Tim Fisher (1 Viewer)

[Sky Blue Kid]

1. Could Mr. Fisher confirm he receives no director’s salary?

Correct, Mr Fisher has not received a director’s salary since May 2015.

2. Does Mr. Fisher receive expenses payments from CCFC?

Mr Fisher has received no payments, whether salary, expenses or otherwise, since May 2015. The club is totally committed to using every spare penny, where available, for the improvement of the football team.

3. Has Mr. Fisher got any money invested in CCFC? If yes, can he confirm the source of this investment?

Mr Fisher has no investment in CCFC.



Didn't anybody have the presence of mind to ask if SISU, Otium, or any other party were paying him a salary/wage? Simple to "Fend off" if asked if only CCFC were paying him anything.

 

[Nick]

Get him at a fans forum, can try and catch him out on that then

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Get him at a fans forum, can try and catch him out on that then

A long way to travel to ask a question inside what will probably be a one hour meeting. I don't mind if someone else asks the question though... be my guest

 

[Skybluefaz]

Aren't they the ccfc approved minutes though? Even if someone had asked, it sounds as if it would have been omitted based on Ray Large's post match call to BBC CW. SCG is a farce.

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Aren't they the ccfc approved minutes though? Even if someone had asked, it sounds as if it would have been omitted based on Ray Large's post match call to BBC CW. SCG is a farce.

Doesn't stop a clever bugger recording his answer though does it? After all Private notes (Ann Lucas) "Hell will freeze over" were used against the CCC. were they not?

 

[Skyblueweeman]

Didn't anybody have the presence of mind to ask if SISU, Otium, or any other party were paying him a salary/wage? Simple to "Fend off" if asked if only CCFC were paying him anything.

Who cares? So long as it isn't us (ie. out of any CCFC coffers) then I'm not bothered who pays the twonk.

 

[Grendel]

Who cares? So long as it isn't us (ie. out of any CCFC coffers) then I'm not bothered who pays the twonk.

Spot on

 

[The Prefect]

Who cares? So long as it isn't us (ie. out of any CCFC coffers) then I'm not bothered who pays the twonk.

I can't imagine that he isn't being paid from CCFC coffers - either via SISU or a third party service company which is then charged into the club.

Failing that the work he is doing on the stadium etc. is for third parties (investors?) into the stadium and we'll be tenants. Same as Ricoh.

 

[skybluetony176]

We'll always be paying for TF's involvement in the club in one sense or another. We're still paying the price for the Northampton debacle now.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

We'll always be paying for TF's involvement in the club in one sense or another. We're still paying the price for the Northampton debacle now.

That wasn't the question though Big Tone...

 

[skybluetony176]

That wasn't the question though Big Tone...

No.but it is a valid point Wee Man. Just because he no longer takes a wage, apparently. Doesn't mean he's not costing the club financially. Which after all is probably the real reason they've made a point of telling us. Well that and they needed a distraction ahead of the JR news. Maybe his pay is now performance related. That would certainly explain a lot

 

[Suffolk sky blues]

It's not a very attractive job representing sisu.who is left that we know of tim Mark & joy. Oh dear the future?

 

[wingy]

Just read through the Q&A again and it confirms a couple of points, that The Sale of Ryton will fund New facilities.
Secondly he states that, "No other party is Involved in Securing the Cat2 Academy facilities apart from CSF.
Not Even Warwick University??

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Who cares? So long as it isn't us (ie. out of any CCFC coffers) then I'm not bothered who pays the twonk.

OSB58 has already said on another thread that Otium ARE CCFC. So if they or SISU are paying him, it ultimately comes down to the fans that are paying. See what I mean?

 

[italiahorse]

Just read through the Q&A again and it confirms a couple of points, that The Sale of Ryton will fund New facilities.
Secondly he states that, "No other party is Involved in Securing the Cat2 Academy facilities apart from CSF.
Not Even Warwick University??

The recent audit was carried out as if nothing is changing.
As the CCFC academy guy said when I spoke to him as they cleared us off the pitch ready for the audit. "We can't plan for things that might happen in 3 years time"

 

[Skyblueweeman]

OSB58 has already said on another thread that Otium ARE CCFC. So if they or SISU are paying him, it ultimately comes down to the fans that are paying. See what I mean?

I get you, but if they've said he's not receiving a wage, that means he's not receiving a wage. Surely? I know it then boils down to whether they're telling the truth or not.

Regardless, if he does receive any money, so long as this doesn't come out of the CCFC purse, or Otium if that's then the same thing, I don't really care where it comes from.

 

[fernandopartridge]

Just read through the Q&A again and it confirms a couple of points, that The Sale of Ryton will fund New facilities.
Secondly he states that, "No other party is Involved in Securing the Cat2 Academy facilities apart from CSF.
Not Even Warwick University??

You do wonder, CSF also in charge of the AT7 aren't they and the big place at Canley?

 

[wingy]

You do wonder, CSF also in charge of the AT7 aren't they and the big place at Canley?

There's a great Campus over on Broad Lane (the old school, shit my memory is getting bad, Woodlands??)
Seems allocated for housing, laudable and Important.
Let us have that, plenty of Infrastructure in place and bin Amazon off from the wedge, stick the Real Estate there, job done.! B-)

 

[The Gentleman]

1. Could Mr. Fisher confirm he receives no director’s salary?

Correct, Mr Fisher has not received a director’s salary since May 2015.

2. Does Mr. Fisher receive expenses payments from CCFC?

Mr Fisher has received no payments, whether salary, expenses or otherwise, since May 2015. The club is totally committed to using every spare penny, where available, for the improvement of the football team.

3. Has Mr. Fisher got any money invested in CCFC? If yes, can he confirm the source of this investment?

Mr Fisher has no investment in CCFC.



Didn't anybody have the presence of mind to ask if SISU, Otium, or any other party were paying him a salary/wage? Simple to "Fend off" if asked if only CCFC were paying him anything.

Or you could've called the title of this thread 'Oldfiver'

 

[Grendel]

Or you could've called the title of this thread 'Oldfiver'

Taking the bet Big Man?

 

[Ashdown]

1. Could Mr. Fisher confirm he receives no director’s salary?

Correct, Mr Fisher has not received a director’s salary since May 2015.

2. Does Mr. Fisher receive expenses payments from CCFC?

Mr Fisher has received no payments, whether salary, expenses or otherwise, since May 2015. The club is totally committed to using every spare penny, where available, for the improvement of the football team.

3. Has Mr. Fisher got any money invested in CCFC? If yes, can he confirm the source of this investment?

Mr Fisher has no investment in CCFC.



Didn't anybody have the presence of mind to ask if SISU, Otium, or any other party were paying him a salary/wage? Simple to "Fend off" if asked if only CCFC were paying him anything.

He's not working for nothing is he ?!

 

[Tonylinc]

You bet he's not. He is being paid through Avro, Sisu or some related company but not by CCFC as such but you can bet that the club are picking up the tab because they are self sufficient are they not?

 

[clint van damme]

The recent audit was carried out as if nothing is changing.
As the CCFC academy guy said when I spoke to him as they cleared us off the pitch ready for the audit. "We can't plan for things that might happen in 3 years time"

Any idea if the audits are yearly or every two years?

 

[ccfc92]

I get you, but if they've said he's not receiving a wage, that means he's not receiving a wage. Surely? I know it then boils down to whether they're telling the truth or not.

Regardless, if he does receive any money, so long as this doesn't come out of the CCFC purse, or Otium if that's then the same thing, I don't really care where it comes from.

And if it does?

 

[shmmeee]

There's a great Campus over on Broad Lane (the old school, shit my memory is getting bad, Woodlands??)
Seems allocated for housing, laudable and Important.
Let us have that, plenty of Infrastructure in place and bin Amazon off from the wedge, stick the Real Estate there, job done.! B-)

Anyone planning on stopping me getting One Hour Amazon Delivery and Amazon Fresh will have to get through me first.

Could they build the stadium on top of the Amazon warehouse? Would be the modern equivalent of the Ricoh deal.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

And if it does?

Well, legally, every employee is entitled to a wage from their employer.

Whether he deserves it or not is another question...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[georgehudson]

Well TF, your SCG statement that you have received nothing, we thus take as true,
it's just that I feel, 'wooh wooh here come the BB train again',
I'd hope Damien Collins has the ability to discern what is the truth.

 

[Captain Dart]

Well, legally, every employee is entitled to a wage from their employer.

Whether he deserves it or not is another question...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He is a Director, not an employee as such.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

He is a Director, not an employee as such.

A director is still an employee. Regardless, he's still entitled to a salary.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Captain Dart]

A director is still an employee. Regardless, he's still entitled to a salary.

Not unless he has a contract that makes him one.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

Not unless he has a contract that makes him one.
View attachment 6028

But the majority are, right?

Anyway, in my opinion, Directors and entitled to a wage and all directors I work with, take a wage from their organisation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk