgs · May 14, 2018

Bayliss could be banned aswell for diving he's got an fa charge aswell tomorrow

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · May 14, 2018

All 3 refs on the panel have to agree, there is hope then with how bad the standard of reffing is!

(3 match ban coming up!)

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · May 14, 2018

higgs said:
Bayliss could be banned aswell for diving he's got an fa charge aswell tomorrow

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Where have you seen that reported?

FA charge Davies over stamping claim (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Moderator

Facebook User

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread